Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Civil War Compromises

Good Essays
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Compromises
Compromise helped delay the Civil War by maintaining the balance of both slave and free states, discontinuing the slave trade in Washington D.C. and returning slaves to their original owners with the Fugitive Slave Act, The Missouri Compromise of 1820 maintained the balance of slave and free states for 30 years. This kept the North and south satisfied. Missouri was added as a slave state and to sustain the equality between both sides, Maine was carved out of Massachusetts and added as a free state. The compromise also drew in the latitude line of 36° 30’, which permitted all states north of that line to be free (except for Missouri) and all states south of it to be slave states. This line also maintained the states that would allow slaves in the western territories. This compromise clearly delayed the war for 30 years, keeping both sides relatively content. The north was satisfied with the discontinuation of the selling of slaves in Washington D.C. They were aware that abolishing slavery was not going to be simple but they put in effort to prevent the spread of slavery to the west. The south strongly desired the spread of slavery to new territories. However, they were kept satisfied with the Fugitive Slave Act, which was being more strictly enforced. This act made it so that slaves that had escaped using the Underground Railroad would be returned to their owners, as long as the owners had proof or evidence of ownership. Anyone assisting the escape of a slave would be charged with a $1,000 fine and up to six months in jail. The results of this compromise were that California entered the Union as a free state, and Utah would be allowed to enter the Union as a slave state if citizens voted by means of popular sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act is when a lot of the contentment on both sides began to fall apart. Senator Stephen A. Douglas, responsible for passing the Compromise of 1850, wanted a railroad running west through Chicago. The problem with that were the unsettled territories in the west. He organized these territories into Kansas and Nebraska. Under the provisions of the Compromise of 1850, these territories would be added as free states. This tilted the balance of the free and slave states and gave the north an unfair advantage. Senator Douglas chose to get rid of the Missouri Compromise and go about the issue of slavery by use of popular sovereignty as well. Residents of Kansas voted strongly for it to be a slave state and what ensued was an upheaval and a violent attack by the antislavery residents, led by John Brown. This is when the Civil War was becoming unavoidable and there were no more compromises that could delay it.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6. The Compromise of 1850 called for California to enter the Union as a free state, had the people in New Mexico and Utah decide if they wanted slavery in their state, had the slave trade abolished in Washington D.C., and passed the Fugitive Slave Act.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, there were some major Civil War laws of the Western Expansion, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort to conserve a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states, by the U.S Senate and the House of Reps. The slaveholding states feared of being outnumbered in the Congressional Representation. They feared because they would lack the power to protect their interest in property and trade. After much debate the law passed the Senate on March 2nd, 1820 and passed the House of Reps on February 26th, 1821.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    The compromise of 1850 was a document constructed by Henry Clay to ease tensions between North and South. The compromise consisted of the following five points—(1) writing a new fugitive slave law, since beforehand white citizens could give runaway slaves room and board and not be penalized, therefore appeasing the South, (2) annexing California as a free state to the Union, an advantage to the North, (3) prohibiting the slave trade, but not slavery itself, in the District of Columbia, (4) reorganizing the Mexican Cession into the New Mexico and Utah territories with the slavery issue being decided by popular sovereignty, and (5) declaring a border between Texas and New Mexico, with $10 million in reparations for the territory Texas surrendered…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise created a temporary balance of slave v. free states until the Kansas-Nebraska Act. It decreased the arguing in senate about which states would be free or slave. But in the long term, we can argue that the Missouri Compromise created the clear barrier between north and south that would not come together until the end of the Civil War and was a prime reason for the Civil…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    slave state, while also adding Maine to the nation as a free state to maintain balance. However, this compromise also states that any state north of the Mason-Dixon line, “contemplated by this act, slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, and is hereby, forever prohibited.” It effectively divided the country by geography, and it indirectly splits people into a demographic.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely because of its contents, but rather because it caused people to voice their angered opinions about slavery, unavoidably causing the government to realize the importance of finding a genuine solution to the reality of slavery if the future of America was to survive and truly be united.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, a political action made during this period of time was the events of the Compromise of 1850. This question of westward expansion was thought at first to solve the question of slavery in territories. California was admitted as a free state and New Mexico and Utah were both organized as territories without slavery but the decision to decide if they chose to enter the states. These compromises were exhausted attempts for the free states to compromise slavery.…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For nearly 30 years, the compromise worked, with two states being admitted together, one slave, one free. Then, in 1850, California was admitted as a stand-alone free state, upsetting the balance 16–15, in exchange for a Congressional guarantee no restrictions on slavery would be placed on the territories of Utah or New Mexico and passage of the Fugitive Slave Act, which required citizens of all states to return any runaway slaves to their masters. In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in territories, as part of the decision in the Dred Scott case. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 repealed the 36-30 dividing line for slavery in the Louisiana Purchase area.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over slavery arose again after the Mexican-American War, when Congress had to decide the status of new territory acquired from Mexico. Although the Constitution gave Congress no ability to rid the nation of slavery, it allowed for Congress to determine the qualification future state's admission. This made it possible for a majority of either section to manipulate a new state's status through making the abolition or the protection of slavery necessary for the state to become organized. An earlier compromise in 1820, was the result of a struggle for sectional control over the status of Missouri. Congress choose to appease both sides by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The compromise created a westward line dividing the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    us history module 1

    • 2463 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Compromise of 1850 – a series of congressional measures that allowed California to become a state, settled border disputes between Texas and New Mexico, and created the Fugitive Slave Act…

    • 2463 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was an agreement made that allowed for Missouri to join the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state to ensure the equal representation. A line is drawn across the map which it excludes slavery from any point north of parallel 36:30 below that line, would be able to come in a slave state and above the line would become free states. This compromise was a solution that would postpone the civil…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the Mexican War, America was given western territories. The problem with the new territories was debating over which states would be free and which would be slave. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. When people are allowed to vote on the way they are governed, it is known as popular sovereignty. Of course many states grew angry because some of them wished to be either a free state when they were already a slave state or vice versa, which caused more…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As part of the compromise of 1850, the Fugitive slave act was passed (The North to return runaway slaves to the south); in response the north established personal freedom laws. Essentially the North gets more from the compromise of 1850, and by not complying with the Fugitive slave law made it even more of a Northern victory. Northerners saw laws that endorse slavery as contrary to Gods law and therefore invalid, this unfairness in the Union caused a split to occur, a split that may not be mended. The election of a new president would finish the split between the North and South and lead to a…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery state representatives. The compromise involved the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state boundaries of the Missouri territory. In return for Missouri being a freed state, Maine was allowed to become a state separate from Massachusetts. The Events that led up to the compromise are not nearly as important as what the compromise represented; a deep rooted division of doctrine.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The South did not find a problem in slavery because the slaves saved the south a lot of labor and money. The Missouri Compromise was a big step in our countries process in outlawing slavery. Many southern…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays