His reference in the passage to "this fellow Balzac" showcases the casual addressing of another which implies that Luo considers Balzac as an equal or worse (62). This apparent attitude embodies the idea of Luo portraying himself superior to the laymen villagers. The phrase “carried away in a dream” suggests that Luo downplays the Seamstress’s admiration of Balzac and implies that the Little Seamstress is incapable of thoroughly deciphering the deeper meaning of the book but rather is wholly concerned with the just the excitement of the story (62). When Luo says, “(which looked very good on her, I must say)”, it signifies a shift because he changes his focus towards her beauty and emphasizes her beauty rather than her intelligence (62). The line following that phrase continues to reflect the shift and is said as if Luo was scoffing at the Little Seamstress’s remarks saying that “having Balzac’s words next to her made her feel good, and also more intelligent” (62). Luo clearly undermines the actions of the Little Seamstress and the purpose behind his patronizing actions backfire when she epitomizes his lessons and decides to start a new life in the
His reference in the passage to "this fellow Balzac" showcases the casual addressing of another which implies that Luo considers Balzac as an equal or worse (62). This apparent attitude embodies the idea of Luo portraying himself superior to the laymen villagers. The phrase “carried away in a dream” suggests that Luo downplays the Seamstress’s admiration of Balzac and implies that the Little Seamstress is incapable of thoroughly deciphering the deeper meaning of the book but rather is wholly concerned with the just the excitement of the story (62). When Luo says, “(which looked very good on her, I must say)”, it signifies a shift because he changes his focus towards her beauty and emphasizes her beauty rather than her intelligence (62). The line following that phrase continues to reflect the shift and is said as if Luo was scoffing at the Little Seamstress’s remarks saying that “having Balzac’s words next to her made her feel good, and also more intelligent” (62). Luo clearly undermines the actions of the Little Seamstress and the purpose behind his patronizing actions backfire when she epitomizes his lessons and decides to start a new life in the