Preview

Chapter Summary Of Opening Skinner's Box

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
636 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter Summary Of Opening Skinner's Box
Matt Noah
Summer Assignment
AP Psychology
30 August 2017
Book Review
Opening Skinner’s Box: Summary: This book consists of ten chapters each with its own short story, each of which containing an experiment. In the first chapter author Lauren Slater talks about the work done by psychologist B.F. Skinner, mainly about his experimentation and the controversy over his methods. He believed positive reinforcement worked better in establishing behavior than negative reinforcement. Chapter 2 talks about Stanley Milgram and describes Milgram's obedience to authority experiment, shocks were simulated to see if the subject would be obedient. The results of the experiment showed that 65% of people would obey the orders of a credible authority, even if it was to the extent hurting another human. The next story
…show more content…
Chapter four, Lauren Slater talks about a crime that happened in New York in 1964, where a woman was stabbed and raped by man. This happened during the day where there were witnesses, however, no one took any actions stop the crime. Results from studies showed when other people were around the subject was less likely to intervene. In this chapter five, Lauren Slater talks about Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the phenomenon in which an individual adjusts his/her beliefs to better fit or justify one's behavior. Next, the experiments performed by Harry Harlow on monkeys to determine what the basis for love was. He separated new born monkeys from their mothers and found the baby monkeys preferred the soft surrogate mothers who could not feed them over the metal surrogates that could provide food. Based on these results, Harlow concluded that touch was the basis of forming love. Chapter seven talks about a psychologist, Bruce Alexander, and his research and experiments regarding addiction to narcotics. In experiments on rats, Alexander argued that the rodents

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of the chapter "Opening Skinner's Box," Lauren Slater acknowledges B.F. Skinner's remarkable ability to conduct experiements with animals, and had many great successes with them. However, Slater would remind us in her own opinion that he had used his baby daughter was an experiment too. Skinner's plan with his daughter was to "shape" her behavior, as he demanded from the rest of his experimentations. Furthermore, Slater continuously questions Skinner's motives for everything, from changing his career to examinating his daughter in a box. Slater eventually had decided to verify this by calling for Skinner's other daughter, Julie Vargas.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After finishing the book “Opening Skinner’s Box” by Lauren Slater the Chapter on Eric Kandel’s sea slug experiment is what I found very interesting. Eric Kandel is a psychoanalysis and neurologist who did an experiment using Aplysia slugs. In this experiment he trained his sea slugs by touching their bodies and siphons with an electric probe. This caused the sea slugs gill to withdrew. This experiment caused Kandel to discover with his colleagues that the sea slugs reflex could possibly be form by three different forms of learning, such as: habituation, sensitization, and classical conditioning.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A classic experiment on the natural obedience of individuals was designed and tested by a Yale psychologist, Stanley Milgram. The test forced participants to either go against their morals or violate authority. For the experiment, two people would come into the lab after being told they were testing memory loss, though only one of them was actually being tested. The unaware individual, called the “teacher” would sit in a separate room, administering memory related questions. If the individual in the other room, the “learner,” gave a wrong answer, the teacher would administer a shock in a series of increasingly painful shocks correlating with the more answers given incorrectly. Milgram set up a recorder that played back screams that matched the different shock levels. Being tested was the teacher’s obedience in administering the pain, going against his/her personal morals. Though this test yielded fascinating results, the use of humans in potentially traumatizing experiments for research is very controversial. Milgram’s findings and beliefs are expressed in his paper, “The Perils of Obedience.” Milgram argues that people are far too obedient to authority without justified reason. According to this view, people follow orders far too easily because they are trained to obey. On the other hand, Diana Baumrind, in her response “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience argues that Milgram’s results were poorly tested and are therefore inaccurate. In her words, “The laboratory is not the place to study degree of obedience or suggestibility…since the bar line for these phenomena as found in the laboratory is probably much higher than in most of settings” (WRAC 227). Three issues that emerge in both articles that are important to understanding the controversy are consent, dangers, validity.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article named ‘’Review of Stanley Milgramss Experiments on Obedience’’ by Diana Baumrind looks at Milgrams experiment of learning, and then discusses whether Milgram violated the rights of his subjects, or did a beneficial experiment for humanity.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Milgram study was based off Stanley Milgram’s curiosity about the issues of obedience. Milgram wanted to investigate the question is Germans were particularly susceptible to showing obedience to authority figures since that was the excuse for so many Nazi’s during World War 2. The experiment used one subject, “the learner” as an actor to see how far the other participant, “the teacher”, would obey to authority. The task included “the teacher” asking “the learner”, who was strapped to an electric chair, a series of questions. If “the leaner” answered any of these questions wrong, Milgram would order “the teacher” to administer electric shocks to the participant hooked up to the electric shock generator.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment consisted of four standardised prompts, if they were unsuccessful then another two random prompts were added until the participant ended the experiment (Gibson, 2011). According to Holloway (2005), Milgram’s (1974) research attempted to theorise destructive obedience that revolved around the concept of a power related dualism of agency structure and the concept of an agentic state. Suggesting that obedience relied upon an individual entering a psychological state in which a loss of a sense of autonomy as a social being with their actions being controlled by some other agent (Reicher & Haslam, 2012). Conversely, experiments on deception in authoritative contexts conducted by Nissani (1990), argues that the human cognitive system has limitations, therefore individuals could not be relied upon to understand that an apparently benevolent authority is actually malevolent. Consequently, the fundamental reason for the participants behaviour could be conceptual and not the supposed capacity and abandonment of morals of an individual. Russell (2009) suggests that a state of autonomous denial should supersede Milgram’s (1974) concept of…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiments had a great impact on the modern experiment that was performed by Mermillod, Marchand, Lepage, Bague, and Danbrun in (2015). Also, Mermillod, Marchand, Lepage, Bague, and Danbrun (2015) talk about a discussion that regards the social significance of Milgram’s experiments, they also mentioned that recent research shows that destructive obedience is more meaningful and important (Mermillod, Marchand, Lepage, Bague, and Danbrun 2015). They also talked about the takeover viewpoint of how individuals are obedient due to positive conformity to the authority’s commands, recent research demonstrated that individuals to be obedient based on an identification with the experimenter and the purpose of the experiment (Mermillod et al., 2015). Milgram’s pervious experiment was also used by Mermillod et al., (2015) in the study they…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1960’s, psychologist Stanley Milgram set out to study why people typically responded in obedience to authority figures. He had been fascinated by the Holocaust, and why so many people participated in this tragic historical event. On other occasions, he had also observed that it was difficult for individuals to deny an authority figure’s instruction, even if that instruction goes against one’s morals. Milgram believed that if he could vary the factors that were normally associated with obedience, and relate this to specific commands, than the tricky topic of obedience could be easily studied. This technique would allow him to manipulate key variables throughout the experiment, such as where the command came from, how it was executed,…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is the nature of obedience? A question that two leading scientists of the 1960’s tried to answer. At the heart of the cycle of enquiry stands Stanley Milgram with his initial experiment on obedience performed in 1963. The research results were so notorious that it determined scientists like Charles Hofling to replicate the study, and in 1966, he completed a conceptual replication of Milgram’s experiment. First we will look at how the two studies explore a similar topic using a different design and experimental condition, and second, we will explore some of the similarities between their results and ethical aspects.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason so many people obey instructions when they feel compelled remains challenging and difficult to understand in social psychology. However, social psychologist Stanley Milgram investigated the impact of authority figure on obedience in an experiment perhaps known as the best-known study in social psychology (Fiske, 2008). Also, the motivation for Stanley to conduct this experiment is to understand why individuals will engage in horrific acts that put others in imminent danger that can lead to severe harm. However, Stanley (1963) concluded that obedience to authority persist due to fear or a desire to appear in compliant with directives even when this is against their opinion or judgement.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Under certain circumstances ordinary individuals, with no prior sadistic or violent history, can be pressured and convinced into harming others. These circumstances arise when the individuals committing the harmful acts are forced into believing that they are not going to be held accountable for any of the acts committed. Milgram’s experiment on Obedience and Conformity demonstrates this idea. Milgram’s experiment involved a researcher dressed in a lab coat, who instructed a subject referred to as the teacher to teach a pair of words to the subject known as the learner. Under instructions given by the researcher, the teacher was to administer an electric shock to the learner, whenever the answer he/ she gave was inaccurate. The severities of the shocks administered were to increase with each wrong answer given by the learner. Milgram found that majority of the participants administered the highest level of the shock, despite the agonizing pleas and…

    • 1284 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harlow’s Theory: Love

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Harry F. Harlow, “Love in Infant Monkeys,” Scientific American 200 (June 1959):68, 70, 72-73, 74…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays