Preview

Bryan's View Of Evolution In Schools Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
364 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bryan's View Of Evolution In Schools Case Study
Bryan’s view was ridiculed by many who were called “the Northeastern intellectual establishment.” He stood for the forefront of many progressive victories. Without Bryan there would not be anti-evolution laws, no Scopes trial, and no Supreme Court decision.

Bryan’s attitude for evolution had three errors to it. The first error was that he made the mistake of confusing the fact of evolution with Darwin’s explanation. The second being that he misinterpreted the natural selection as a theory of survival. The final error would be that he argued that Darwin’s theory implied that moral virtuousness of deathly struggle.

In Bryan’s campaign against evolution in schools, he had three main ideas. His first idea was that Darwinism was the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Darwin realized that his theory of natural selection would not work unless the genetic…

    • 1857 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    William Jennings Bryan, born in 1860, was a railroad lawyer, as well as a politician and a very respected public speaker. The reason he was so successful at what he did was mainly due to the fact that he knew how to reach out to specific types of people, essentially by empathize with them. He was able to speak in front of religious groups that he did not necessarily worship the same religion with, within their religious institutions, and he was able to connect with each and every one of the audience members through his oratory skills (Lecture, 1/26/18). William Jennings Bryan and his coalition were the main reason as to why the Democratic Party came into existence, however he himself, as well as his coalition were under a lot of scrutiny for a very long time. He promoted the idea of reform, especially that which is economic, however other parties found this as abnormal, and destabilizing to the American nation (Lecture, 1/26/18). This essay will examine the ways in which William Jennings Bryan used the notion of…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the infamous Scopes Trial of 1926. Twenty-four year old high school teacher John Thomas Scopes of Dayton, Tennessee decided to test a law called the Butler Act. Many teachers felt that honor and academic freedom along with the separation of church and state were at risk. In y 1925 Scopes was accused of teaching Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to his class which violated the Butler Act of 1925. Scopes was provoked by the American Civil Union Act because of their promise to pay for the defense of anyone willing to violate the Butler Act. The trial brought upon two outstanding lawyers of the time, William Jennings Bryan (three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist) in prosecution and Clarence Darrow (leading member of American Civil Liberties Union and famous for world renown criminal defense) in defense. It was believed by most scientists that biology could not be taught without making some sort of reference to the theory of evolution, but being that the people of Tennessee were such strong believers of the bible, many of the Christian Fundamentalist saw that the theory of evolution denied their religious beliefs. This trial was definitely a conflict between religion and science; hence the people of Tennessee were gravely angered by the teachings of Darwin’s theory because it contradicted the creation of man that was stated in the bible. This case was a watershed in this religion-science conflict that eventually led to three major following the trial: The Butler Act was discontinued, the Scopes Trial upheld defeat of religion over science, and the trial reflected the social conflict that took place in the American Society during the 1920s.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, on July 1st 1925, one of the best lawyers in the country sat down in Criminal Court of Tennessee. On one hand, William Jennings Bryan, three-time presidential candidate, argued for the prosecution. The narrow legal argument offered by the prosecution was that Scopes’ guilt was a matter of incontestable fact and logic: The state had outlawed the teaching of evolution, Scopes admitted publicly that he had taught evolution, therefore Scopes was guilty. Also, after the World War I., Bryan proposed that the Darwinism (he, actually, meant Social Darwinism) was behind excessive militarism and imperialism, which were one of the sins of Bryan’s political theology. Lastly, Bryan did not possess any sympathy for the evolution as he stated:…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scopes Trial Essay Example

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Scopes Trial was the Tennessee legal case involving the teaching of evolution in public schools. A statute was passed (Mar., 1925) in Tennessee that prohibited the teaching in public schools of theories contrary to accepted interpretation of the biblical account of human creation. John T. Scopes, a biology teacher, was tried (July, 1925) for teaching Darwinism in a Dayton, Tenn., public school. Clarence Darrow was one of Scopes's attorneys. Darrow argued that academic freedom was being violated and claimed that the legislature had indicated a religious preference, violating the separation of church and state. He also maintained that the evolutionary theory was consistent with certain interpretations of the Bible, and in an especially dramatic session he sharply questioned Bryan on the latter's literal interpretation. Scopes was convicted, partly because of the defense, which refused to plead any of the technical defenses available, fearing an acquittal on a technical rather than a constitutional basis. Scopes was, however, later released by the state supreme court on a technicality. Although the outcry over the case tended to discourage enactment of similar legislation in other states, the law was not repealed until 1967. William Jennings Bryan, three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist, led a Fundamentalist crusade to banish Darwin's theory of evolution from American classrooms. Bryan's motivation for mounting the crusade is unclear. It is possible that Bryan, who cared deeply about equality, worried that Darwin's theories were being used by supporters of a growing eugenics movement that was advocating sterilization of "inferior stock." More likely, the Great Commoner came to his cause both out a concern that the teaching of evolution would undermine traditional values he had long supported and because he had a compelling desire to remain in the public spotlight--a spotlight he had occupied since his famous "Cross of Gold" speech at the…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * A hero and idolized politician to many people * Leader of the American people * Leader of the Crusade against the theory of evolution * Expert representative of the church and the…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1920s dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One reason tensions where brought up was through the new idea of evolution and the old practice of creationism. According to Document C “The World’s Most Famous Trial: Tennessee Evolution Case, 1925” This trial was a case about whether there should be a punishment for teaching the Darwinism in the schools. This case involved John Scopes, a biology teacher, who taught Darwinism (theory of evolution). Scopes was found guilty. This case sparked a worldwide debate on academic freedom in the schools. This showed how old and new ideas eventually clashed.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Why were Americans so alarmed at the growth of big business as described in Chapter 17? Consider that no other western country made antitrust a major issue. What were the implications of big business for American individualism? American concepts of equality? American democracy? The forces leading to economic concentration in industry (thus leading to monopoly). What were Americans reactions to big business as well as the different approaches taken by various reformers and critics of big business, including government attempts to regulate business. What might I mean, “with rapid industrialization came rapid urbanization”? Describe some of the problems associated with the growth of large urban centers.…

    • 758 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jennings-Bryan was the seemingly perfect candidate for the fundamentalist lawyer, as his devout faith and good political campaigns gave him the nickname “The Great Commoner”. This case would become the capstone of his very prestigious career, and serve as a structural backbone for his previous views on evolution which were illustrated by his participation in the World Christian Fundamentals Association, and having quotes such as “the (evolution) most paralyzing influence with which civilizations has had to deal with in the last century,… promulgated a philosophy that condemned democracy,… denounced christianity,… denied the existence of god, overturned all concepts of morality,... and endeavored to substitute the worship of the superhuman for the worship of Jehovah.” which he told the World Brotherhood Congress. The evidence was clear that Jennings-Bryan was obviously a devout Christian, and a complete opponent to the theory of evolution and anything it stood…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clarence Darrow

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Clarence Darrow is a lawyer, who is Agnostic, liberal, a defender of the underdog and fighter for civil rights. He said “I am an agnostic as to the question of God; I think that it is impossible for the human mind to believe in an object or thing unless it can form a mental picture of such object or thing.” (Agnostic 1) William Jennings Bryan was the one fighting against Clarence Darrow in this trial. William was a three time Democratic candidate for president and a populist, who also led a Fundamentalist to banish Darwin’s theory of evolution from Americans classrooms.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “Darwin’s Middle Road”, Stephen Jay Gould describes Darwin’s process on his theory of natural selection. Gould describes the process of scientific creativity with inductivism and eurekaism. Darwin’s thought process also incorporates Frye’s three levels of the human mind. Darwin begins his thought process aboard the Beagle. During these five years, Darwin makes observations of the bones of giant South American fossil mammals. He focuses on the turtles and finches of the Galapagos. According to Gould he mentions “The first ̶ inductivism ̶ held that great scientists are primarily great observers and patient accumulators of information. For new and significant theory, the inductivists claimed, can only arise from a firm foundation of facts.” (Gould 1018). Darwin uses his consciousness and awareness; to identify and give qualities to the turtles and finches. Darwin builds his foundation of facts. Darwin transitions his thinking process to social participation. Darwin takes his facts on finches and brings them into human shape. Darwin begins researching and studying the nature of the finches. Darwin uses social participation to contribute to science. Inductivism corresponds to the first and second levels of the human mind. In addition, Darwin uses the third level of the human mind to create his theory. Darwin’s theory is survival of the fittest through natural selection. Darwin experiences…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On July 10, 1925, nearly one thousand people jammed the Rhea County Courthouse for the first day of trial. Judge Raulston, a conservative Christian who wanted publicity, was flanked by two police officers waving huge fans at him to keep air circulating. The proceedings opened to a prayer, over Darrow’s objections. A jury of twelve men was quickly selected, including ten farmers and eleven regular church-goers. Bryan opposed the teaching of evolution in public schools because he thought the people should have local control over school curriculum. As early as 1904, Bryan had regarded social Darwinism as "the merciless law by which the strong crowd out and kill off the weak." Bryan also opposed Darwinism as justification for war and imperialism. Bryan was unhappy with Darwin's assumption that the evolutionary process was without purpose and not the product of a larger design. Bryan was aware of serious scientific difficulties with Darwinism, but Bryan mistook the lack of consensus about the way that Darwin explained the evolutionary process for a lack of scientific support for the concept of evolution…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scopes Trial

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The second reason is that evolutionists could finally show examples and prove evolution. The website says, “But Clarence Darrow and the ACLU had succeeded in publicizing scientific evidence for evolution, and the press reported that though Bryan had won the case, he had lost the argument.” This shows that even though the…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The catechism as to whether or not creationism should be able in attainable schools is an absolute affecting and circuitous question. It can be looked at from several acclimatized angles, its ascendancy accepting one of them. Admitting the abbreviation of affirmation to abutment the fundamentalist absorption of creationism, that in it is not abounding to accreditation its exclusion from the best of attainable schools in the United States. The canon is far added circuitous and complex.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought about the things we teach at our public schools? How everything that is said to a student has an effect on the way they think or understand things. How are we sure that we teach them everything they need to know? And who decides the purpose or requirement of each class given? Education is to enlighten the young and naive to better their purpose in our society; and by teaching them both Evolution and Intelligent Design it give them more knowledge and a different way to look and examine things.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays