Preview

ASSES THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF AUSTRIAPRUSSIA

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
765 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ASSES THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF AUSTRIAPRUSSIA
ASSES THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF AUSTRIA,PRUSSIA AND RUSSIA IN THE DEFEAT OF NAPOLEON
BONAPARTE.
Austria ,Prussia and Russia played a significant role in the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte due to policies that they adopted in their respective nations.The following essay shall look on their relative importance made by these countries in the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte who had dominated Europe for some time. In Prussia, patriotism and nationalism can be considered as an important factor.There was also uncertainty among the Prussians about their future in Europe.This resulted in Prussia' s massive resentment of the French domination ,and resultantly a rebellion against Napoleon began to grow.Prussia appointed French -like reformers ,in order to strengthen their state in the event of an attack. Furthermore, key military reforms were introduced in order to strengthen Prussia and defend her from threats of external aggression.There was massive recruitment and professional training of personel.This enabled Prussia to have a strong standing army.Prussia also opened the second front to Europe.This had the effect of stretching Napoleon.The net effect of the reforms that by Prussia was to make her a useful ally in the fight and defeat of Napoleon.
More so, Russia had relative importance in the defeat of Napoleon.The The enmity between Russia and
Napoleon was occasioned by the Continental System that had been implemented by Napoleon.Ther was disagreements on territories that had been conquerd.There was no consensus as regards the future of
Turkey, Poland and Sweden and consequently the Tsar decided to pull out of the Continental
System.This prompted the launch of massive expedition against Russia in 1822.
Furthermore, Russia was important to the defeat of Napoleon in that Napoleon miscalculated his yet soldiers on his party yet Russia was a big nation.Russia used time and space to defeat Napoleon.
In addition ,Austria had relevant importance to the defeat of Napoleon.The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Western Civ Ii Notes

    • 3811 Words
    • 16 Pages

    * During the 18th century the capital of Prussia was Berlin, it was becoming a military power and was becoming very powerful…

    • 3811 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander realised that even though Russia was very large in size and was considered as a great power it lacked in finances. Its main…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Russia began to contribute more and more to the culture of Europe. For example, Pushkin…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They made other changes in the boundaries of Europe, establishing Prussia as a "sentinel" against France, and created a new kingdom out of Belgium and Holland.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismark Attack Paper

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the King of Prussia asked Bismark to be his Prime Minister, he wanted Bismark to unite all Germans under one power, and one crown. He had a parliament that wouldn’t pay their military and needed a way to get all Germans from the Saxons, Bavarians and Hessians to unite and become a stronger country.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To most of Europe, Napoleon was just another conqueror trying to expand his territories, but to the people of France, he was a great leader; he “restored peace and order at home” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586). Restoring order to France was one of his greatest domestic achievements; the people loved him for his support in helping them win their fight for equal rights “to achieve wealth, status, and security for their property” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586).…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia’s poor performance in the war was an extremely important factor because it led to the Tsar becoming more unpopular. At the beginning of the war, there was a strong sense of patriotisms in Russia due to the excellent war performance. The decline in Russia’s war performance caused morale in the army and country to decrease. The situation of the war was made worse by the fact that in September 1915 after the Russians lost battles to the Germans (Tannenburg and Masurian Lakes); the Tsar took personal control of the army and dismissed his uncle, the Grand Duke Nikolai. As a result the performance of the army could be blamed directly on the Tsar himself.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prussia was once a massive empire, it had a strong military, many different ethnic groups, and a bunch of different leaders, that made the empire better. I will talk about some of the different leaders of Prussia. I will also talk about some of the things that made the military so strong and feared. I will also talk about what happened when Germany and Prussia finally became one. Next I will talk about all of the problems that this new empire had because of religious, and cultural tensions.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before World War 1, the Russian political state was extremely corrupt and fragile. Nicholas II held absolute power and his dynasty had ruled Russia for 500 years and was increasingly unpopular. Nicholas II traditional ruled Russia without a parliament. The Noble class of Russia owned most of the countries wealth and land. Nicholas II assigned family members to important political roles; this caused him to have absolute power over Russia without any threats of being over powered. Not only was Nicholas II corrupt with assigning important roles, but also he had insufficiency of the training and experience needed for the Russian Tsar, his failure to make decisions and his organization was extremely poor, “Unfit to run a village post office” This underlines the point that Nicholas II was extremely poor at making decisions and his lack organization was so poor that he would be unable to run a small village post office, that is normally very quiet, let alone Russia, one of the worlds biggest countries, this is backed up by “His ancestors did not pass on to him one quality which would have made him capable of governing an empire”. Therefore this shows that his leadership of the country…

    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Campaign of 1812 should have been a another crusade for Napoleon, but he now faced 2 new policies that he had never faced before, the severe Russian winter and the notorious scorched-earth policy. On June 23, 1812 Napoleon's Grande Armee, over 500,000 men strong, poured over the Russian border. An equal amount of Russian forces awaited them. The result of the campaign was a surprise. Two authors, General carl von Clausewitz and Brett James, show similarities in reasons why Napoleon had lost this campaign to Russia.<br><br>Napoleon believed that after a few quick victorious battles, he could convince Alexander to return to the Continental System. He also decided that if he occupied Moscow, the Russian government would crumple and ask for…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning there were imperial electors that ran the estates of East Germany and Prussia. When Frederick William came into power as the “Great Elector”, he was able to heavily tax the germanic lands without the consent from the nobles. Taxation allowed for strong dominance over land-owning classes and more importantly, the peasantry. This brought together the Prussian cities and eliminated noble power, thus making Frederick William the absolute ruler. As soon as his son, Frederick William I, came into power, he made sure that all taxation funds were funneled into military power. He transformed Prussia into a disciplined, skilled, military state that would answer to him only through noble commanders. He forced the peasants to fight in the army, and when retired, to provide for the Prussian army and state the agricultural necessities to keep the country going. John McKay exclaims that “with all mean harnessed to the war machine, Prussian civil society became rigid and highly disciplined,” (482). Ultimately, Frederick William and his son were able to ensure a highly absolutist rule through the use of taxes and military motivation. Compared to the Austrian power, the Prussian Empire had a strong foundation of military skill and poise, and continued to push their peasants to the brinking point of…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To a large extent, Napoleon Bonaparte’s failed invasion of Russia was the cause of his eventual downfall. In 1812 Napoleon marched with his Grand Army into Russia in an attempt to seize the country. The crushing defeat which followed devastated the army, leaving it incapacitated and vulnerable. This venture into Russia crippled Napoleon’s quest for European domination, and destroyed his fiercely defended reputation as an indestructible leader. While Napoleon was at war various coup d’état (overthrow) attempts were made back in France, showing that he had chosen an inopportune time to leave the centre of his power. Furthermore, he was fighting simultaneous wars on two fronts; Russia and Spain. Napoleon also made the mistake of believing in the loyalty of the countries which he had previously conquered. While he was on his campaign in Russia, the powers of Europe conspired against him and awaited a moment of opportunity to mutiny against him. Other factors such as the detested Continental System and rising nationalist movements played a part in the downfall of Napoleon but it is clear that the failed Russian invasion was a turning point in his reign. It destroyed his main fighting force and exposed a moment of weakness which his enemies were quick to exploit. Napoleon was abdicated and exiled in 1815, the result of this crushing defeat in his otherwise successful rule.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June of 1812, Napoleon began his deadly Russian campaign, a landmark in the history of the caustic potential of warfare. All mainland Europe was under his control, and the invasion of Russia was an effort to force Tsar Alexander planned once again to the terms of a treaty that Napoleon had enforced upon him four years earlier. Having collected nearly half a million soldiers, from France as well as all of the states of Europe, Napoleon entered Russia at the lead of the largest army ever seen. The Russians, under the power of Marshal Kutuzov, could not hope to defeat him in a direct conflict.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why do you think that the French people and the Pope supported Napoleon’s decision to make himself an emperor?…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays