It does not matter if it was or was not because he was a model of a Roman citizen and demonstrated important characteristics to the Romans. The legacy was especially important because: it “served a useful purpose by rallying the citizens of the fledgling Republic together as one, demonstrating that a loyal citizen must place the matters of the state over his own self-interest.” The so-called myth taught a lesson to the Romans explaining that to be a loyal citizen you need to things for the state and not just yourself. It brought Rome together. Even “Cicero, who wrote of the dictator’s recall in 439 BCE, raised some doubt to the supposed legendary exploits” Writers also questioned the legend that they had written. Although people to this day still wonder if the story is true, it does not matter. It was purposeful and special and even if it was definitely valid it would still serve the same
It does not matter if it was or was not because he was a model of a Roman citizen and demonstrated important characteristics to the Romans. The legacy was especially important because: it “served a useful purpose by rallying the citizens of the fledgling Republic together as one, demonstrating that a loyal citizen must place the matters of the state over his own self-interest.” The so-called myth taught a lesson to the Romans explaining that to be a loyal citizen you need to things for the state and not just yourself. It brought Rome together. Even “Cicero, who wrote of the dictator’s recall in 439 BCE, raised some doubt to the supposed legendary exploits” Writers also questioned the legend that they had written. Although people to this day still wonder if the story is true, it does not matter. It was purposeful and special and even if it was definitely valid it would still serve the same