Preview

Business Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law
The following situations are similar (all involve the theft of Makoto’s laptop computer), yet they represent three different crimes. Identify the three crimes, noting the differences among them.

1 While passing Makoto’s house one night, Sarah sees a laptop computer left unattended on Makoto’s porch. Sarah takes the computer, carries it home, and tells everyone she owns it.

2 While passing Makoto’s house one night, Sarah sees Makoto outside with a laptop computer. Holding Makoto at gunpoint, Sarah forces him to give up the computer. Then Sarah runs away with it.

3 While passing Makoto’s house one night, Sarah sees a laptop computer on a desk near a window. Sarah breaks the lock on the front door, enters, and leaves with the computer.

1.In the first example Sarah has committed larceny by taking personal property that belongs to another person with the intent of claiming the property as her own.
2.In the second example Sarah has committed robbery by taken anothers property by force.
3.In this final example Sarah has committed burglary while breaking and entering.

Noting the basic differences regarding the crimes: In the first example of Larceny, which involves no force or threat to human life it would be considered the least severe penalty of the three. Burglary, because it would involve breaking and entering is not considered to be as severe as robbery, however more severe than larceny. Robbery is considered to be the most severe penalty of the three, mainly because in this situation force is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Joseph Jackson greeted Alexandra Anderson at the door and escorted her to the Genius Bar for her appointment. While doing so he observed she was precariously carrying a Mac Pro, noting, “It seemed out of the ordinary to transport a Mac Pro without a proper case”.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Anna does not have the admission fee to get into an amusement park. She convinces her friend Steven to let her hide in the trunk of his car so that she can sneak into the park. She defends her actions by saying that the loss to the amusement park is “intangible” because no one was hurt and because she did not really take anything of value. She also says that she is just a teenager who doesn’t have as much money as the rich owners of the park. Why is the theft wrong despite Anna’s feelings?…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    8:41- Shantaya sat with legs shaking, watching the computer, unresponsive, with her hands covering her face. Ms. Marcantonio asks, Shantaya, What do you want to earn?…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Scott entered into a unilateral contract with Hume. Scott used the large signboard to offer $1000 to the ballplayer who hit a homerun over the sign. This is a promise for an act. Hume completed the performance of the act by hitting the homerun over the sign and therefore the unilateral contract between them was formed.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ls311 Unit 3

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Larceny is the taking of personal property without force and without breaking and entering into a building with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of possession. Put simply, larceny is stealing or…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robbery and Extortion. Which crime, robbery or extortion, is more harmful to the victim of the crime? Discuss the similarities and the differences between these two crimes. Your primary response should examine the potential culpability of the victim for either crime. Does the fact that the victim may have done something wrong affect your viewpoint of the heinousness of either crime?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Picture A, is considered as misdemeanour, because the theft did not hurt the woman, he is only trying to steal something from the bag. However, picture B is a felony because the offender is rising a gun on a seller's man head. Assaulting is also considered as misdemeanour because the person is trying to harm the other,…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, armed robbery involves having a weapon while taking and carrying away somebody else's property by violence with…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Burglary is an offence under Section 9 of the Thefts Act, which is in 2 separate parts. The first sub section is s9(1)(a) which states “ a person is guilty of burglary if he enters any building or part of a building as a trespasser with the intent to steal, inflict grievous bodily harm, or do unlawful damage to the building or anything in it.” The second part is s9(1)(b) which says “a person is guilty of burglary if having entered a building or part of a building as a trespasser, he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or inflicts or attempts to inflict grievous bodily harm on any person in the building”. The difference between the two subsections is the intention at the time of entry. For example s9 (1)(a) the defendant must…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early times, burglary was a crime of precise definition and only under certain circumstances were acts considered criminal. Furthermore, burglary was originally defined in the old common law as “breaking and entering into the dwelling or structure of another at night with an intent to commit a felony inside”. At present, by court decisions and regulation, the characterization of the crime of burglary has evolved to include many more accurate situations. To common law writers the above progression made sense because the expansion of the original concept of security of the dwelling was in response to social…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lunch had finally arrived and luckily found some new friends, Hailey and Mackenzie. Before heading to the lunchroom she needed to stop at her locker and get her lunch money but when she reached to open it, Aliyah noticed that her lock was open. She realized what had happened when she didn't find her money nor her phone.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between section (a) and (b) is under subsection (a), the offender must intend to steal or commit other offences laid down at the time he trespasses. Under subsection (b) the intent to steal can be formed after the trespass. Section 9(1)(b) only applies to theft and GBH, but unlike s9(1)(a), also includes attempts to do either of these things. The maximum sentence is laid down in s9(3) and is 14 years imprisonment when committed in respect of a…

    • 3301 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theft Act 1970 Essay

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Denise may have committed the offence robbery. Section 8 of the Theft Act 1968 provides that (copy statue?) Robbery is theft with an aggravating factor, and from the case Forrester, Forrester [1992] Crim LR 793 (CA) , to prove robbery, all elements of the offence theft must be proven. There are in total five elements that constitute theft.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Radiohead Research Paper

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    to Page 31, you are introduced with the chapter title “OK Computer against the background of…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common Law Burglary Essay

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    So, we can already note the main difference between Common Law Burglary and Modern Burglary. Common Law Burglary required it to be night time and it also makes a lot of references to breaking and entering. Also, common law pertained mostly to an individual’s’ home. Modern Burglary includes any type of establishment at any time throughout the day. Also, instead of using the term breaking and entering, in Modern Burglary, we see more “unlawful or unauthorized entry”. There are four distinct changes when we look at the difference between Common Law and Modern Burglary. They are: “Elimination of breaking requirement, expansion of dwelling requirement, elimination of nighttime requirement, expansion of intent.” Although these changes have been made, states will still refer to Common Law Burglary in order to provide aggravating factors to the…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics