Preview

Book Review Instructions Who Killed P

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
344 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Book Review Instructions Who Killed P
Book Review – Who Killed Palomino Molero?

Complete a book review of Mario Vargas Llosa’s Who Killed Palomino Molero?
The review should be 700 to 1,200 words, 12 font, double-spaced, and in Times New Roman.
Right justify the heading; left justify the title in APA reference format.

Llosa’s work has been seen by some as an indictment of the corrupting influence of both class and race in 1950s Peruvian life. The thesis of your review should focus on either the concept of class and how it may be perpetuated not only by those in power but also by the very people that are negatively impacted by it or an opposing position, i.e., the concept of class has no basis in contemporary American society.
One fourth to one third of the review should summarize the book. This summary does not have to be the first part or portion of the review and can be incorporated into the review as appropriate. I would also suggest that the author’s own background may also be of value in writing your review.
To understand the format of this review, I suggest reading some book reviews from the New York Times Sunday Book Review, The New York Review of Books or another source of reviews. If you go to www.aldaily.com and roll down the page, you will find numerous links to various book review sources in the left hand margin under Book Reviews. Read a few to get the feel of a competent review.
If you express an opinion as to the book itself, do not tell me how “good” or “bad” it is, instead tell me why you thought it was good or bad.

Note – You are required to use the Writing Lab to assist you. You will need to visit the Writing lab twice (I recommend seeing the same individual on both occasions), attaching the two Writing lab worksheets to the back of your submitted work.

Reminder – Feel free to use the internet for background but do not use any wording or ideas from online reviews.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This book is also a book that changed me as a reader I haven't stopped reading books since this book. I absolutely love this book even tho it does have some bad stuff. But even because of all that stuff I still absolutely love the book. Next I will be telling if I think the book should be banned or not.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before you begin, save this document to your computer desktop. You will need to enter your scores in the “10-Key Numeric Keypad” section, and the “Timed Writings” section (found at the end of this assignment document), then submit the document with timed writing scores included, to the assignment drop box.…

    • 625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A critique of the book is included. The critique includes questions that the author should have addressed/considered. It should be about 1 page.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critique I liked this book because it was interesting and you don’t know what will happen next. This book leaves you hanging. I like books with drama and this book has a lot of it. I also like how it was in third person point of view, so it switched between different people.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    McMinn 4MAT review

    • 1815 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1 Summary: After listing the name of the book and author, summarize the book concisely in 500 “tight” words (no more than 2 pages). Prove that you comprehend the reading by writing a no-nonsense summary. The summary is not a commentary or listing of topics, but rather a heartfelt, condensed, insightful synopsis of the longer, more elaborate book. Cite the book in text at least once per paragraph, and include page numbers for direct quotations.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It should be at least 500 words. It will be graded using the rubric on the back of this page.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Summary: After listing the name of the book and author, summarize the book concisely in 500 “tight” words (no more than 2 pages). Prove that you comprehend the reading by writing a no-nonsense summary. The summary is not a commentary or listing of topics, but rather a heartfelt, condensed, insightful synopsis of the longer, more elaborate book. Cite…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It had humor, real life events, sadness, and suspense. I would most definitely recommend this novel to someone because although it’s very long, you won’t want to stop reading it. This book will make you wonder, cry, even laugh. It’s a book that I think had great meaning and was put together very well. In my opinion, there is no flaws about this book except how long it is.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These questions should act as a reading guide and are not intended to replace careful reading of the novel's themes and development.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Puritan Dilemma

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I wouldn't recommend this book to the average reader. It is a bit hard to read because the author goes into so much depth that the reader could very often forget the main idea. It is a good, informative book but a bit drawn out.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a much more useful and well-balanced review, combining a brief overview of the book’s content with comments concerning the book’s organizational structure, chapter design, relevance for today’s readers, production values, and other features of the book. Gall’s review provides exactly the kind of information I would be looking for when it comes to purchasing a product. Another nice feature of Gall’s review is a parenthetical reference to other titles by the author reviewed in Horn Book Magazine that may be useful when deciding to order multiple titles from the same author. Interestingly, Gall never explicitly recommends the book for purchase in the text of his review, though his approval of the title is strongly implied and reinforced by the presence of a star in front of the title at the top of the review. As a would-be purchaser of a book, I appreciate when a reviewer helps me learn exactly what to expect from a product when I order it, and Gall’s vivid attention to detail concerning the physical and textual characteristics of the book definitely fill the void lacking in Sumser’s…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voltaire Candide

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This paper is based solely on thoughts and personal critique of the book. Not necessarily a summary or research paper.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    contains various reviews for books that have had a great influence. The intended audience for the source is for all readers of the book…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bear Grylls

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each aspect has been devoted a new chapter, which balances out this book really well. This book teaches you a LOT actually provided you are ready to introspect and compare your life with the things mentioned in the book. There are a couple of things that I absolutely loved about the book and I am definitely going to implement them in my life.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Loyalty Article

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages

    SAMPLE GUIDELINES FOR CRITICAL BOOK REVIEW Preliminary Considerations First, one must understand that a critical book review is not a book report (a summary of the contents of a book). A critical book review is a vehicle for examining and discussing issues the book itself raises or fails to raise. One writes a critical book review for the benefit of those who might not presently have time to read the book but who nevertheless need to learn more about its basic approach should they desire to read or study it at a future time. The job of the book reviewer is to inform these readers concerning any merits and/or shortcomings the book may have. From information based on a well-written review, the reader may conclude that this book is either indispensable or inconsequential. Components of a Critical Book Review A. Give complete bibliographical information at the top of the page (title, author, publisher, place of publication, date of publication, number of pages, and name of reviewer). Use the following format: Toward Rediscovering the Old Testament, by Walter C. Kaiser, Jr. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, l987. 250 pages. Reviewed by Randy C. Slocum. B. Briefly state the reason this book was chosen for review. State the author's credentials (education, place of employment, previous achievements, etc.) as a preface to giving the book a serious hearing. Biographical information about the author should be included only as it demonstrates the author’s competency to write the book. Within the context of the paper, do not use titles (Dr., Rev., etc.). In most brief reviews, you will likely need to limit the introduction to one or two paragraphs. C. Briefly (in one or two well-written sentences) summarize the thesis of the book. This is a crucial step because the thesis contains the reason why the author produced this particular book (there may be dozens on the market with similar subject matter). The thesis will state the author's basic presuppositions and approach. The critical…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays