Cars Vs Driverless Cars Essay
New technology today has provided us with some crazy cool things. We have iPhones, hoverboards, self-opening doors and now self driving cars. Driverless cars should be on roads because they prevent car accidents, are self-evident and efficient.
“Google has a fleet of driverless cars since 2009, and they’ve been driven over a half of a million miles without a crash” according to Jamie Page Deaton and Kristen Hall-Geisler in the article ‘Cars of tomorrow-still not fling.’ Humans get into an accident every a half a million miles, this shows that driverless cars are a safer alternative. These cars had a 3D model brain that is accurate to the centimeter because 64 laser beams take about one million measurements per second. They also contain a radar, camera, and GPS. …show more content…
Driverless cars are self-efficient so the “driver” can basically do whatever they would like to do. They can eat, apply makeup, reply to a text message, sleep, read a book for God’s sake all while getting where they need to be. The Cauffer’s price will drop down from $75,000 dollars so it could be adopted by most divers. “By leaving the driving to a whole new slew of computers, sensors, servos, and software, getting fr0m home to office would be rendered accident free.” according to Tony Borroz in the article ‘The pros and cons of a driverless future’.
Driverless cars are very efficient. When more than driverless cars on the road they use their 3D brain to signal the other cars and “will not suddenly stop, so the gaps between can be shorted” said Tony Borroz. “Intelligent roadways will allow the timing of traffic density and speed.” Some may say that cars controlled by a human is safer because they would have complete control over their own safety, but at the same time humans get into an over one million crashed a
“Google has a fleet of driverless cars since 2009, and they’ve been driven over a half of a million miles without a crash” according to Jamie Page Deaton and Kristen Hall-Geisler in the article ‘Cars of tomorrow-still not fling.’ Humans get into an accident every a half a million miles, this shows that driverless cars are a safer alternative. These cars had a 3D model brain that is accurate to the centimeter because 64 laser beams take about one million measurements per second. They also contain a radar, camera, and GPS. …show more content…
Driverless cars are self-efficient so the “driver” can basically do whatever they would like to do. They can eat, apply makeup, reply to a text message, sleep, read a book for God’s sake all while getting where they need to be. The Cauffer’s price will drop down from $75,000 dollars so it could be adopted by most divers. “By leaving the driving to a whole new slew of computers, sensors, servos, and software, getting fr0m home to office would be rendered accident free.” according to Tony Borroz in the article ‘The pros and cons of a driverless future’.
Driverless cars are very efficient. When more than driverless cars on the road they use their 3D brain to signal the other cars and “will not suddenly stop, so the gaps between can be shorted” said Tony Borroz. “Intelligent roadways will allow the timing of traffic density and speed.” Some may say that cars controlled by a human is safer because they would have complete control over their own safety, but at the same time humans get into an over one million crashed a