Preview

Capital Punishment Deters Murder, and Is Just Retribution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment Deters Murder, and Is Just Retribution
Capital Punishment Deters Murder, and Is Just Retribution

Capital punishment, is the execution of criminals by the state, for committing crimes, regarded so heinous, that this is the only acceptable punishment. Capital punishment does not only lower the murder rate, but it 's value as retribution alone is a good reason for handing out death sentences.
Support for the death penalty in the U.S. has risen to an average of 80% according to an article written by Richard Worsnop, entitled "Death penalty debate centres on Retribution", this figure is slightly lower in Canada where support for the death penalty is at 72% of the population over 18 years of age, as stated in article by Kirk Makir, in the March 26, 1987 edition of the Globe and Mail, titled "B.C. MPs split on Death Penalty". The death penalty deters murder by putting the fear of death into would be killers. A person is less likely to do something, if he or she thinks that harm will come to him. Another way the death penalty deters murder, is the fact that if the killer is dead, he will not be able to kill again. Most supporters of the death penalty feel that offenders should be punished for their crimes, and that it does not matter whether it will deter the crime rate. Supporters of the death penalty are in favour of making examples out of offenders, and that the threat of death will be enough to deter the crime rate, but the crime rate is irrelevant. According to Isaac Ehrlich 's study, published on April 16, 1976, eight murders are deterred for each execution that is carried out in the U.S.A. He goes on to say, "If one execution of a guilty capital murderer deters the murder of one innocent life, the execution is justified." To most supporters of the death penalty, like Ehrlich, if even 1 life is saved, for countless executions of the guilty, it is a good reason for the death penalty. The theory that society engages in murder when executing the guilty, is considered



Bibliography: 1 From: Take Notice, (Copp Clarke Pitman Ltd., 1979) page 163 2 From: Article written by David Vienneau published in the March 24, 1987 edition of the "Toronto Star", titled, Debate Agonizing for MPs. 3 From: Article written by Kirk Makir, published in March 26, 1987 edition of the "Globe and Mail", titled, BC MPs Split on Death Penalty Debate. 4 From: Article written by Hugh Winsor, published in April 29, 1987 edition of the "Globe and Mail", titled, Debate on Death Penalty placed on hold.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Allen debates firstly on the utilitarian arguments and thus possible benefits of the death penalty. Accordingly to Allen capital punishment is a deterrent and an understandable reaction of those who have been affected by the homicides. However, the significance of deterrence is unclear. Studies result only minimum support for deterrence as a consequence of executions, or what Allen in other words is trying to say: death penalty is to discourage or, scare if you will, the people from committing a murder (the death penalty in the U.S. today in practise, only applies for murder) (2), and does not have any effect. “Capital punishment remains a freakishly rare punishment” says Allen. This is a reaction to the following, if capital punishment has indeed barely sufficient deterrence or caution effects like what was just argued, it can just as well be an argument for its increased use instead of its decreased use. People do not feel alarmed enough for the consequences to prevent them from committing a murder. Clearly, it is difficult to understand the arguments from deterrence and finding a way to interpreted them sufficiently.…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Punishment, a necessary evil, is sometimes required to deter law violators from repeating their crime and to serve as an example to others who would also violate the law.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been proven that the death penalty neither reduces nor increases crime in the United States. Along with this, the execution of innocent people is not ever acceptable, and both sides recognize that. As stated by Freedman, “Capital punishment inevitably will be inflicted on the innocent.” Each of the authors disagree on the amount of innocent people that are wrongly convicted and are placed on death row, but still maintain the viewpoint that a person that did not commit the crime should not be put to death for something that they did not…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jacoby, Jeff. "When Murder is Punished with Death, Fewer Criminals Will Murder." Boston Globe, 26 Aug 2016, pp. K.5. SIRS Issues Researcher, http://sks.sirs.com.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the early 1970, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 2). The authors argue that the death penalty does not prevent others from committing the same offense. They describe how deterrence studies have failed to support the hypothesis that the death penalty is more effective at preventing criminal homicides than along imprisonment.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve Earle is just one of the many protesters of the death penalty, stating “. . . The death penalty is based on the idea that this is a democracy, and in a democracy the government is me, and if the government kills somebody then I am killing somebody.” His quote is one of many negative views people have on the death penalty. The death penalty is based around the idea that it is acceptable to execute someone for killing. However, this is disagreed on by many Americans. In a survey from the PEW Research Center, results show that 56% of Americans still support the death penalty, compared to the 62% in 2011, and the 78% in the 1996 survey. The percent of people that still support the death penalty is at an all-time low, and is drastically dropping. This is an almost surefire indication that shows society wants the death penalty to be abolished. Although the death penalty is still an option in some states, it should be discontinued because of the immorality of execution, the staggering costs, and the potential injustices such as false execution.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last capital punishment in Canada was on December 11, 1962, and after fourteen years from that date on 1976, death penalty was removed from Canadian criminal law and replaced with a mandatory life sentence. During this time some people believe that death penalty should be reinstated in Canada to decrease the rate of crime. But below are some reasons that indicate why capital punishment abolished in Canada.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have for a long time been in favor of capital punishment for convicted murderers. In a 1981 Gallup Poll, two-thirds of Americans spoke their opinion for the Death Penalty (Radelet, Akers, 1996). These polls have determined that most Americans are very clear about the issue that the Death Penalty is justified punishment for murder. The justification suggests that murderers should be executed for the killing alone, murderers should suffer, and just…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PROS AND CONS OF DEATH PENALTY CONS (AGAIST THE DEATH PENALTY) • Death Penalty fails to rehabilitate • ACLU and Murderers Penniless • Death Penalty Failed as a Deterrent • Does not Discourage Crime • Conviction of the Innocent Occurs • Fear of Death Does not Reduce Crime. • Motives for Death Penalty – Revenge PROS (FOR THE DEATH PENALTY) • Threat of Death Penalty Rate of Homicide Decreases • Crime Rate Increases • Free Will • Deterrent in 27 States • Death Feared • Innocent Executed - no Proof • Death Penalty Saves Lives • Death Penalty - Right to Live • Bible Quotes • Death Penalty Deterrent Effect • Justice •…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    of death is no more successful in reducing crime than the fear of life in prison, and is therefore…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty will only slightly lower the number of criminals since murders and violent offenders will always exist in society. However, one less violent criminal will make for a safer society. A lengthy prison term still leaves the possibility of parole and, until death, a dark cloud that will hover over society.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They represent a group that is highly unlikely to make rational decisions based on a fear of future consequences for their actions.” (Failure to Deter Crime), it can be very obviously noted that the notion of the death penalty deterring crime can be completely discredited. All the while, a form of justice is more than necessary to punish, and hopefully correct the worst of criminals, and life without parole is the answer, Death Penalty Focus vouches “The sentence (life without parole) is cheaper to tax-payers and keeps violent offenders off the streets for…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    As you read, consider the following questions: 1. According to the 2006 study conducted by the RAND Corporation, what affects whether the death penalty is sought as punishment for a crime? 2. What are the three findings of Joanna M. Shepherd's analysis of data from 1977 to 1999 on the death penalty? 3. Based on research conducted by H. Naci Mocan and R. Kaj Gittings, how many murders result from each commutation of a death row sentence? While opponents of capital punishment have been very vocal in their opposition, Gallup opinion polls consistently demonstrate that the American public overwhelmingly supports capital punishment. In Gallup's most recent poll, 67 percent of Americans favor the death penalty for those convicted of murder, while only 28 percent are opposed. From 2000 to the most recent poll in 2006, support for capital punishment consistently runs a 2:1 ratio in favor. Despite strong public support for capital punishment, federal, state, and local officials must continually ensure that its implementation rigorously upholds constitutional protections, such as due process and equal protection of the law. However, the criminal…

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Community Justice

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deterrence – If punishment is strict enough, people know, people will be deterred from committing further crimes…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics