Preview

Should There Be In Blaise Pascal's Wager?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should There Be In Blaise Pascal's Wager?
Faith is like a seed; plant it in your heart. God gives the harvest at the appointed time (Mark 4:26-27,28-29). In this essay, I will explain the reasons I believe Blaise Pascal has planted an initial seed in many hearts, after his book Pensées which defends Christianity was published. In this book, Pascal states that reason alone will not decide whether or not God exists, but that you must wager. Furthermore, I will prove to you that Pascal’s wager is one everyone should consider since as Pascal states, we have absolutely nothing to lose, and everything to gain.

To begin, Pascal suggests a decision theory where he refers to the belief of God as a coin toss, with only two possible outcomes, it is either heads or tails, or in Pascal’s case,
…show more content…
Similar to flipping a coin, there is no middle of heads or tails, comparably you cannot halfway believe in God. As Pascal states, “reason can decide nothing here”, which brings me to explain that on reason alone, we cannot simply conclude that God exists. We cannot prove that God exists because we may not even understand God ourselves; He is infinitely complex. For that reason, we must wager, Pascal truly believes it is not optional. Some may say that Christians build their faith on reason, for example, they follow the Bible. I however do not believe the Bible is within reason since they are all just a gathering of stories, nobody is to say that these are truthful. To elaborate, I will prove that it isn’t optional to wager by explaining that “Wager, then, without hesitation, that He is” is a quote that will suffice in arguing since while looking at the bigger picture, one may discover that something they have loved and cared for a long period of time, turns out to be built on a lie. This deceptiveness will not lead us to believe that we have lived an unfulfilled life, since our life is not worse off because of it. Thus, one must wager, the decision to get eternal life, so why not choose the next world. One

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination is the question of the existence of God--the superlative being that philosophers have defined and dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas, the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well-thought and well-articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence, therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this debate probably never will mitigate. Many theologians and academics honestly admit that no matter what any philosopher may assert regarding this topic, whether or not a certain person believes in God's existence is a question of faith and nothing more.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pascal’s Wager was a groundbreaking theory posed by the French philosopher, mathematician, and physicist Blaise Pascal. Pascal, who is said to be the father of modern probability, felt that that religion should be approached as a gamble. It was one of the first efforts to incorporate the concept of infinity. The wager stated that, even though the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, one should wager as though God exists, because living accordingly, has essentially nothing to lose and experiences can only be beneficial. Pascal’s Wager consists of three arguments. The first is the argument from super dominance. Pascal wrote: “God is, or He is not. But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. Which will you choose then? Let us see. Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is.” In this quote, Pascal is implying that there is a possibility God exists, if one assumes God exists and he indeed does, then one has gained everything, perhaps heaven. However, if God does not exist then one has lost nothing. The Bible would merely be a mistake and He would not exist, along with Heaven or the like. Regardless, it is best to take the gamble because there is nothing to lose, according to Pascal. Pascal’s next argument was the argument from expectation. He supported this argument when he wrote: “Let us see. Since there is an equal risk of gain and of loss, if you only had to gain two lives, instead of one, you might still wager. But if there were three lives to gain, you would have to play (since you are under the necessity of playing), and you would be imprudent, when you are forced to play, not to chance your life to gain three at a game where there is an equal risk of loss and gain. But there is an eternity of life and…

    • 2458 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (2011, June). From Theoretical To Practical: Developing Tillich’s. Lumen et Vita. Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/lumenetvita/article/view/1700/1547 Smith, S. (2003). What Is Faith?:…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pascal’s Wager is his attempt to justify the belief in God purely on appeal to possible personal gains. His argument is that it makes sense to believe in the God that is believed in by Christianity, therefore it makes sense for us to do so. Pascal believes that belief in God is the rational action to take, even if there is no evidence of God existing. In his work he finds various reasons to believe in God that are beneficial even if he/she does not exist. He also believes it is irrational to not believe in God. If you are an atheist you ultimately are missing out on the possibility of eternal happiness, because if there is no God you will not lose anything, but you will lose everything if there is a God.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his arguments, Pascal attempts to illustrate the attractiveness of Christianity by describing the human condition as one of inconstancy, boredom, and anxiety when we are distant from God. In a situation without God, humans are caught in a state of uncertainty, with no stable foundation upon which a meaningful and joyous life can be founded. We are inconstant in that we find it difficult to commit ourselves to a certain issue, only partially devoting our time and thought. Since God is the ultimate ontological good that humanity seeks, without God we are left restless and dissatisfied. Thus, we quickly become bored with our present existence, forever seeking diversions and vain pleasures that might fill the void within us. However, we are ever restless and unhappy until God completes us. As a result, the more inconstancy and boredom we feel, the more anxious we get in trying to obtain some sort of satisfaction in…

    • 3555 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pascal’s Wager does not provide has some challenges in its reasoning and is not a convincing argument for one to believe in God, but it can be applicable to a catered category of people. Pascal’s Wagers main issue is that it is not an epistemic argument. Before just dismissing Pascal’s Wager as not an epistemic argument, one must understand what an epistemic argument is. An epistemic argument is an argument that must be rational, reasonable and justified in order to be believed. For instance, if one believes in God because one experienced a miracle and then claims the miracle experienced, like an apple falling from a tree into one’s hand is a sign from God, one’s argument pointing to the miracle as evidence is not applying an epistemic argument.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pascal s Wager

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pascal’s Wager is that of whether or not to believe in God. What are the benefits? What are the consequences? I will argue that Pascal’s Wager is indeed persuasive to believing in God due to the appeal of one’s emotions and desires. One may object that Pascal is not thoroughly persuasive regarding that the belief in God’s existence is greater than not believing, but I will continue to argue that it is, and it can only offer the better reward.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wager itself is not an argument made to prove the existence of God, choosing to believe in God, or choosing to not believe in any god, does not prove or disprove the existence of God. According to the French philosopher, Gabriel Marcel, neither the existence nor the non-existence of God can be proven, and neither is one more rationale than the other, yet both are a result of faith. Deciding whether or not to devote your life to a deity, is an important decision, one that should not be made lightly. Pascal’s wager should not be the be-end-all of your quest to seek the right god, or the right faith, but should be a jumping point, would God accept your ‘belief’ if your faith was only what you thought to be the ‘best decision’? Do atheist go to heaven?…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For this assignment I am going to choose two different job roles and investigate the health care sector. The job roles I have chosen are midwifery and mental health worker. For each job role I am going to explain the following requirements:…

    • 888 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pascal’s Wager Pascal argued that all men should believe in God for their own good. The wager is based on an assumption that says, if God exist, there will be infinite goodness for believers, and infinite badness for nonbelievers. He also assumed that all men must choose between believe in God or not. His reasons were easy to follow: If God does exist, nonbelievers will be doomed to infinite suffering of the hell. Whereas believers will enjoy infinite pleasure of the haven.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pascal Wager's Argument

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The existence of God has always been a commonly asked question in the world today. Since there is no scientifically proven answer, arguments have been accumulated over time. One being the Pascal Wager’s argument. This theory states that either God exists or God does not exist, you can either wager for God or wager against God. This belief advocates the belief in God rather than providing evidence. Does Pascal's Wager commit the fallacy of appealing to consequences?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of God based on religious experience. (18) 2. ‘The argument merely indicates the probability of God and this is of little value to a religious believer.’ Discuss. (12)…

    • 2406 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Will to Believe

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the second portion of James’ essay, James brings up differences in how a person renders a hypothesis due to “the actual psychology of human opinion.” He implicates that we usually use our own “passional and volitional nature” to make our judgment or belief. However, a valid hypothesis for one person may not be equally valid in the eyes of another. Hence, James argues that our belief is composed of relation of ideas that we can see and cannot see. If the idea does not exist, we cannot assume that it is given based on our belief. To illustrate his point, James gives an example of Pascal’s wager, which conveys that we have a choice to either believe in God or to disbelieve in God. According to Pascal’s wager, if we choose to believe in God, we will be blessed eternally. In contrast, if we choose not to believe in God, we will lose. James, therefore, states that this example is not a living option. In other words, the hypothesis that Pascal has offered to us is…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Advertising differences between Italy and The United States of America: A cross-cultural look at visuals in advertising Introduction Today most people find themselves inundated with advertisements. Advertisements are, of course, used as a means to sell things, but the methods used in ads varies across the world, depending on cultural differences. In this essay I will be exploring the similarities and differences between advertising in the United States of America and Italy by comparing and contrasting the visual elements used in both American and Italian ads across many forms of mass media, including television commercials, newspaper adverts, and ads on social media.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the novel, Chronicle of a Death Foretold by, Gabriel Marguez, the characters lack individualization and the communal values determine the events of the town. The characters in this novel only watch what happens but never try to stop it. The character's thought that nothing evil could happen when the bishop was coming to their town. Therefore they never believed all the threats that were made toward the main character, Nasr Santiago. The communal values evolve around religious events, having family honor and virginity.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays