Preview

Brief Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
371 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Brief Case
BRIEFING A CASE EXAMPLE

Student Name:
Class:
Case Number:

PATTERSON V. McLean Credit Union
491 U.S. 164 (1989)

FACTS: Patterson, a black female, worked for the McLean Credit Union as a teller and file coordinator for ten years. Patterson alleges that when she was first interviewed for her job, the supervisor, who later became the president of McLean Credit Union, told her that she would be working with all white women and they probably would not like working with her because she was black. Patterson alleges that she was subjected to a pattern of discrimination and McLean Credit Union which included her supervisor constantly staring at her while she performed her work and not doing so to white workers; not promoting her or giving her perfunctory raises as enjoyed by other white workers and no reassignment to others when she went on vacation, openly being critical of her during meetings and telling Patterson that it was known that "black workers were known to work slower than white workers and by nature that some animals are faster than other animals". When Patterson complained of this differential treatment, the supervisor told her that her only option was to quit. Patterson after ten years, was laid off. Patterson brought suit under 42 USCS 1981, alleging harassment, failure to promote and discharge because of race.

ISSSUE: Was the harassment, failure to promote and discharge because of race a violation of 42 USCS 1981?

Law: 42 USCS Section 1981 states that "all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts as enjoyed by white citizens.

ANALYSIS: None of the racially harassing conduct which McLean engaged in involved the formation of contract. It is clear that the actions of McLean occurred after the formation of the contract. Since section 1981 is specifically limited to the "making and enforcing the contract", the activities of McLean was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 531 Week 2 Team IRAC

    • 523 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many professional athletes will continue to receive a regular salary during a serious injury that was sustained during their athletic duties, but for Cirque du Soleil performers this is not the case. When a member of Cirque du Soleil gets injured on the job they are treated like normal workers and only receive workers compensation benefits that can be thousands less a year than their normal salaries as a performer. This is a problem for the performers that lay their bodies on the line to promote Cirque du Soleil's $850 million per year business.…

    • 523 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts of the Case: In early 2000, an African-American name James Daniel, Jr applied for an Executive Team Leader position with Target. He was given tests, which he passed placing him in a very high percentile of those who have been previously tested. Unfortunately he was not hired, and was given the explanation of not meeting the requirements of the position. Daniels did not receive any feedback as to what requirement he was meeting in the interviewing process. Later three other African-American applicants, Kalisa White, Ralpheal Edgeston and Cherise Brown inquired about the same position involving contact with the Store Team Leader Matthew Armiger. White sent her resume and called to schedule an…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grant Assurance 30.e: This clause requires the Sponsor to include non-discrimination language in all contracts that are subject to Title VI and 49 CFR Part 21. The Sponsor must include non-discrimination language as a covenant running with the land for any transfer of land by the Federal government. A non-discrimination covenant running with the land must also be included in any deed lease or other document transferring property acquired with AIP grants or for construction or use of space on property acquired with AIP grants. All the contracts subject to this clause must also include a list of applicable legal and administrative authorities implementing the prohibition on discrimination in this Grant Assurance and Title VI.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue: Plaintiff Anucha Brown Sanders is suing defendants MSG, Isiah Lord Thomas, and James Dolan, alleging that she was discriminated on the basis of her sex and terminated in retaliation for her sexual harassment complaint against MSG and Thomas. MSG counterclaimed against plaintiff for breach of fiduciary duty.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter was one of the very few female supervisors at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Alabama, and she worked at that plant for nineteen years, from 1979 till her retirement in 1998. Initially, when she started working for the company, her pay was equal to that of the other male supervisors. However, as time passed the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark: the lowest she received was $3,727 per month, while the lowest paid male received $4,286. Thus, after realizing this Mrs. Ledbetter filed an official complaint before the EEOC in March 1998, stating that Goodyear violated the Title VII as they paid her a discriminatory low salary due to her sex. After she filed an official complaint, her case went to trial, and the jury concluded that the pay disparity was due to intentional discrimination. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, as it claimed Mrs. Ledbetter’s’ case was not filed in time, as the original discriminatory pay decision occurred before the statutory limitations of 180 days.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Huck was discriminated because he was on a wheelchair and didn’t get the same benefit as other humans who are in the back rows. He didn’t have the choice of seats which was available to others so basically for him to watch a movie; he would have to sit in the front row of the theatre. They also said if he wanted to sit at the back rows, he would have to get up but he’s a disability person. He didn’t have the opportunity like others.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal issue in this case is about David Dunlap the plaintiff who has been faced with discrimination on the basis of race in the interview at Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) during the employment process of this company. Mr. Dunlap is an African American man whom has worked for many years as foreman through contract for the union. He has worked as a contractor with the union at Tennessee Authority as a boiler man for over twenty years including fifteen years as a foreman. He has applied for employment at TVA numerous times since 1970 and was not once offered an interview. Mr. Dunlap has established that regardless of experience and during the hiring development, the company has allowed racial favoritism. The court has to recognize if the business is legally responsible under title VII of the civil rights act of 1964 for racial bias with intent. Mr. Dunlap has claimed the case under disparate impact and disparate treatment investigation. (Walsh, 2010)…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manner Case Summary

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plaintiff worked for the Defendant in several positions. The Plaintiff alleges twelve different incidents occurred where she was treated differently than her white co-workers. These includes incidents such as dress code violations that white employees did not receive. Another involved her supervisor advising the Plaintiff not to steal anything. There were other race-based comments such as a supervisor referring to the Plaintiff’s hair as “nappy.”…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employers are not allowed to discriminate against a potential employee based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. In the Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority case this title of the civil rights act was violated. An African American man named David Dunlap who gave almost the exact same answers as white candidates who got the job and who had 20 years of experience in boiler making was not chosen for any of the 10 positions available with the TVA. The issue is not only that he wasn’t hired but based on the score sheet he was highly discriminated against. When asked how many days he missed Dunlap told the employers that he never missed days unless sick or having a family emergency, two other candidates who just so happened to be white gave almost the exact same answer. On the score sheet for this question Dunlap was given a score of 3.7 while the other two potential employees were given scores of 4.2 and 5.5. Also when he was asked about how many accidents he had in the field he replied none and was given a low score but another candidate whom had at least two accidents was given a higher score than Dunlap. The issue at hand was that, his score sheet was heavily manipulated putting him in number 14 out of the 21 candidates that had applied. The top ten got hired.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williamson V Houston

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The IAD investigation determined that there was no basis for Williamson’s allegations. Williamson sued the City of Houston under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act for hostile work environment sexual harassment and for retaliation against her for reporting the harassment. In a District Court, a jury found the city liable for both sexual harassment and for retaliation. Williamson was awarded back pay and compensatory damages, as well as court costs and attorney’s fees. On appeal to the Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, the City of Houston challenged the judgment on the grounds that it did not have notice of the harassment until April 1992 and that her notification to her supervisor should not have constituted notice to the city. The District Court’s ruling was affirmed by the Appeals Court. 3. Main Issue: Can a supervisor’s knowledge of harassing behavior be imputed to the city to show that the city knew, or should have known, of the harassing behavior and can therefore be held liable for failing to stop the behavior? 4. Court Deciding: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. 5. Decision: Summary judgment affirming the decision of the District…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    IRCA

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis: The city argues that it has three somewhat interwoven compelling interests in implementing the diversity policy. First, it argues that is has a compelling interest in eliminating de facto segregation in the fire department. Second it contends that there is a compelling interest in securing the educational, sociology and job performance benefits of diverse fire companies. Thirdly, it argues that the policy is required by the 1980 Consent Decree, compliance with which constitutes a compelling interest. The remedying past discrimination is not inapplicable in this case. Educational and Sociological benefits of diverse fire companies, however the mission of fire department is not to educate, its mission is the control, fighting and extinguishment of any conflagration which occurs within the city limits. The benefits of diversity as set forth by the city are not a compelling interest that justifies its diversity policy. Compliance with the 198 consent decree, the decree establishes policies and benchmarks for the hiring and promotion of minority firefighters. This case is not about remedy intentional discrimination in the Newark Fire Department ability to extinguish fires. It is about…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the worker quit before the contract was over without a good cause then the worker would have give back all of the money they got payed from the owner which is awful because blacks could get injured and the owner would not care and want the money they payed them back. Even if it was one day before the contract was over, but the owner would have really cruel to have done that. If the worker violated the contract than any white can arrest him and bring the black to jail. Blacks that were under the age of eighteen that did not have parents to provide and take care of them then the original owner can take the minor into their home and be their legal guardian. The owner was not allowed to give the minor cruel punishment. If whites see blacks who don 't come to work, get drunk in public, leave families, or misuse their money earned then they can be fined one hundred dollars and will have to go to jail no longer than ten days. If whites caught blacks over the age of eighteen living with whites or if they don 't have a job then the blacks would be fined fifty dollars and go to jail no more than ten days. The whites would be fined…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays