Preview

Blaise Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1337 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Blaise Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God
One of the greatest unanswered questions, is the existence of the greatest being, GOD. There are so many reasons why people believe in GOD. It doesn’t matter which side you are in this argument. I agree with Pascal with that it’s better to believe in him than not because there’s more to gain than not if you don’t believe and he exists you don’t go to “heaven”, and if you believe and he doesn’t exist you don’t lose anything. That’s the only actual way it works.

Blaise Pascal is a French philosopher that created an argument that was presented in the seventeenth-century, he came up with his most famous theory, Pascal’s wager. This theory is based on which gambling the belief in GOD existence. Overall Pascal argues that a rational person should
…show more content…
second, what is the size of the payoff?” Higher chances of winning with a high chance of receiving the payoff is a good deal, most often lottery tickets are not really a good deal. In the head of Pascal, he claims that by believing in GOD it's infinitely better than not. If the lottery ticket chances were 1/100 and the ticket price was $1 and the payoff was 1 billion dollars its logical to buy the ticket. Sometime in the seventeenth century, Renee Descartes defended similar arguments. For example, the proof of the existence of GOD is to conceive a supremely perfect being. He continues to say that “there is no less contradiction conceiving a supreme being who lacks existence than there is conceiving a triangle whose interior angles do not sum 180 degrees hence one must conclude He exists.” …show more content…
This argument originating with Greek philosopher Epicurus, the logical argument from evil is as follows. If GOD is perfectly good, GOD is omniscient and omnipotent. Evil exists, if GOD was perfectly good, omniscient, and omnipotent then Evil wouldn’t exist. Which makes 100% right there wouldn’t be so much evil in this world if GOD exists but it does. For me, this argument isn’t complete because GOD created Lucifer and he is the definition of evil. Lucifer the creator of all evil that’s the only thing that makes sense. It’s the Devil against GOD which is translated to Good vs. Evil. God made the devil as powerful as him. Therefore, Evil exists for God (Good) to overcome in other words evil exists to test someone’s faith. There are two types of evil moral and natural the difference is moral evil is between stealing or not. Natural evil is more like earthquakes and tornadoes things humans can’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One argument for the existence of God is the basic design argument. It states that: the world has purpose and order, the complexity of the universe shows evidence of design, such design needs a designer, the only designer of something as great as the universe is God. This provides evidence for the existence of God as natural objects, such as the human eye, are so complex that the chance of them occurring randomly are so minute that it is much more likely that the eye had a designer. This is because each individual part of the eye must be the exact right size and in a specific condition to be able to function at all. A designer who is capable of designing something so detailed must be omnipotent – no question. The only possible being who is able to create something so divine must be God. Therefore the Basic argument shows evidence for the existence of God.…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pascal’s Wager is his attempt to justify the belief in God purely on appeal to possible personal gains. His argument is that it makes sense to believe in the God that is believed in by Christianity, therefore it makes sense for us to do so. Pascal believes that belief in God is the rational action to take, even if there is no evidence of God existing. In his work he finds various reasons to believe in God that are beneficial even if he/she does not exist. He also believes it is irrational to not believe in God. If you are an atheist you ultimately are missing out on the possibility of eternal happiness, because if there is no God you will not lose anything, but you will lose everything if there is a God.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The question of evil is a common hot button topic among atheists and non-Christians who attempt to disprove Christianity. They argue that an omnipotent and omniscient God cannot exist in a world with so much evil. The argument is used by them to try to prove that Christianity is “internally self-contradictory and thereby to be rejected.” Many claim that a benevolent and caring God would certainly not create evil or allow it to flourish in the world that He created. So, the problem of evil is how to explain that there can be a perfect, all-powerful, and all-loving God that exists in a world with so much moral and natural evil.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pascal s Wager

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pascal’s Wager is that of whether or not to believe in God. What are the benefits? What are the consequences? I will argue that Pascal’s Wager is indeed persuasive to believing in God due to the appeal of one’s emotions and desires. One may object that Pascal is not thoroughly persuasive regarding that the belief in God’s existence is greater than not believing, but I will continue to argue that it is, and it can only offer the better reward.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wager itself is not an argument made to prove the existence of God, choosing to believe in God, or choosing to not believe in any god, does not prove or disprove the existence of God. According to the French philosopher, Gabriel Marcel, neither the existence nor the non-existence of God can be proven, and neither is one more rationale than the other, yet both are a result of faith. Deciding whether or not to devote your life to a deity, is an important decision, one that should not be made lightly. Pascal’s wager should not be the be-end-all of your quest to seek the right god, or the right faith, but should be a jumping point, would God accept your ‘belief’ if your faith was only what you thought to be the ‘best decision’? Do atheist go to heaven?…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the objections to the argument from evil, I took the free will argument as the strongest. Let’s first exam the argument from evil, and see how the free will argument irrationalize it.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pascal’s Wager Pascal argued that all men should believe in God for their own good. The wager is based on an assumption that says, if God exist, there will be infinite goodness for believers, and infinite badness for nonbelievers. He also assumed that all men must choose between believe in God or not. His reasons were easy to follow: If God does exist, nonbelievers will be doomed to infinite suffering of the hell. Whereas believers will enjoy infinite pleasure of the haven.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are different types of evil that are allowed in this world. The first is moral evil, which began in the garden of Eden when Eve ate the fruit off the tree and deliberately disobeyed God in an act of sin and evil (Gen. 3)(Elwell, pg 412). The next is natural evil; this is explained mainly in natural disasters such as, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and disease. Elwell writes, “natural evil is the consequence of moral evil,” then goes onto explain that natural evil is not distinct…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He follows this by claiming that existing is more perfect than not existing, thus God must exist. He begins his second argument for God’s existence by saying that it is an innate idea which everybody has that God is an infinite being. Next, Descartes claims that because we think of God as a being that is infinite God has infinite reality. He continues by saying that something cannot come from nothing, and that something cannot come from a thing that has less reality than itself. Descartes concludes by reasoning that because only God has infinite reality God alone could have been the cause of the idea of an infinite and perfect being, therefore God exists.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, I will prove to you that Pascal’s wager is one everyone should consider since as Pascal states, we have absolutely nothing to lose, and everything to gain. To begin, Pascal suggests a decision theory where he refers to the belief of God as a coin toss, with only two possible outcomes, it is either heads or tails, or in Pascal’s case,…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way Pascal and Descartes were similar, was that they both used math and logic to argue their points. Pascal argues for the reasonableness of faith, and examines faith and believing God in the form a wager or bet. Based on the concept of risk and reward, Pascal argues that it simply makes more sense to believe in God. If one believes in God and there is no God, nothing is lost, and if God is real, everything (eternal life and happiness) is gained. However, if one does not believe in God and if God is real, one loses everything.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leibniz's Problem Of Evil

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When something is corrupted, its corruption is an evil because it is so much a privation of the good. Whenever things are consumed by corruption not even the corruption remains for it is nothing to itself having no subsistent in which exist. From this it follows that there is no evil if there is no good. A good that does not have an evil aspect is perfectly good. Even if there is a little bit of evil in something its good turns out to be defective. Thus, leading to that there cannot be good without evil. Per the logical problem of evil, it is impossible for god and an evil being to coexist. If evil exist then god cannot exist, since evil exist it follows that god does not exist. The problem with this argument is that there’s no logically reason to think that god and evil are logically incompatible. Most atheists purpose that god cannot have a morally sufficient reason to allow all the evils we have in the world. But this assumption is not true. For if it is possible that god has morally suffient reasons for evil to exist then it follows that god and evil are able to co-exist, and that does seem logically possible. The populistic problem of evil according to this problem the “ co-existence of god and…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Evil Research Paper

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The problem of evils argues that if God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient, then evil should not exist in the world. This argument claims that suffering exists in the world, such as war, famine, plague and so on. Also, this argument doubts the existence of God, and atheists come up with some contradictions about the existence of God. If God is omniscient, he must know there is suffering in the world, and people are in suffering. If God is omnipotent, he must be able to shut down all the suffering or save people form the…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Problem Of Evil

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I would like to explain one essential prospective on the problem of evil. The Problem of Evil is both a philosophical and spiritual threat. It implies that the creator of the world is imperfect and unsound. What is the Problem of Evil? Evil is problematic because there is evil in the world. The problem is there is not equilibrium between good and evil in the world. Simply, how can there be a God that is all good and all-knowing and all powerful at the same time that evil exists? How can there be a caring and compassionate God when evil exists in the world? It appears to be illogicality in the notion of God. God is believed to be all good and all powerful, nevertheless; creates or allows or permits evil to exist. This could not be further…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belief in God

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Blaise Pascal’s believes if we do a cost-benefit analysis of the matter, we find that it is eminently reasonable to get ourselves to believe that God does exists regardless of whether we have good evidence for that belief. According to Pascal’s of “God exists” the reason is neutral. It can neither prove nor disprove it. However we must make a choice on this matter, for not to choose for God is in effect to choose against him and lose the benefits that belief would bring. Pascal’s says God does exist, if God exists, then there is an infinite gain with minimal finite loss. If God does not exist, then there is only an overall finite loss in term of sacrifice of earthly goods.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays