Preview

Case Outline: McCann v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Outline: McCann v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
McCann v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Louisiana Eastern District Court
210 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2000)
Fact:
Debra McCann and two of her children (Jillian, and Jonathan) were shopping in Bangor, Maine Wal-Mart on December 11th, 1996. After about an hour and a half, the McCann’s paid for their purchases and proceeded to leave the store. On the way out two Wal-Mart employees (Jean Taylor and Karla Hughes) blocked their path to the exit and stood in front of the McCann’s’ shopping cart. Note Taylor may have actually put her hand on the cart. The employees told McCann that her child had previously stolen from the store and was not allowed in the store. Defendant’s employees told McCann they were calling the police. Defendant did not actually call the police. McCann and her two children were escorted by both Wal-Mart store employees to an area next to the exit place in the store. The plaintiff was told by the defendant to remain in the room until the police officers arrived. The defendant accused him of prior shoplifting. One of the employees was always "watching" the McCann’s and even refused to allow the younger child to go to use the restroom. The call was not made to the police but made to a store security officer to identify the earlier shoplifter. McCann tried to identify herself and clear up the confusion but was unsuccessful. The security officer, Rhonda Bickmore (Bickmore), arrived at the store and explained to the employees that the McCann’s’ son was not the child she caught shoplifting a previous day. The employees understood the mistake made to the plaintiff so they left around 11:15 pm.
Issue:
1. Is the defendant liable for false imprisonment because the employees told the plaintiffs they must remain in the store until the police arrived?
2. Under Maine law did the jury find “actual physical restraint,” when the defendant said the police were on the way?
3. Is Maine’s law even sufficient enough to classify as a reasonable “confinement”?
Decision:
1.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    She was then charged with shoplifting and disorderly conduct. Holguin sued Sally Beauty Supply for false imprisonment, false accusation of shoplifting, and false and malicious abuse of prosecution. The case ended in favor of the defendant, Sally Beauty Supply, in the district court and went to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico. Issue The issue in this case is whether or not Holguin placing the product into her tote back warranted the store to detain her. This depends on whether or not Holguin concealing the product by placing it in the tote and walking towards the front of the store was probably cause to believe she was shoplifting.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statement of facts- Samantha Smith was shopping at a local grocery store in Indiana a few months ago and had an accident. She slipped and fell on some shampoo that had leaked out of one of the bottles. The day Samantha fell, the employee in charge of the aisle inspection was an older gentleman with glasses. The shampoo on the floor was a clear gel. The store alleges that Samantha had a duty to avoid the spill in the aisle. The store claims that she is at much as fault as they are. Further they allege that she was too distracted by her 2 year old son in the cart, who was misbehaving, to notice the floor.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: While shopping at a local grocery store a few months ago, Samantha Smith fell, having slipped on shampoo that was on the floor. Ms. Smith was taken to the hospital where she had to stay overnight and was diagnosed with a broken hip. As a result she will need several months of physical therapy. Ms. Smith has no health insurance and is a single parent to a two year old child. The store claims the aisles are checked at the top of each hour. The day Ms. Smith fell, an elderly gentleman who wears glasses was responsible for the aisle checks. The shampoo on the floor that caused the fall was a gel that is clear in color. The stores logs show that an inspection was performed about 1 pm that day, and Ms. Smith’s fall occurred about 1:30 pm. The store claims Ms. Smith had a duty to avoid the spill but due to being distracted by her son,who0 was misbehaving to do so.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    SAMPLE EXAM 3 2010

    • 3549 Words
    • 16 Pages

    4. Jan was injured in a work-related auto accident. She sued the other driver, and the case went to court. While questioning Jan, the defendant’s lawyer asked if her injuries and lost earnings were covered under workers compensation. Jan’s lawyer objected to the question. The judge ruled that the question was improper and instructed the jury to disregard the question. Based on the judge’s reaction to the question, we can conclude that which of the following rules is in force where this trial took place?…

    • 3549 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Appellant believes the court hindered his ability to provide a defense based on his alibi that he was not present at the scene of the crime when the fire occurred and that he claimed the fire resulted by way of accidentally leaving a hot plate on. The prosecution proved the appellant conspired to ignite the fire later when he was not present. Prosecution also proved that by pouring the accelerant around the hot plate with the power on, is not indicative of an accident. The defense must prove "impossibility of the accused's presence," for which the court found no basis for error in the original trial.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While floor walking in store 603 on 08/22/16 I AP Associate Vanessa McClary observed an unknown male subject that I once recovered merchandise from in store 635 in the pet aisle of store 603, I started watching this subject because I took notice of the fact that he had trash bags on the top of his carriage, which also had merchandise under it. Due to the fact of me not seeing selection I approached the subject and asked him if I could assist him with anything. The subject replied that he didn't need help. I continue to keep an observation on the subject as he went throughout the store putting merchandise from under the trash bag on the shelves. The subject then proceeded o exit the store via the produce side. Total amount recovered $32.63…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On September 28, 2016 the plaintiff who is Blake Joseph a 45 year old IT consultant had stopped off at one out 174 stores of the Green Grocers Ltd located at 2311 Yonge Street. Similarly he went to the store to purchase some grocery. He then continued to go down the fruits and vegetables aisle to continue his search in finding a good head of broccoli. While on his search he failed to notice that there was a squashed tomato on the ground from a customer who had accidentally steppe on it. Moreover the plaintiff then slipped on tomato and fell to the ground he was unable to get up and there were no employees around to assist him. After this incident the plaintiff went to see his family doctor who immediately directed him to the hospital. At the…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In summary, A Orange County 52 year old woman, Connie Barraclough, was arrested in Newport Beach. She exclaimed that the Police Department violated her women’s civil rights. The woman was reportedly booked in a jail where men are processed to be held in jail. Connie was recently drinking earlier that night at an Angels game in Anaheim, the pursuer who arrested Connie reported that she was driving under the influence and arrested her. This all started when Connie realise she was not processed in the correct place for holding. She was actually sent to Orange County Jail in Santa Ana, because of a mishap of not having a female jailer to be “available” to process her. This resulted Connie being held for 12 hours in Orange County Jail rather than Newport Beach Jail which could resulted a…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Can Mr. McPhillen be held liable for assault, battery and false imprisonment when he came to the defense of someone?…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Walmart Retail Theft Case

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While conducting my investigation on theft case #2016-1547, I was notified by Walmart Loss Prevention Officer, Fabiano Estrela, that the male subject, who was with the suspect on 10/11/2016, was currently in the store. Estrela advised me that he positively identified the subject while he was at customer service. I immediately notified Sergeant Koch who arrived on scene within several minutes.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My grandmother asked me to go get some fruit from the food and vegetable section. I was short and asked if one of the store employees to help me reach the bananas and apples. A woman was walking by and wasn’t paying attention to where she was going and hit me with her shopping cart. My grandmother heard all the commotion and ran over to me to see if I was ok. The woman who hit me said that I was running around the aisle and hit her. The store employee told my grandmother that the woman wasn’t telling the truth about the incident. The woman demanded to see the store manager. She told the store manager her version of the event and demanded that my grandmother and I be removed from the store. The store manage then heard my and the employee’s…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Steve often purchases office supplies from Supplymax. a company with stores in many states, but none in Steve home state of Missouri. Supplymax does, however, maintain a distribution center in Kansas City. Missouri. Supplymax does not advertise in Missouri except that it places a few advertisements in national magazines. Some of which are sold in Missouri. Steve has an agreement with their store in Chicago. and Steve will often contact the Chicago store and have them hold items for him to pick up when he is on one of his frequent business trips to Chicago. Last year. Steve purchased eight chairs from Supplymax to use with his Conference table at his business. At a recent meeting with his local sales staff. One of the chairs collapsed injuring Steve. Steve has sued Supplyimax in state court in his hometown of St Louis. Supplymax does not want to have this case heard in Si. Louis. Or anywhere in Missouri for that matter. But if it must be in Missouri. Supplymax demands that the case be heard in Kansas City. Discuss the issues and likely outcome of his situation.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ciara harris

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Is this a civil or criminal case? What is the basis of your answer? (5 pt.)…

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: Matt Theurer was an 18 year old adult that worked at McDonald’s part time. His friends and family worried about him because he had many extra-curricular activities, worked for the National Guard, and worked for McDonalds. McDonald’s informal policy did not allow high school students to work more than one midnight shift per week or split shifts. There was a special clean-up week McDonald’s held, Theurer worked five nights. One night he worked until midnight, another until 11:30pm, two nights until 9pm, and another until 11pm. On Monday, April 4th, 1988, Theurer worked from 3:30 until 7:30pm, followed by the clean up shift beginning at midnight until 5am on April 5th, and then he worked another shift from 5am until 8:21am. During that shift, Theurer told his manager he was tired and asked to leave from his next regular shift. The manager accepted his request, and Theurer began to drive home. He was driving 45 miles per hour on a two lane road when he either fell asleep or became drowsy. Theurer crossed the dividing lane into on-coming traffic, and crashed into Frederic Faverty’s minivan. Theurer was killed and Faverty was seriously injured. Faverty settled his claims with Theurer’s estate, and then he filed suit against McDonald’s.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays