Both scenarios vehemently loathe capitalism; the idea of one profiting independently with very limited interference from the government. Venezuela, a de facto Socialist nation, plainly supports the idea of the government providing numerous necessities to its citizens. Therefore, little government action in businesses is a hinderance. In Anthem, it is a similar situation; based on collectivism, society determined the occupation of citizens. These jobs consisted of products beneficial to everyone in the society, and any object not accepted by all is blasphemy. Also, both governments are in denial that their policies will bring them forward, and those who think discretely are vacuous. When in fact, these administrations’ laws are stagnating society and the citizens themselves. These leaders are essentially assuming their roles as dictators; as a result, they have the authority to enact any laws, whether they are progressive or stagnant. With this greater influence, they perceive themselves as intelligent and the right leader for the civilization; as opposed to the people themselves. It is quite evident that Venezuela and Anthem possess leaders meeting these criterias. In Venezuela, President Maduro used his power to obstruct opposition claiming his laws are ineffective and actually destructive. Also, when criticized, President Maduro made numerous excuses, stating that the administration is not the source of the issue. One country being the main target of threats: the United States of coup attempts and oil conflicts. As for Anthem, the citizens basically are unintelligent from birth. With the society brainwashing generations of their people, it resulted in people stalling in development and knowledge. Only those who “shine” in the eyes of the council will flourish in their collective civilization. Also, when Equality presented the council with electricity, they referred to the
Both scenarios vehemently loathe capitalism; the idea of one profiting independently with very limited interference from the government. Venezuela, a de facto Socialist nation, plainly supports the idea of the government providing numerous necessities to its citizens. Therefore, little government action in businesses is a hinderance. In Anthem, it is a similar situation; based on collectivism, society determined the occupation of citizens. These jobs consisted of products beneficial to everyone in the society, and any object not accepted by all is blasphemy. Also, both governments are in denial that their policies will bring them forward, and those who think discretely are vacuous. When in fact, these administrations’ laws are stagnating society and the citizens themselves. These leaders are essentially assuming their roles as dictators; as a result, they have the authority to enact any laws, whether they are progressive or stagnant. With this greater influence, they perceive themselves as intelligent and the right leader for the civilization; as opposed to the people themselves. It is quite evident that Venezuela and Anthem possess leaders meeting these criterias. In Venezuela, President Maduro used his power to obstruct opposition claiming his laws are ineffective and actually destructive. Also, when criticized, President Maduro made numerous excuses, stating that the administration is not the source of the issue. One country being the main target of threats: the United States of coup attempts and oil conflicts. As for Anthem, the citizens basically are unintelligent from birth. With the society brainwashing generations of their people, it resulted in people stalling in development and knowledge. Only those who “shine” in the eyes of the council will flourish in their collective civilization. Also, when Equality presented the council with electricity, they referred to the