Attitudes of Christianity and Islam Toward Merchants and Trade.
Attitudes of Christianity and Islam Toward Merchants and Trade.
|
Attitudes of Christianity and Islam Toward Merchants and Trade.
By vishs95, april. 2011 | 6 Pages (1413 Words) | 4 Views
|
Should law makers impose restraints on the amount of sugar each person ingests? Lawmakers should impose restraints on the amount of sugar each person ingests. In the text Sugar Lobby to Aggressively Oppose World Health Organization's Diet Report the author states “Most people don't calculate numbers when drinking soft drinks or eating baked foods, such as cookies and cakes, which are laden with added sugars. She also warns that many low-fat foods are also high in sugar.” This can show us that if we do not have restraints on sugar know one will pay attention to how much they consume. An average person doesn’t know how much sugar is in each food or drink they have, which makes it hard for us to cut back on are own. In the article it says “Eating too much of these foods is storing up health problems for their future.” This shows that lawmakers should put a restraint on sugar because kids are a part of the problem and it is progressively affecting people who eat foods that contain a lot of sugar. Sugar can affect you when you are older or right away. This makes it hard for people to know if they are injected with too much sugar. If lawmakers make restraints then it is harder for people to get more then there body should get. Sugars can lead to 7 different concerning areas; cancer, cholesterol, diabetes, diet, hyper activity, obesity, and tooth decay. Therefore, since there is not one outcome to the effects of sugar it is harder to stop it without restraints. For example, if your hose has a leak you put a piece of duck tape on it and then it’s ok because it has no other things wrong with it. What if you had the same hose but with 5 holes instead of one? what if you only had that one
|
Attitudes of Christianity and Islam Toward Merchants and Trade.
By vishs95, april. 2011 | 6 Pages (1413 Words) | 4 Views
|
Should law makers impose restraints on the amount of sugar each person ingests? Lawmakers should impose restraints on the amount of sugar each person ingests. In the text Sugar Lobby to Aggressively Oppose World Health Organization's Diet Report the author states “Most people don't calculate numbers when drinking soft drinks or eating baked foods, such as cookies and cakes, which are laden with added sugars. She also warns that many low-fat foods are also high in sugar.” This can show us that if we do not have restraints on sugar know one will pay attention to how much they consume. An average person doesn’t know how much sugar is in each food or drink they have, which makes it hard for us to cut back on are own. In the article it says “Eating too much of these foods is storing up health problems for their future.” This shows that lawmakers should put a restraint on sugar because kids are a part of the problem and it is progressively affecting people who eat foods that contain a lot of sugar. Sugar can affect you when you are older or right away. This makes it hard for people to know if they are injected with too much sugar. If lawmakers make restraints then it is harder for people to get more then there body should get. Sugars can lead to 7 different concerning areas; cancer, cholesterol, diabetes, diet, hyper activity, obesity, and tooth decay. Therefore, since there is not one outcome to the effects of sugar it is harder to stop it without restraints. For example, if your hose has a leak you put a piece of duck tape on it and then it’s ok because it has no other things wrong with it. What if you had the same hose but with 5 holes instead of one? what if you only had that one