Isabelle
Han China and Ancient Athens were both very successful cities. The Chinese empire was much larger and was a more unified nation than Greece. Greece was made of many city-states that fought between themselves more often than they fought together. But despite their disputes, Greece had managed to produce many talented philosophers and historians, such as Pericles, Sophocles, Socrates, and Plato. Many historians think it was because of the Greek political system. The following document will compare and contrast Ancient Athens and Han China and show how different the two nations really are using facts about the cities’ physical nature, their governments, and their citizenship:
Physical
In this time period, China was much larger than Greece. China is larger than Greece even today. Ancient Greece was a series of mountainous islands, whereas China was one large landmass. Both of them were next to …show more content…
Han China had more slaves and unskilled workers than Athens, but they only made up about 7% of the population, whereas slaves in Athens made up more than one-third of the population. Athens and Han China had similar opinions when it came to the distinction between master and slave. Their empires both accepted and lived by the law that those who rule are supported by those who are ruled. Most of the men that worked in Athens were farmers. Most of the men that worked in Han China were peasant farmers or urban skilled workers. They had distinctive classes, the lower class, the middle class, and the high class. The ruler (or rulers if there are more than one) and the religious leaders, aristocrats, and major government officials made up the high class, the citizens (urban skilled workers such as farmers, merchants, etc.) made up the middle class , and the slaves or unskilled workers made up lower