Preview

Castle Doctrine Vs Stand Your Ground Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Castle Doctrine Vs Stand Your Ground Essay
Abstract
Majority of the fifty states have one of two doctrines that articulate the use of physical force when it comes to self-defense and use of deadly force. The first being Castle Doctrine and the second being “stand your ground”. I will explain what these two ideas are and how they are viewed in the bill of some of the states that have adopted them and what are the differences in the two.
Keywords: Castle Doctrine, Stand Your Ground, Deadly Force
Castle Doctrine and stand your ground doctrine refer to the right to defend one’s self under the gun laws of the individual states. Both doctrine have very common ideas but they are different very important ways. What is “castle doctrine” and “stand your ground state”; how do they pertain to the
…show more content…
Typically, deadly force is considered justified homicide only in cases when the actor reasonably feared imminent peril of death or serious bodily harm to oneself or another. The doctrine is not a defined law that can be invoked, but is a set of principles which is incorporated in some form in the law of most states. Forty-six states, including Connecticut, have incorporated the Castle Doctrine into law.” (Connecticut 2012)
An individual under the Castle Doctrine can only use deadly force along with the reasonable fear of a threat, and forcible entry into one’s home. The second condition for justifiable use of force is the highly contested ‘Stand Your Ground”. Nineteen of the fifty states have a form of the “Stand Your Ground Law”. These two doctrines are very similar in many ways except for the lack of the common law of your residences. This difference is defined in the Florida statutes as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A person's right to self defense begins at the moment the person reasonably believes that he or she is facing deadly force and reasonably…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Castle Doctrine is a double edge sword because it gives home owner way to protect their property but we that said in the case of Trayvon Martin who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch should have never happen the kid was not a treat to any property at the time of the murder. I do believe that if someone is in your house and it becomes apparent that they will hurt you and your family you have the right to protect your house but if the person is walking away from your property and away from you it should be illegal to shoot and killed the person. If a person is running away from you it is not self-defense if you shoot someone in the back is not self-defense.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The practical application of the defence power in an age of terrorism is difficult to determine, as it is reliant upon a set of circumstances that can have a plethora of different interpretations from a range of variant perspectives. Unlike some other powers, the defence power is purposive and elastic; it waxes and wanes, and its application “depends upon the facts, and as those facts change so may its actual operation as a power”[1]. Recent developments, such as the Thomas case, have led some theorists to comment that “the elastic of the defence power has become stretched all out of proportion”[2]. In its present interpretation, the defence power is no longer simply fixed on an external aggressor. Instead, the enemy is disguised domestically. It no longer depends upon judicial notice, or requires an expression of proportionality “in a context where the fact of war or piece is important”[3]. However, the reasoning behind this breed of jurisprudence is hard to decipher. The balance between liberty and safety seems to be somewhat askew. In this essay, I will attempt to argue that the defence power is, at least in its present reincarnation, excessively aggressive and at odds with other constitutional guarantors to freedom of speech.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    which makes the use of deadly force constitutional only when a felon threatens the safety of the…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V Garner Essay

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court ruling on the use of deadly force, and would have a significant impact on future cases where non-deadly force was used. Prior to the Garner case being decided, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that Hymon’s actions amounted to a seizure, and his actions were subject to the provisions of the Fourth Amendment that requires all seizures be reasonable. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld this conclusion and ruled that Hymon used excessive force when he “seized” Garner by shooting him. The Court’s ruling held Tennessee’s use of force law as unconstitutional by allowing deadly force to be applied to all fleeing felon incidents, but it was not unconstitutional in that should an officer have probable cause to believe a suspect poses an immediate threat to the officer or others, and set the standard for judging future police use of force…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the article a Castle Doctrine is a theory that gives a homeowner the right to protect his or her home with the use of deadly force. This theory was first started through the common law theory, which wasn’t a written law but an understanding rule. The common law did not vary from state to state but the Castle Doctrine did. Many states have certain requirements of the doctrine which include limitations on where, when, and who can use deadly force. The main requirement that is very important is that you have to be at your own home to use deadly force and be protected under this doctrine. Also, the most important component to this doctrine is to retreat, which means to avoid conflict. Avoiding the conflict such as running away from…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stand your ground laws originated from the general right to self defense, rooted in both natural law and the constitution” (fair). For example the laws on self defense vary from state to state, but in general there allowed to use reasonable physical force to protect there self from imminent or immediate physical injury, you can only use that amount of force that’s necessary to stop the threat of harm. For example, if you get into an arguement with someone and the other person lunges at one or threatens to punch one, they can protect yourself by fighting back. We want less people hurt or…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stand Your Ground Laws

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The "Stand Your Ground" laws are laws that allow people to defend themselves with deadly force, rather than retreating, if they feel they are in danger or a serious felony is about to be committed. This law was present in Zimmerman's trial briefly and that was when he didn't get arrested right away. However, Zimmerman was arrested on April 11, 2012 because the police found evidence that proved that it didn't have anything to do with the "Stand Your Ground" laws. In the court, the lawyers for Zimmerman didn't base their defense on the law, instead since Zimmerman had no option of retreat, so therefore the "Stand Your Ground” didn't apply in the court of law. The Stand Your Ground law was primarily passed in Florida.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concealed Carry

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages

    "The right to defend yourself and your loved ones from criminals is fundamental, That is why it is vital for the people to be able to defend themselves and their loved ones should the need arise." Christopher W Cox and…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Kopel, D. B. (1994). Rational Basis Analysis of "Assault Weapon" Prohibition. Journal of Contemporary Law, 20, 381-417.…

    • 2969 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abolish Stand Your Ground

    • 1178 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United States, stand-your-ground law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place they have lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if they reasonably believe they face an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. Anyone that’s being violated or assaulted against their will and is threatened for their life can use this law. In order to present a case in court one must you have to be able to present a strong case and have evidence to defend yourself. Not all states use or possess this law, but there are a lot that do. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia are all the states that have the law in their state. There are a lot of states that use the law, but Florida has recently had the most problems occur with this law. Between the Trayvon Martin trial and Jordan Davis trial both instances where “stand your ground” took place.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the stand your ground law is used to stop violence its use results in uneccessary deaths therefore O.C.G.A should be revised.the whole u.s was shocked when george zimmerman was founf innocent of killing 17 year old trayvon martin.it was thought of as a easy case for zimmerman since he had no strong opposing testimony.he also used the stand your ground law to prevent jail time.ever since this case there have been continous cases of the law where murderers get away therefore it needing to be revised.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Police Use Of Force Essay

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Petrowski, Thomas states: “Using force to defend against serious assaults is a priority because of the gravity of the encounter; using force to make arrests-where there is no immediate threat to the arresting officer or others- is a significant training concern because this use of force is far more common than using force in defense of life.” Futhermore, Petrowski states: “the dilemma facing use-of-force trainers is how to prepare officers to use reasonable force in both situations-using adequate force without hesitation in defense of life but never using excessive force to make an arrest of a nonthreatening subject and the answer is to train officers to use necessary force in a timely manner when they are about to be assaulted and discourage unnecessary force when seizing an uncooperative, but non-threatening subject.”…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Deadly Force

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law enforcement is allowed to use deadly force only in defense of life, and only as a last ditch effort when no other means are available to protect innocent people and their own lives against imminent, grievous physical injury or death. When an officer even arrives at the scene, there are several factors that may influence the officer to make the decision to use deadly force. Factors such as the type of neighborhood, race, and the behavior of the suspect all play a role in the decision making process to use deadly force.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to research done by Mark Hoekstra, an economist with Texas A&M University who has thoroughly examined “stand your ground” laws, there are a total of about 14,000 homicides taking place annually in the United States (11). A homicide, in this case, refers to one person unlawfully killing another. That is a fairly high number and it didn’t used to be that high. It has risen significantly since “stand your ground” laws have been implemented into 22 states across the United States. These laws give people the right to use deadly force in a situation in which they feel threatened no matter where they are as long as they have a legal right to be there (Mayors 1). These laws were put into place to benefit our society, but it can be proven that they have not been successfully benefitting our society as a whole because while they do give people the peace of mind that they have the right to protect themselves without fearing the consequences they may have before had to face afterwards, they have also resulted in many more deaths that before that could have been avoided if the person sensing danger had first tried to somehow escape the situation they were in before resorting to violence.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics