Preview

Classical India Vs Classical China Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Classical India Vs Classical China Essay
Classical China and Classical India have many similarities, but some ideas like politics and the social classes can differ from one or another. Politics was a way on how these classical civilizations had a government and what made the government had power to lead their civilization. Social class was a way to put people in ranks which was also a way for the different types of jobs they did. Politics also goes with social class since it showed that only certain types of people could be in the government. Politics and social class in Classical China was quite different compared to Classical India. At this time, politics in the ancient time were mostly monarchy and created a strong bureaucracy. Monarchy in Classical China were mostly based upon the fact of the dynasties. Some famous …show more content…
Aryans were an important role in Indian politics and social structure. Aryans’ brought the Varnas which was an early version of the caste system. The Aryans put themselves as the upper class to make them powerful over the native Indians. Later in history, Chandragupta Mauryan gained power along the Ganges River and created the first dynasty which was the Mauryan Dynasty. Chandragupta’s way of ruling made him rely on ruler’s personal and military power. His grandson Ashoka, governed two provinces. He extended the land to the southern tip by fighting which showed that he was blood thirsty. Later, the Guptas came and developed a tax system and made the caste system in a way that various races could live with each other without conflict. The caste system in India was the social pyramid and consists of priests (brahman); warriors and rulers (kshatriyas); skilled traders, merchants and minor officials (vaisyas); unskilled workers (sudras) and the untouchables (pariah). This system made Indians really rigid and stay in their place. In India, they also didn’t have any slaves since those jobs were mostly done by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Han dynasty and Mauryan/Gupta empires developed in roughly the same time frame and overlapped in the years 320 B.C.E. - 220 C.E. developing in different parts of the globes with their own unique geographies. Both the Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires developed bureaucratic governments that were ruled by kings, but due to the different geographical regions, India’s government was fragmented into local governments. The Han Dynasty of China was structured off of a social philosophy while Mauryan/Gupta India followed a religion which united the subcontinent. The Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires also both developed agrarian economies although their view on the merchant class were nearly opposite.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Aryan's migrated to the Harrapan society bringing important and useful resources such as horses, chariots, iron, and the Sanskrit language they begin to slowly overpower the Dravidians currently settled there. Since the Aryan's were the more people they decided they needed a system to help keep social classes in their rightful order. So they created the caste system. Although the development of the 1800 subcastes and the mobility in a caste changed in 500CE, the purpose of the caste system remained the same in South Asia from 1000BCE to 500CE.…

    • 678 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these cultures needed to keep order and stability within their borders to maintain a prosperous society. Han China and Gupta India both implemented a tight social class…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the classical period two early civilizations appeared. Ancient Athens arose with its intelligence and love for the human physique, while Han China arose with its strong beliefs of religion and love of nature. Even though Han China and Ancient Athens both have politically strong governments, they are very different in cultural beliefs and social structure because of how they treat women and how they feel about infanticide of babies.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical India and Mesopotamia are both ancient civilizations with many similarities and differences. Both Mesopotamia and Classical India had law codes and were a patriarchal society. Social mobility was not present in Classical India as it was in Mesopotamia. In both societies there were many things similar and many things different.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Ancient times, China and India both had their own set of beliefs; Han Wudi excerised Confucianism in China and Ashoka promoted Buddhism in India but Han Wudi was not a lover of Confucian where Ashoka himself practiced Buddhism. However both ruled with a centralized bureaucracy and policed the provinces to maintain order and policies. And lastly, neither had strict policies constricting their people nor did they have much of a justified social structure.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han vs Mauryan

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The social aspects of both empires had a lot in common because gender-roles, family and relationships were looked at in the same way. During the Mauryan/Gupta as well as the Han Dynasty, women were subservient to men and families relied on patriarchs. In both empires there were close knit villages, landowners had power and merchants took second role in the social system. However, the two had their differences. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire put emphasis on caste while the Han Dynasty was based on a social structure. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire’s caste system was an important social bond and a crucial part of the political structure. At the top of the system were the priests, then the warriors and rulers, followed by the merchants, skilled traders and minor officials, after that were the unskilled workers and finally the “untouchables”, who were outcastes and barely considered as people. The strict caste system provided a network of rules by which people could regulate their lives and activities and also promoted public order which helped politically. The caste system was so strictly enforced that no one could intermarry or be moved up a class so it determined where you would be for all your life. The caste system also played a role in religion which encouraged the use of a caste system rather than people look down upon it. On the other hand, the Han Dynasty relied on a highly structured system of classes. The most powerful was the emperor, the nobles and the military officers, who made up the first class. Next came the farmers and peasants who made up the second tier. Lastly, the third class was made up of merchants, commoners and servants. This system…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The differences between Han China and Rome’s political methods include religion, democracy and social classes. Confucianism played a major part In Chinese culture and politics however their religion did not have as much power over the power over the emperor like Christianity. In Rome, if an emperor did not listen to the Pope, the Pope can then ex- communicate the emperor. The Pope can then replace the emperor. In China, you can’t just have a Buddhist remove an emperor out of power. Secondly, in Rome the citizens had more of a democratic government. Landowners and merchants formed the Roman Republic where they could help pass laws and etc. In China only the emperor had that kind of power. By having a more democratic government the Roman citizens can have more of a say whereas the Chinese citizens can’t. Lastly, in China if you were born…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq- Han China and Greece

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After viewing the documents, it is clear that Classical Athens and Han China are very different politically. Athens focused on the rights of the individual whereas Han China preferred dominance that used an imperialist approach. However, the reason for this difference in political beliefs can be based on the difference of population. It is easier to be a democracy with a smaller population than a larger one. That said it is also easier to rule many people with a select elite. Another difference is that their social aspects are opposites. Athenians believed that everyone should obey the laws of society and turn in those who break them. Han china thought that it is better to obey the rules but should always prefer family over government. Despite many differences, both Classical Athens and Han China thought there should be class distinctions between poor and the wealthy, few and many, free people and slaves.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the civilizations that we studied thus far have some type of social class and inequality between the citizens. In both the Chinese and Roman societies, they both maintained social classes. In the Han and Qin dynasties, the social classes were divided by philosophy. For example, Confucianism. Confucianism is the idea that people should have respect for one another and it is better to be a gentleman than just a normal person. If you were a scholar-gentry were considered to be upper classman. You would be the people governing society. Changes in social class were completely out of the question. In the Roman Empire, they didn’t stress hierarchy. You were either upper or a lower class citizen. You could change your rank in social…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There were three main social groups in China. The landowning aristocracy plus the educated bureaucrats, or mandarins, made the top of the group. Second were the peasants and urban artisans who manufactured goods. Then came the mean people who were people that are unskilled. India’s social groups consists of five groups that made up the caste system. Both China and India depended on a large peasant class. Women in China and India were subordinate to men but women did have an important role to the family and society. It was said women were featured clever and strong-willed women and goddesses in Indian culture, which made it subtly different from women in China. Children in China were different than that in India. Disobedient children would be punished harshly by parents. Parents had the right to do so as said by Confucius’s quote, “There are no wrongdoing parents”. But in India, children were pampered. Both families of both countries served as an important and explicit emotional function as well as a role in supporting the structure of society and its institutions. China had an extremely well technological society (one of the best, if not the best) during their classical period. India had some technology as well. They were the first to manufacture cotton cloth, calico, and cashmere. China and India had an emphasis on trade and merchant activity, but India was far greater than China and that of the classical Mediterranean world which they used as an advantage to spread their religions. Indians traded more than China because merchants were high in society. Merchants in India were higher than merchants in China…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han China’s political control was large. This empire developed a political philosophy called legalism. Legalism advocated clear rules and harsh punishments as means of enforcing the authority of the state. With this new philosophy, Shihuangdi decided to launch a military campaign to reunify China. This empire also believed military force was very important. Han China’s leading figure was an emperor. In their government, religion often took the major role in their society. Han China also had more equality in political control than Imperial Rome.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most conspicuous of the Classical Societies developed in Persia, China, India, and the Mediterranean basin. The Classical Societies were known mainly as an enduring legacies. They were known for their influential ways that affected the way people led their lives. Each of the Classical Societies achieved skillful accomplishments. They had their similarity and differences. Although the Classical Societies were similar in ways that they endured for a long period of time and extended authority over large regions, they differed when it came to beliefs and values.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Ikat

    • 267 Words
    • 1 Page

    The ancient Indian people has a caste system goes like this Brahmin (Priest), Chetri Kshatriya, (Ruler & Warrior) Vaishya, (Merchant, Trader, and Artisan) Shudra, (Farmer and Laborer) and Untouchables. This caste system has been used throughout their whole history and will never change. With such a consistent system that is why they have last as long as they did.…

    • 267 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caste System And Racism

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page

    Because the caste system was largely based on skin color, racism was and continues to be an extremely prevalent problem in India. When the Aryans, a light-skinned people, developed the caste system, they made sure to rank the dark-skinned natives below them to establish a sense of superiority over the natives. At the top of the caste system were the Brahmans, who were the Aryan priest. Because religion was such an important part of Indian culture, the Brahmans occupied an extremely high and important place in Indian society. Below the Brahmans were the Kshatriyas, or Aryan warriors. The Vaisyas were ranked third in the caste system and were composed largely of merchants and farmers. This was seen as the commoner class. The fourth caste was occupied by the peasant class, called the Sudras. The Sudras were all non-Aryan and were dark-skinned. Their low ranking in the caste system showed what little respect the Aryans held for the natives. Below the Sudras were the lowest-ranking in the caste: the Untouchables. The extreme emphasis placed on skin color and class during this time led to many modern day internal and external issues concerning racial and social inequality. The dark-skinned people of India are still frequently looked down upon, a lasting and damaging result of tje caste system. The caste system prevented the success and development of the native people, a fact that is evident today in India's economy and…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays