Preview

Ceo Compensation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ceo Compensation
Should Australian Pay Their CE0s more

1.0 Introduction

High level of CEO pay has urged a strong argument on the pay‐setting process and the outcomes it produces. Statistic shows a dramatic rise in CEOs salaries in Australia over the past 10 years, estimation of annual salary is AU$83,287 –AU$323,051 (Chief Executive Officer Salary, 2012) . The purpose of this report is to determine whether Australian businesses should pay their CEOs more by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages that it could bring to the business and to determine the recommendations that could be applied.

2.0 Analysis

3.1 Advantages

CEO compensation can motivate executives to work harder in maximizing the company profits. Contracts are design to produce optimal incentives, therefore motivates CEO maximize shareholder wealth (Conyon, 2006, p. 28). Successful CEOs demonstrated through superior performance that they are commodities that receive larger pay compensation (Hermalin and Weisbach, 2003). CEO pay is an indicator of how well a company performs and can be considered as a measure to negotiate employee benefits and bonuses (“Why do CEOs make big bucks?”, 2011). An establish pay structures to executive can give a good reputation to the company. Looking at the competitor, American Red Cross has compensation and management development committee to make sure executives compensation is reviewed and approved. Their CEO is paid $500,000 a year, a fair amount considering it’s a non-profit organization. 3.2 Disadvantages Some CEOs are clearly overpaid, it represents self-dealing of a magnitude that has crossed the threshold of what is morally defensible (Harris, 2009, p.4). According to Annet (2006) overpayment may be indicative of a badly functioning company, a shifting product market, scarcity of resources, or corporate governance failure. The average CEO’s total pay package in Australia is now worth almost 100 times that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mr. Zaboschuk

    • 2303 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Canarella, G., & Gasparyan, A. (2008). New insights into executive compensation and firm performance. Managerial Finance, 34(8), 537.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jenn Is the Best

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CEO’o o o s get paid a lot of money, just like many athletes and movie stars. There is no difference between a CEO and athlete and therefore CEO’s should not be singled out for high pay when no one really complains about athlete and movie star salaries.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ira Kay and Steven Van Putten research argues that labor markers for executives are actually competitive, and that pay levels track corporate performance (Kay,Van Putten, 2010). I agree with the notion that executive pay is based on the salaries of others in the industry in a similar position.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cake Consulting

    • 13842 Words
    • 56 Pages

    Simmering, M. J. (2011). Executive Compensation. Retrieved October 4, 2011, from Encyclopedia of Business: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Em-Exp/Executive-Compensation.htm…

    • 13842 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most CEO’s are paid through a “base pay, annual bonuses, long-term incentives, restricted stock awards, and stock options.” (Salary.com, 2011) As a general rule “the base salary accounts for about 20 percent and the other 80 percent is performance-based pay.” (Salary.com) Base pay is usually based upon the core basics and responsibilities of running the company on a day to day basis. Then you have the annual bonuses which are distributed because the executive has met annual performance expectations that were set at the on-set of employment or upon the previous year’s review. Long-term incentive payments are given for performance objectives that have been met over usually a two – to five – year period. Restricted stock awards are given so that the CEO and executives interests are aligned with the share holders; this is because restricted stock awards have an actual cash value. Stock options are used because they are very favorable for the accounting of the company.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current Event Paper

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Martin Olav Slavo has tried to narrow the income gap for years. I would have to say I disagree with the pay. I think it is a little on the high side, but since I’ve never been a CEO, I don’t really know the stress level of the job. One of my favorite Bible verses explains how leaders are supposed to be. "A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach. Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well."(1 Timothy 3:2) This verse really explains how a CEO or a leader of a company should do his job. I agree with the article because CEO’s get paid too much for the little work that they do. God will provide in some form, way, or…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    executive officer (CEO) Compensation: Does CEO power influence the relationship? Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance, 25(4), 709-748.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that it is dissappointing when it comes to how much an executive managers' salary is versus what the average employees' salary is. I get that some people should be paid well if they are the owners of the company or if they are the person that has developed the company but other than that I feel that the executives' pay should be in some what comparison as an average employee. I feel that it is the regular employees are the ones that keep the executives to be paid what they are being paid. I think that the average employees are the ones that do all of the hard work to keep the executives on top. The text states "The social groups contend that the increasein compensation recieved by the U.S. executives are far out of line with those provided to the remainder of the workforce. To substantiate their claim of pay injustice, they note that in the 1990's the CEO's of large companies recieved a 36% raise in compensation, whereas white-collar workers had a 3.9% raise, and blue-collar workers recieved a 2.47% raise. The AFL-CIO stated that a worker making $25,000/year in 1994 would in 1999 be recieving annual pay of $138,350 if his or her pay would have increased at the same rate as that of the average CEO" (Henderson, 2006). This to me is crazy. It is crazy that if the average worker was to actually get that kind of a raise. Could you imagine getting that great of a raise each year? I know I sure could not imagine getting a 36% raise each year. I think that knowing that the executives make a substancial amount of money more than the average worker can sometimes bringe down the morale of the employees. "Those that are defending the compensation of the U.S. executives focus their defenses on the continuous rise in the success and the worth of the U.S. corporations.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is more, in corporations the remuneration is quite high. The highest remuneration is for those, who occupy the most important positions in the company. There is no doubt that…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pummeled by the bind of a painful recession and furious over oversized executive compensation packages at the very Wall Street firms widely blamed for the economic chaos, they gradually distrust key establishments and individual leaders. Americans are angered at the financial services region. They believe that these institutions have rigged the game so that top level executives are rewarded substantially even when they fail. Americans want action to restore fairness to the system and get pay back in line. The variety of experts and activists of political leaders and ordinary citizens, there is a belief that executive incentives have exaggerated short-term perfor¬mance, supported unnecessary risk-taking, and failed to discipline poor performance. Many believe that incentive plans have tempted some CEOs to put personal financial interests in front of good stewardship that provides the long-term interests of their organizations (Ethics Resource Center,…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No, Chief Executive Officers (CEO’s) are not paid what they are worth. Finding data to support this argument was rather difficult. Most of the data available supports the belief that CEO’s are overpaid. Data used to support the statement that CEO’s are paid what they are worth is from companies listed on the Standard and Poor’s 500 (S&P 500). The Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) (2014) website suggests that not all CEOs receive multimillion dollar salaries. CEOs for companies such as Nike, EBay, and Starbucks have million dollar annual salaries, cash compensations, stock, and options (CNN, Money, 2013). These companies are part of the .002 percent that allow people to believe that CEO’s are overpaid.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An article from the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology documents a SIOP conference panel discussion . SIOP member, Brian O’Leary asks “Why are CEOs being rewarded at a level that doesn’t seem to be commensurate to their contributions to the organization, especially in cases where they are running failing organizations?”. Edwin Locke, the Dean’s professor of Leadership and Business at the University of Maryland argues that “Some people think there is an intrinsic amount of pay that is correct for a job. The problem is, there’s no such thing” (Schings). He goes on to say “I would not say executives with high pay are overpaid just because they are paid…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A proper pay ratio is one that is fair. I cannot accurately put a number to a proper pay ratio, but a CEO should understand that of the entire company is making money, then he makes money too. A person making a minimum wage can afford the bare necessities, and a slight bump can help the employee afford more, inadvertently helping the economy. A CEO making 25 times that of the employee would only use that bump for indulgences.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    High CEO Pay

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this essay, I will attempt to reason why in my understanding high CEO pay are unjustified given the rising economic inequality. I will use references from many different philosophical papers concordant to my interpretation of the pivotal concepts depicted in them to support my statements. Before I set out to argue why high executive compensations are not justified given the rising economic inequality, the first part of this essay will explore why I believe the current level of CEO compensations are excessive and unjust in itself and in the second part of the essay I will try to show the implications of higher CEO pay and its role in increasing the economic inequality which makes it unjustified.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These remarks paint a completely different picture than what is listed on the corporate career web page. In my paper, my focus will be on the challenging monetary compensation of the company and to offer strategies on how to…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays