Preview

Civil Rights

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Rights
Anna Jardot
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Writing Assignment

Affirmative action is the practice of improving educational and job opportunities of groups of people who have been treated unfairly in the past due to their race, sex, etc. In the US the effort was to improve the educational and employment opportunities of women and men of minority. Following the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, affirmative action was designed to counteract the lingering effects of generations of past discrimination.
I am not sure what I think about whether or not Affirmative Action should be abolished. I do believe that we should be doing more to try and improve discrimination. If we didn’t do anything to try and improve discrimination among the educational and job opportunities this world would be run by hateful people. I can understand where people would believe that it is racist towards whites. I don’t believe any type of racism should happen. Affirmative Action is for all minorities, not just for blacks, Hispanics, etc. This includes whites as well.
On the other hand I can also see the flip side of this. Would I really want to work for a place that only hired me because they had to? Should companies have to hire people of a certain race to meet quotas? I believe that companies should hire people of all races as we live in a country of equal opportunity. I found some cases of Affirmative Action. I found them interesting.
Fisher v University of Texas This is a case which concerns the affirmative action of an admissions policy of a Texas University. The Supreme Court voided the lower appellates court ruling in favor of the University. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fifth Circuit court of appeals has to reconsider the case. The University considers race as one of their factors for admission.

Schuette v Coalition This case is about a University in Michigan that banned racial preferences in the admissions process. This case is still under review I believe. From what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Auto Workers V. Johnson Controls, the Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against Johnson Control in federal district courts over illegal sex discrimination under Title VII. The district court entered a summary judgment for Johnson Controls. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, leading the plaintiff to then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. J. Blackmun delivered the opinion of the court in which Marshall, Stevens, O’Connor, and Souter joined. J. White filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment, in which Rehnquist and Kennedy joined. J. Scalia filed an opinion concurring in judgment. Case was decided in March 20, 1991.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi Vs Rumsfeld Summary

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Cyr, which questioned the district court?s jurisdiction under the general habeas corpus statute when dealing with illegal immigration and anti-terrorist groups. Zadvydas v. Davis, asking whether the Attorney General has the authority to arrest a removable alien after the removal period or not. Matthews vs Eldridge, dealing with an inevidentary hearing to a disabilities beneficiary being terminated violating the Due Process of the Fifth Amendment (Cornell Law, 2004).…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A. University of California Regents vs. Bakke (1978) wanted to go to grad school at uc davis-cali regents didn't have minorities and made a goal to have more diverse student body-uc davis set aside 15/100 for minorities-Alen Bakke files suit uses 14th amendment EP clause-Supreme court ruled in favor of Bakke-said you can't have quota for minorities-can consider race for one part of admission but not the only reason…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hence, in 1963, the case was repealed by Lovings stating that the judgment was in violation of the fourteenth amendment, but the state trail and the courts denied it signifying that the statues were constitutional. The state failing in their efforts the case was brought to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Warren proceeding over the case re-opened in 1967 gave the final verdict that previous sentencing by the state was in violation of principal of equality. Then ordered that under the constitution the freedom to marry or not another person of a different race was an individual choice and was not for the states to decide. Accordingly, the limitation on admitting racial minorities placed by the Brown University a state funded university was also in violation of equal protection clause, which paved the way for Affirmative action in 1961 that requires equal access to education for underrepresented factions, such as women and…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adarand V

    • 701 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issue is an affirmative action case that make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The court was being asked to decide whether categorizing citizens by race in order to determine the kind of treatment those individuals would receive was constitutional or not. This is not something new to be tried within the United States Supreme Court system. Attorneys for each side of the Adarand v. Pena case presented to the court, but ultimately the court would make no decision on it, in the end.…

    • 701 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abigail Fisher filed law suit against the University of Texas in 2008 after the school denied her admission because of the color of her skin. Fisher filed suit against the university and other related defendant claiming that the University of Texas use of race as a consideration in admission decision was in violated of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI. The courts decide in favor of the University of Texas and the United State court of appeal for the fifth circuit affirmed the district court decision. Fisher appeals the appellate court decision. In these cases, affirmative action will argue that such program are based on reverse-racism. In American society, racism is still a potent force. It made not be violent like it was 50 year ago, but it stills an issue today. In the case of Fisher versus the University of Texas on the ground that their affirmative action based admissions process is unconstitutional. The current admission policy automatically admits the top ten percent from each Texas High School. Base on affirmative action, they operate on the basis of race it has to make this assumption. To compare Abigail case to other case that are similar to her is that Bakke, Grutter, and Gratz all had the same situation of applying for a school. All of them was denied admission because the use of race as a factor in making admission decision. These cases were affected by the Equal Protection Clause of Title VI. Some of these cases were…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    US Legal (2015). The Daubert Decision and the Supreme Court’s Construction of Rule 702. Retrieved from…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Howes, Warden vs. Fields is a recent Supreme Court case that was argued in October 2011 and a decision was made in February 2012. Randall Lee…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 913 Words
    • 1 Page

    and everything in between, as long as humanity stands up and takes action against what it…

    • 913 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil rights

    • 1023 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who was the most significant member if the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King or Malcolm X ?…

    • 1023 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legislature of the fictitious state of Xanadu passes a law that states "All people are welcome at all state-run swimming, beach and golf facilities, as long as they are white. Non-whites may not use any of those facilities."…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the 1800's, racism had been prevalent America, but by the mid 1900's African Americans and some caucasians were both looking for reform. In the south there were peaceful protests such as the Montgomery bus riot and nonviolent civil rights organizations, but in other places there were violent groups and protests. Both groups wanted civil rights, but there viewpoints were much different. One group wanted integration and the other wanted two completely separate areas for African Americans and caucasions.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Seperate but Equal

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In different states over the United States similar cases have been going about. Each of these cases has to do with black students obtaining entry into public schools of their community. Linda Brown was a student that lived a few blocks from a public school but was still denied because of her skin color. This segregation was apparent to deprive the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws under the 14th amendment. In spite of other cases, a three judge federal district court rejected relief to the plaintiffs on the separate but equal doctrine announced by the court in Plessy vs Fergson. That doctrine accorded equality of treatment when the races are provided noticeable equal facilities, even though these facilities are separate. The Supreme Court of Delaware obeyed to the doctrine but ordered that the plaintiffs be accepted to the Caucasian schools.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Majority opinions are decided by more than half the justices and are used to set case precedent. Dissenting opinions disagree with the majority of decisions made by the court and do not set case precedent. However, this type of opinion may be cited in an attempt to overturn laws. Concurring opinions happen when one or more judges agree with the majority of the other judges for varying reasons. These types of decisions cannot be cited; nor do they establish case precedent. The Supreme Court’s decision in this case has set case precedent on how employee discrimination lawsuits are initiated and further outlined the requirements of having substantial evidence instead of circumstantial statistical evidence for employment…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nonviolent civil disobedience was a successful tactic for advancing the civil rights movement. In the South of the United States during the 1950s, black people had little legal rights. They were the victims of systematic, degrading discrimination and they could do nothing to get recourse. Unfortunately, most whites stuck to the traditional ways of segregation and discrimination because they believed that any relaxation of the discriminatory social code would lead to violence by blacks against whites. White people were afraid of free black people causing a myriad sorts of mayhem, thus the whites sought a society and future of controlling the blacks.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays