ABSTRACT
Within the past decade we have witnessed a series of new developments and an enormously growing interest in the understanding of human behaviour, especially when it comes to the basic principles of human mate choice. Mate preference is something which is often considered a very individual choice and appears to be influenced by cultural and economic norms. However, on the basis of numerous research works, it is a today’s acceptation that attractiveness represents a signal resulting from sexual selection. Although we have different preference for facial expression, body shape or height, recent findings suggest that mate preferences are mainly cued on certain visual signals and might reveal genetic quality to prospective mates.
In this paper those findings will be reviewed by highlighting which visual characters of the face and body affect our choice for a partner. Also influences through cultural and economical norms as well as the influence of the media will be considered in order to evaluate the hypothesis whether attractiveness is based on visual signals or is lying in the eye of the beholder.
Key words: mate choice, sexual selection, facial beauty, body features, beauty standards
CONTENTS
1. ‘WHAT IS BEAUTIFUL IS GOOD?’ – AN INTRODUCTION - 1 - 2. ON THE TRACES OF BEAUTY: JDUGMENT AND BENEFIT OF ATTRACTIVE FACES - 3 - 2.1 The average face (‘averageness hypothesis’) - 3 - 2.2 The influences of symmetry and why symmetric faces are attractive - 5 - 2.3 Sexual dimorphism and single characteristic of male and female faces - 6 - 3. BODY FEATURES - 8 - 4. CULTURAL AND MEDIA INFLUENCES - 10 - 5. CONCLUSION - 10 - 6. REFERENCES - 13 -
1. ‘WHAT IS BEAUTIFUL IS GOOD?’ – AN INTRODUCTION
Beauty is a topic, which has fascinated mankind for centuries. Poetry, art, philosophy or, since modern times,
References: Anderson, J. L., Crawford, C. B., Nadean, J. & Lindberg, T. (1992). Was the Duchess of Windsor right ? A cross-cultural review of the sociobiology of ideals of female body shape. Ethology and Sociobiology 13, 197–227. Brown et al. (2008). Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, no. 35, 12938–12943, www.pnas.org Cunningham, M Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London. (from: http://www.darwin-online.org.uk) Dion, K Galton, F. (1878). Composite portraits, made by combining those of many different persons in a single resultant figure. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 8, 132–144. Grammer, K. & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens ) facial attractiveness and sexual selection : the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108, 233–242. Grammer K., Fink B., Møller A. P., Thornhill R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol. Rev., 78, 385–407 Hughes, S Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behaviour 22, 251–267. Johnston, V. S (2006). Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty. Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10, 9-13 Little, A Little, A. C., Jones, B. C. (2006) Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 273, 3093–3099 Little, A Maisey D S., Vale E., Cornelissen P.L., Tovée M.J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. THE LANCET, Vol 353, p 1500 Perrett, D Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226. Rubenstein, A.J., Kalakanis, L., Langlois, J.H. (1999). Infant Preferences for attractive faces: A cognitive explanatiom.Developmental Psychologie, Vol. 35, No. 3, 848-855 Singh, D Singh, D., 1995. Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 69 (6), 1089–1101. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty: averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature 4, 237–269. Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 266, 211–218.