Assignment 2.3 Ethics Exercise
2.3 Ethics Exercise
Study 4 In a simulation training study, undergraduate participants will be asked to help another participant learn a list of words. In reality, though, the participant learning the words will be an experimenter confederate who purposely gets some of the words wrong. The actual participants will be told that they have to scold the learner whenever the learner makes a mistake. Anytime the participants hesitate in scolding the learner for mistakes, the experimenter will tell them that they must scold the learner or they will not receive credit for the experiment. The number of times the participants scold the learners will be recorded. Each participant will sign a consent form before the experiment begins.
Does the study have scientific merit? How ill society or the subjects of the study benefit? …show more content…
It was not a sound design. The benefit would be an appropriate way of using criticizing learning how to deal with patience properly following direction. The study can provide new knowledge and the participant can gain more insight.
Does the study place subjects at risk for either physical or psychological harm? If it does, what aspects of the study cause this risk? Can you suggest less risky procedures that would still provide the researcher with the same information?
Answer: Yes, Aspects that causes the study at risk is because minimum or psychologist harm leading to little stress and emotion distress along with put the participate in a bad mood. Some suggest is it should have been two types of stimulation instead of one, such as a positive and negative factors.
Will subjects read and sign a consent form? If not, is there enough information given to the subjects to provide informed
Study 4 In a simulation training study, undergraduate participants will be asked to help another participant learn a list of words. In reality, though, the participant learning the words will be an experimenter confederate who purposely gets some of the words wrong. The actual participants will be told that they have to scold the learner whenever the learner makes a mistake. Anytime the participants hesitate in scolding the learner for mistakes, the experimenter will tell them that they must scold the learner or they will not receive credit for the experiment. The number of times the participants scold the learners will be recorded. Each participant will sign a consent form before the experiment begins.
Does the study have scientific merit? How ill society or the subjects of the study benefit? …show more content…
It was not a sound design. The benefit would be an appropriate way of using criticizing learning how to deal with patience properly following direction. The study can provide new knowledge and the participant can gain more insight.
Does the study place subjects at risk for either physical or psychological harm? If it does, what aspects of the study cause this risk? Can you suggest less risky procedures that would still provide the researcher with the same information?
Answer: Yes, Aspects that causes the study at risk is because minimum or psychologist harm leading to little stress and emotion distress along with put the participate in a bad mood. Some suggest is it should have been two types of stimulation instead of one, such as a positive and negative factors.
Will subjects read and sign a consent form? If not, is there enough information given to the subjects to provide informed