Preview

Bruce Tuckman's Five Stage Development Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1136 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bruce Tuckman's Five Stage Development Model
Although coxswains follow the guidance of the coaches, their role is one in which they are asked to motivate and inspire confidence within their rowers, whether it’s their own crew or any other that is a part of the rowing team; their focus is purely on the people – as a coxswain your purpose is ultimately to keep the end goal in their rower’s mind, but you are also expected to look after your rowers. This ranges from ensuring they get to their races on time and they are resting, eating and drinking in between their time on water, to calming nerves and easing disappointment when their performance was below what they had expected from themselves. Coxswains also have to be incredibly adaptive to the environment. The environment is in constant …show more content…
As a team, we were lucky to have already had a couple years’ experience with each other, in which we had gone through the team building stages of forming, storming, and norming; so at this point of time we were in the “performing” stage. These team development stages mentioned are a part of a 5 stage development model by Bruce Tuckman, and is seen to be something every team/group takes throughout the life span of their purpose. First the form, where they become orientated with each other and their tasks; storming follows, in which the team faces internal conflicts as things settle down and everyone tries to find their position in the team dynamics; the stage that follows in norming, where everything settles down with a sense of focus as the team learns the best way to achieve their goals; next is the performing stage where the team takes everything they’ve learnt in the previous stages and put it to use to achieve their goals. This stage is a stage occasionally repeated alongside the norming stage as teams adjust to different goals. This is something you would see with a rowing team, as every regatta had a new focus, a new level of pressure and a new level of expectation. One of the reasons we worked effectively throughout our time in the “performing” stage is because of our team cohesiveness (the degree to which we were motivated to stay as a group, in term being a defining factor our motivation to perform in our sport). As a team we met six of the seven determinants of cohesiveness, as listed by Robbins, Millett, Cacioppe and Waters-Marsh (2001, pp.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 591

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, here is a summary of the development stages of a team. In the forming stage, team members come togetherand form initial impressions. They socialize in order to get to know each other and bond with other team members. In the storming stage, team members experience hostility and infighting over tasks and how the team works. In the norming stage, team members start to come together and realize what needs to be accomplished. In the performing stage, team members are well-organized and well-functioningand maintain a positive balance. In the adjourning stage, team members achieve closure when the project is accomplished.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    MGT 3100 Project 2

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The original stage of team building is the forming stage. In this stage our group was not exactly sure what this project would entail and what work was ahead of us. We were all polite and on our best behavior making contact with the rest of the group. There was a positive and high expectation that we would be successful and develop an outstanding service learning project. In this stage our roles were not clearly defined. This lead to us mostly working independently and gaining an understanding for the project and what to expect for ourselves.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Chair and the Shaper: The role of the chair is different from the role of the shaper. They both have different priorities but work to achieve the same goal. The role of the chair is to coordinate the team’s effort and to ensure that all the resources needed in achieving the team’s goal is used effectively while the role of the sharper is to seek pattern in the team, push team towards and decisions made the sharper also challenges others in the team. The sharper is a dynamic team member who loves a challenge and thrives under pressure. This member possesses the drive and courage required to…

    • 3123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 31 1.3

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development every team goes through stages of development known as forming, storming, norming…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emilie Mertz Interview

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Members often set goals for not only themselves but as whole. They hold each other accountable for actions and push each other to become better, they depend on one another. Everyone has a role on her team and they work well together. They might face challenges but they know they can work together to overcome them. The Ithaca Women’s indoor track and field team has positive group dynamics. The one area of intervention I would choose be to try and get the team to mix and become more familiar with people of other events. Have outings or different forms of team bonding of the entire team. Maybe even break the team up into groups not based on their event have them complete a task and get to know one…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ba420: Mid-Term

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group cohesion is influenced by a number of factors, most notably time, size, the prestige of the team, external pressure, and internal competition. Group cohesion usually evolves gradually throughout development. The more time the group spends together, the more cohesive it will be. Smaller groups—those of five or seven members, for example—tend to be more cohesive than those of more than twenty-five, although cohesion does not decline much with size after forty or more members. Prestige or social status may also enhance a group’s cohesion. For example, the more prestigious groups, Navy Blue Angels, are highly cohesive.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P5 P7 M5

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Team cohesion is a vital thing it is what keeps the team together after the…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Teams foster strong commitment to a goal and to the team mates because their success is your success and failure is your failure…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4 MAT Review Wheelan

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wheelan (2013) identifies the four stages of team development and provides detailed explanation of how a group transforms itself from a stage one group of uncertainty into a successful, highly productive stage four team. This requires work and a thorough understanding of the many internal/external influences that can occur during each stage. A team member or leader who is well versed in these stages and who can evolve with each stage will be better equipped to deal with possible obstacles that can hinder group progress and implement practices to help the group successfully work through a particular stage. The goal is for the group to become a team that will value the importance of everyone’s contribution within the group and how it relates to the overall ability of the group to successfully accomplish the mission. As this is achieved, the work will no longer feel like a chore as team members encourage, inspire, and have fun completing tasks and achieving the desired outcome (Wheelan, 2013).…

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The features of effective team performance are set out in Brian Tuckman’s phases of team development theory, ‘Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing.’ This outlines the phases that a team will go through in order to become effective and reach maturity. At the ‘Forming’ stage of team development individual roles and responsibilities are unclear and each member of the team is concerned to avoid conflict with each other. From this point the team will go through the ‘Storming’ phase which is when they start to conflict as individuals put forward ideas which will be challenged by others in a bid to gain power and position over others. After this the ‘Norming’ phase follows and it is at this point that individual roles are defined and accepted and ground rules and conduct are agreed. After each of these stages the team then reaches the ‘Performing’ stage which is where they are all working towards the same shared goal. This theory shows that for all teams to be effective each individual needs to be clear on their role, responsibilities and shared end goal. This is achieved through positive leadership, utilising the skills of the team and addressing weaknesses to make the team more effective.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this stage team members should know one another better (start to appreciate eachothers differences and strengths) and also may bond with one another. Discussions are developing as they…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a group of people get together to do the same thing they starts to build a team, Bruce Tuckman in 1965 come up with an theory that explains how a group of people become a good team. He said that there are four stages to make a good team they are: Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing. Forming is the stage when everyone is trying to get to know each over, however is not sure of what they are doing and look to the person in charge, And also not a lot of agreement in the team. Then there is Storming this is when everyone’s trying to finder there place in the group also this is when relationship are formed meaning that it is easy to get distracted from the task on hand, Likewise it hard for the team to make decisions together. Then there’s Norming this is when they fist start to work as a good team it is easy for them to make a group decision, positions and roles in the group are respected and understood. Also this is when they may start to have fun outside of the work meeting up and doing social activities together. Last there is Performing this is when the…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foster Care Study

    • 12899 Words
    • 52 Pages

    The perceptions of competence are held to be more fragile because competence is construed on the basis of what others have done or are doing and there is greater preoccupation with the adequacy of one’s ability (Duda and Hall, 2001, p 420). Youths who feel excessive pressure to win can perceive themselves as having poor abilities, feel unattached to their teams, and feel vulnerable in the presence of teammates (Cote, Deakin, and Fraser-Thomas, 2005). With respect to team unity, the heightened inter-individual comparison and rivalry among athletes undermine the sense that one is closely connected with others. The climate of the team should foster feelings of “belongingness” and promote the satisfaction of the need for relatedness (Duda, Reinboth, 2005, p…

    • 12899 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team cohesiveness is defined as the extent to which team members are attracted to the team and motivated. It means every team member has commitment to team activities, support other team members and enjoy team’s success.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Do People Conform?

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prapavessis, H., & Carron, A. V. (1997). Sacrifice, cohesion, and conformity to norms in sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays