Preview

Civil War Political Causes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Political Causes
There were many economic and political causes of the Civil War in the terms of conflict over economic policy and the expansion of slavery into the territories. Many documents, people, and events in history help to causes of the Civil War such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Missouri Compromise, Texas annexation, Wilmot Proviso, Compromise of 1850, Gadsden Purchase, the creation of the Republican Party, and the Dred Scott decision. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1854. The act allowed people in the territories(states) of Kansas and Nebraska to have the right to decide for themselves whether or not they would allow slaves within their borders. The purpose of the act was to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which wouldn’t …show more content…
In March 1854, anti-slavery Whigs stared to begin meetings in the upper mid-western states to discuss the formation of a new party. The party they came up with was the Republican party in 1857. In addition, United States Supreme Court issues a decision in the Dred Scott case, giving the right of slave owners to take their slaves into Western territories, this would be negating the doctrine of popular sovereignty and greatly undermining the platform of the newly created Republican Party. Aside from that, the Texas annexation was the 1845 incorporation of the Republic of Texas as the 28th state in the United States of America, which was accepted in the Union as the 28th state on December 29, 1845. The Compromise of 1850 was made up of five laws that were passed in September of 1850. The laws dealt with the issue of slavery in America. The Gadsden Purchase is a 30,000-square-mile region of current southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico. This region of land the United States bought in a treaty that was signed on December 30, 1853, by James …show more content…
At the time the large majority of the Texas population favored the annexation of the Republic by the United States. The leadership of both major U.S. political parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, were against the introduction of Texas, because it was a huge slave-holding region. They didn’t see it as the best fit at the time because of the pro and antislavery disagreement. But they also wanted to avoid war with Mexico. The Republic Texas eventually became part of the United States. As events turned out over the next 15 years, the nation found out that they could no longer resolve the issues in the name by political means. The result of was the huge American Civil War. All of the slavery questions were settled but at a cost of 620,000 American lives. The Wilmot Proviso proposed an American law that banned slavery in territory acquired from Mexico in the Mexican War. This created major conflict in the nation. The conflict over the Wilmot proviso was one of the main events that impacted the American Civil War. The Wilmot Proviso passed the House of Representatives but failed in the Senate, where the South had larger representation. Wilmot spent multiple years of his life fighting for his plan. He offered it as an add on existing bills, and introduced it to Congress all by himself and he even tried to attach it to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. All of his attempts

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    F. Wilmot Proviso- one of the major events leading to the American Civil War, would have banned slavery in any territory to be acquired from Mexico in the Mexican War or in the future, including the area later known as the Mexican Cession, but which some proponents construed to also include the disputed lands in south Texas and New Mexico east of the Rio…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Near the end of the Mexican-American War, the question of whether new territories won in the war would allow slavery or not became an issue. To address this issue, Pennsylvania Congressman David Wilmot proposed the”Wilmot Proviso” (Proviso = condition of terms of agreement), which called for the banning of slavery from any land purchased from Mexico. Northerners supported the proviso, southerners hated It., and after much debate, it was voted down, but reopened the debate about slavery and exposed serious sectional divisions in the…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Wilmot Proviso-unsuccessful 1846 congressional amendment that sought to ban slavery in territories newly acquired from Mexico…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas would opt to join the Union once again. This time the year was 1845, and the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the war with Mexico, the North and South were having some issues with slavery and the more or less under control of slavery. With the Missouri Compromise they had settled which areas would have slavery and which they would not. And of course, there was still tensions between the North and South about slavery. With the war with Mexico the change with what to make of slavery was making tensions the were much more intense. The war with Mexico led to the taking of huge amounts of land, by the saying that the US had decided that the status of slavery in the new territories that was Mexico’s land.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Wilmot Proviso was an amendment proposed, by democrat David Wilmot, to the bill for peace with Mexico in 1846. The amendment stated that all land attained in the treaty with Mexico would be slave free. This proposed amendment would be a debated for years and set out a pressing issue dealing with westward expansion. Southerners thought it was unfair because, “all Americans should have equal rights, including the right to move their property.” Polk tried to compromise by suggesting that we expand the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific Ocean, with the same rules no slavery in the north of the line and slavery would be allowed south of the line. Another idea that came into play, because of this issue was, “popular sovereignty,” each territory had the right to choose for themselves and with their own representative whether or not they would be free or slave territories. In the election of 1848 both parties tried to avoid this issue as much as possible and a new party formed. They new party opposed slavery as the Free-Soil Party, their candidate was Martin Van Buren. The Free-Soil Party supported the Wilmot Proviso. Although they did not win the election it was an important event in American politics and it showed the lack of capability the current parties had to please the people on the issues. This led to the fall of the second party system.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify the Wilmot Proviso and Popular Sovereignty and the reaction of various political figures to these proposals. In the following years after the Mexican War, “Pennsylvania Democrat David Wilmot in 1846” had proposed of an amendment that read “as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico… neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory” (388). In layman's terms, Wilmot offered the idea that there was to be no slavery in any of the land gained from the Mexican War. This proviso caused a national debate between religion, government, and Northern and Southern states.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilmot Proviso Tension

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Wilmot Proviso was an attempt to settle the dispute on newly gained Mexican Territories. Slavery became a subject of discussion in Congress despite the Gag Rule, a series of rules adopted by Congress in order to prevent antislavery petitions. Slavery became a huge focus politically. Not only did the Wilmot Proviso make slavery a politically huge discussion, but it also was a step towards the Compromise of 1850. Lastly, the Wilmot Proviso caused the tension between the North and the South to increase, because the South depended on slavery the Proviso would prohibit slavery to expand to the newly gained territories, resulting in much more power for the North.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As Political parties became heated the idea of compromise was seen as even more improbable. The idea of Westward Expansion due to ‘Manifest Destiny’ led to more territorial expansion. The North wanted these future states to be slave states, but the south wished otherwise this led to more conflict in congress. After the United States Acquired land from Mexico after the Mexican-American war, things worsened. The Wilmont Proviso (which panned to ban slavery in any territory they received from Mexico) although was unsuccessful, it split political parties and led to the creation of the antislavery Republican Party in 1854.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This caused an unstable equilibrium with political parties. Two of those leaders who strongly supported the Annexation of Texas and slavery was James K. Polk and James Tyler. Opponents of Slavery viewed Tylers “unscrupulous nature of proslavery forces.”(354) They feared the annexation would spread slavery into the west if the United States gained territory. The texas annexation essentially caused an uproar in the political atmosphere, as it “revived sectional tensions over slavery and westward expansion”(O'Donnell, Edward and Cornell…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The south grew more dependant on ‘king cotton’ and slavery kept on going. More northeners believed that the south had an unfair advantage because the south had little to no labour costs as to the north they had to emply free people that cost money because of the no slave rule in their land. In 1873, texas joined the union as a slave holding state. This threatened to ruin the balance in congress achieved by thr Missouri compromise. James Polk became president in 1844. He pushed to get texas included as a slave holding state for cheap cotton production in 1846, but oregan (British owned) was added as a free state that same year. This is known as the texas compromise. Polk declared war on mexico falsly claiming that Mexicans had attacked and killed US citizenz on American soil. The Mexican war ended in 1848 with the treaty of Acudelupe Hidalgo which added more than 1 million square miles to the US. (more than he Louisiana…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War in 1861 was the outcome of built up tension due to segregation in the Northern and Southern regions of the United States. From 1789 to 1860, the conflict of slavery gained attention of whether or not the act was ethical. Although many argue the Civil War was caused by infringement on the states’ rights, it was mainly because of incongruence in the actions of the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches on slavery that led to the Civil War. Legislative Branch The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 allowed for the acquisition of a large expansion of land.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the favor of the south, it prevented the Wilmot Proviso, which would have outlawed the slave trade in all territories gained in the Mexican American War. It also introduces “popular sovereignty,” a vote from the populous, as a way for a new territory to decide whether or not they would be a slave or free soil territory. However, this was not a pure system. The territories faced the same issue as “bleeding Kansas.” The north sent their own people to the territories as did the south. It became a competition of who could send more people.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Dred Scott had been admitted as a free black then the Supreme Court would have stopped slavery governmentally. The Wilmot Proviso was also a deciding factor as well. This was bill that tried to exclude slavery from any land America might acquire from Mexico. This angered Mississippians and other southerners that the North would try to prevent them from taking slaves to the western territories. By the time the war was over, some of the Mississippian were talking about seceding from the Union and…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays