Krakauer in the start of the book depicts Chris as insightful and mindful, “In May 1990, Chris graduated from Emory University in Atlanta, where he’d been a columnist, and editor of, the student newspaper, The Emory Wheel, and had distinguished himself as a history and anthropology major with a 3.72 grade- point average.”(Krakauer 20). With this incorporated into the book it passes on that Chris is exceptionally shrewd and can stand his ground. He additionally shows Chris' certainty when he includes, “No thanks anyway, I’ll be fine with what I’ve got.” (Krakauer 6). In the meantime he clarifies how he is woefully ill-equipped to live in the wild and how he is somewhat…
Despite the fact that Chris has admirers, he additionally has faultfinders. According to numerous, he was a man who was "lost" in each…
Chris was a very kind man. He did not be mean to anyone and he was really selfless. He cared about others in ways ive never seen before. He wouldnt take advantage of other people. Even when he could be wealthy and have a good career he gave that up and gave all the money he had to chairty. He took care of many people through his journey even throughout all his anger and hate towards his parents, he was still kind to other poeple.…
Christopher McCandless or Alexander Supertramp should be admired for his courage and noble idea to drop everything and go into the wild, with nothing but a backpack and in it was a book of Tolstoy, a book about native plants and berries, a .22 rifle with 400 rounds of ammunition, a writing implement, a journal, a camera, a 10 pound bag of rice, a small cooking utensil, matches, a knife, and some fishing twine and a hook, and the few clothes he had on his back. Chris was trying to find himself by leaving everything behind, yes Chris might have been a little reckless but you have to be a little reckless to go into the wild and hitchhike around the world. This quote support that's chris was just living and trying to find himself was, “...McCandless pitched his tent in the puny shade of a tamarick and basked in his newfound freedom. (Krakauer 27)” this is saying that McCandless was happy to finally be by himself and start life in the wild,…
I agree with the author that Chris McCandless wasn’t a crazy person and he was seeking happiness for himself in the wild. There are many things that show that he wasn’t crazy, like getting along with people, having some knowledge of living in the wild, and he was very bright and made some good decisions. However, he did seem somewhat incompetent.…
been a part of society. Chris was the type of person who did not like how greedy and…
Also many people argued that McCandless was suffering from a mental illness probably like depression, however, there has been no evidence given that Chris was actually suffering from this. A third thing is that there is no doubt that Chris McCandless did not have a bound with his parents, he did not spend a lot of time with them, but have people considered the fact that Chris did not want to become like his parents, the type that have to work all the time and the type that do not have time to do anything else but…
Graduating from not only high school but also college would also back the fact that he is somewhat smart. But no matter how book smart you are does not allow you to go into the Alaskan wilderness and survive like it’s a piece of cake. This is where Chris’s arrogance shows because he believes he can go into the wild and survive off of minimal knowledge of the land and in survival alone. His arrogance and lack in knowledge definitely shows in the overall outcome of his fate because in the end Chris dies of starvation which could have been avoided with proper training and…
Chris McCandless longed for independence and freedom from the life he was living and embarks on the adventure of a lifetime. Jon Krakauer, the author of Into the Wild, begins the book by giving the reader a narration of his journey ,then shortly after changes into a mystery by telling the reader of a dead body found in the bus. The readers can infer that the body found is Chris, giving the reader a feeling that he was crazy for making this venture into the wild and doubt his mental state. Krakauer, then tells the reader of Everett Ruess, a young man who did the same journey and died, giving the reader his view on Chris that he didn’t go out into the wild, because he was crazy but it was more for his own good as a person. The author would continue…
Chris did what was expected of him and went to college. During his time in college Chris was haunted by his parent's past, caused him to lose his identity. Everything he knew became false. He no longer…
Throughout the tragic novel Into the Wild, author Jon Krakauer provides an in depth analysis of the life and lonely death of Christopher McCandless. McCandless was a young man straight out of college, looking to find himself while hitchhiking alone in the bush of Alaska. Unfortunately for Chris his well anticipated venture turned fatal after a hundred some days alone in the wilderness. Jon Krakauer uses rhetorical methods for the duration of the book, which allows him to speak of Chris’s life with a sense of certainty. The reader thus trusts Krakauer’s narrative and somewhat understands why a man like Chris could head into unknown territory without a second thought. The author shows his qualification for writing about Chris by making comparisons with his own life and interviewing those close to Chris…
I agree with the main point that Shaun Callarman states, "Chris McCandless was ignorant, but bright at the same time", by leaving his family and his education, he committed himself towards a life of solitude and emptiness. McCandless was not only ignorant, but he was arrogant about changing his lifestyle, he even had the nerve to leave his family behind without any notification about his departure. By leaving his family and his education, McCandless had committed himself towards a life of solitude and emptiness. McCandless was not only ignorant and careless, but he was arrogant about changing his lifestyle, he even had the nerve to leave his family behind without any notification about his departure. For a boy that was an intelligent High School graduate who was going to succeed in life, McCandless had made one of the most idiotic decisions ever, and that was leaving his success and family behind to die in the wild by a potato plant.…
“S.O.S I NEED YOUR HELP. I AM INJURED, NEAR DEATH, AND TOO WEAK TO HIKE OUT OF HERE. I AM ALL ALONE, THIS IS NO JOKE. IN THE NAME OF GOD, PLEASE REMAIN TO SAVE ME. I AM OUT COLLECTING BERRIES CLOSE BY AND SHALL RETURN THIS EVENING. THANK YOU, CHRIS MCCANDLESS. AUGUST?” The novel Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer is about a young man named Chris McCandless. This individual, right after college had left in the pursuit of adventure and into the wilderness. He left without telling anyone, family and friends alike of his whereabouts and with small portions and little provisions. For this particular reason, some see McCandless as a misguided wacko who caused his own demise, while on the other hand some see him as noble, just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Chris McCandless is indeed noble! He possessed courage and ideals which I admired. He was noble for his self-reliance, being intellectual, and that he was not materialistic.…
In the public's eyes Chris McCandless may seem like he went crazy or insane, and they may be right. But he went out and followed his dreams, went against societal norms, and experienced things that most people will never get the chance to. People can say a lot of different…
“So many people live within unhappy circumstances and yet will not take the initiative to change their situation…” (Krakauer 56). Throughout Jon Krakauer’s book, Into the Wild, Chris McCandless sees this as a truth so many are unwilling to face. However he refuses to be one of those people who are, “conditioned to a life of security, conformity, and conservation” (Krakauer 57) regardless of his own highly comfortable upbringing. Throughout the book, Krakauer develops his thesis that Chris is not just another Bear Grylls wanna-be. In this respect the author is correct. He isn’t just someone who read a book or article and decided to run to the Alaska wilderness. “He wasn’t incompetent—he wouldn’t have lasted 113 days if he were.”(Krakauer 85).…