Preview

Coca Cola Wars

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
264 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coca Cola Wars
The cola industry is an attractive industry if you’re a concentrate producer and an incumbent in the business. The powers of input suppliers which supply the main ingredients in cola concentrate are weak. The bargaining position of the concentrate producer is extremely strong since most of the inputs required to manufacture concentrate is relatively easy to purchase and the concentrate industry has many suppliers to offer those inputs.
In addition, analyzing the cola wars case, Coca Cola concentrate producers dictate the price at which the bottler must purchase the concentrate and also explicitly decided what items the bottlers can bottle and distribute. This illustrates the supply power of the concentrate producers as strong against the cola bottlers.
The threat of substitute products is high in the cola industry. Between the cola concentrate producers and the bottlers, the bottlers have little to no option in switching concentrate because of contractual agreements. Therefore, this makes the threat of substituting concentrate producers impossible and most significant for concentrate producers.
The treat of new entrants is very low because of the high cost associated with the industry which include, marketing a new cola, gaining name recognition, obtaining slotting space and a number of other factors makes for favorable conditions to operate for the incumbents. The rivalry among existing competitors is extremely intense however; it proves to provide benefits for the industry. For instance when Coca Cola introduces a new venture Pepsi may follow or vice versa, essentially offering more products for consumers. The intense rivalry keeps competitors from entering the industry because of the intense price

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    For this reason the Coca-Cola organization uses a duopoly type strategy in order to maximize profit potential. With the duopolies type strategy Cola-Cola can increase product prices without the concern of customer decrease. It also will give them the advantage of other market competition. By keeping product prices below of new market competitors, it can force out other competitors when they are unable to keep up product demand. Once the competition has been run out the market, Coca-Cola can increase product prices to normal (Henry…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moreover, the case also mentioned about the unequal responsibility in terms of expenses for the bottlers and the concentrate producers. Concentrate producers, like Coca-Cola and Pepsi, requires relatively small investment to build a plant compared to the bottlers, and concentrate producers’ major costs were only for advertising, promotion, and market research. In contrast, bottlers’ factories require a more substantial amount of investment, as it needed more modern and high-tech machinery. In addition, bottlers also have a total responsibility for the selling and delivery,…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2) Major concentrate producers established exclusive distribution agreements with bottlers, which were reinforced by government policies such as the 1980 Soft Drink Competition Act. These agreements prevented bottlers from carrying competitor brands and allowed existing concentrate producers to dominate the market.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently?Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently?Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently?Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Coke & Pepsi have chosen to operate primarily on the production of soft drinks syrup,while leaving independent bottlers with more competitive segment of the industry.The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in cannibalization. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. This report focuses on increasing the overall share and finding new opportunities in the unrevealed markets.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using Porter’s Five Forces analysis for the CPs industry, we determined that the Bargaining Power of Buyers was low. In 1987, Coke’s Master Bottler Contract granted Coke the right to determine the concentrate price based on a pricing formula that adjusted quarterly and stated a maximum price for the sweetener used in the production. Pepsi’s Master Bottling Agreement required that top bottler purchased its raw materials from Pepsi on terms and conditions determined by Pepsi. These agreements limited the opportunity for price negotiations between the buyers and the CPs.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The barriers are high. They can be up-front advertising, R&D cost, bottling lines equipment, and brand awareness. Firstly, megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share, left fierce competition to the other brands. Secondly, On supply-side economies of scale, the megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share and the larger volumes of products to spread fixed cost over more units. Thirdly, on demand-side benefits of scale, the impact of brand reputation is huge, for customers are more willing to buy products of megabrands. Coke and Pepsi spent $244,000 and $140,000 on average each year in 2008 and 2009,which could be an unaffordable up-front cost for new entrant.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First, supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits of scale also makes it difficult for new entrants to be accepted by the public. In 2002, a survey found that 37% of respondents chose a CSD because it is their favorite brand, while only 10% said so about bottled water. This demonstrates CSD customers’ high brand loyalty and their lack of desire to buy from new entrants. In terms of capital requirement, concentrate manufacturers only requires $25~$50 million to set up a plant that can serve the entire United States of America. Yet, new entrants may have difficulties competing with major players’ well-established brands and their large scale unrecoverable (therefore, hard to finance) spending on advertising. There is also unequal access to bottlers and retail channels for newcomers. Most bottlers are in long-term contracts with major CSD brands; also, the largest distribution channel, supermarkets, consider CSD a “big traffic draw”, thus provide little to no shelf space for newcomers. In addition, strong fear of retaliation from major players also makes newcomers hesitate to enter.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Pepper Snapple is a smaller competitor to Coca-Cola. However, Pepsico is Coca-Cola’s rival competitor due to its relative size. Both have global recognized brands that compete in product differentiation instead of pricing. For instance, a 12-ounce can of Coke is usually priced similar to a 12-ounce can of Pepsi. Nonetheless, Coke attempted to change the taste of its product in the 1980s (i.e., product differentiation). Unfortunately, the New Coke was rejected by the public and reintroduced the original Coke as Coke Classic. Finally, due to the recent decrease in buyer demand, there has been an increase in competitive rivalry between the two brands. As a result, rivalry among competing sellers has…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) industry is enormous. In 2000, more Americans drank soft drinks than water. The production and distribution of soft drinks involve concentrate producers (basic flavors), bottlers (add sweetener and carbonated water), and retailers. Of all the retailers available for distribution to customers, grocery stores and supermarkets account for about 31% of sales. There are three major competitors in the soft drink market (Coca-Cola, 44.1%; Pepsi-Cola, 31.4%; Dr Pepper/Seven Up, 14.7%). Each competitor spends a lot of money on advertising their brand through promotions, and consumer price discounting. Concentrate producers and bottlers usually share advertising costs because bottlers can target markets locally while producers focus on the bigger picture.…

    • 3374 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bargaining power of Buyers used to be negligible as concentrate producers used to make bottlers abide by fixed price contracts which made them operate on razor thin margins. After adoption of incidence pricing, the bottling plants renegotiated for different distribution channels and different product ranges as the bargaining power shifted and the prices were increased based on consumer price index and inflation. But this bargaining power was kept in check since concentrate producers did not allow a bottling plant to gain significant market influence and they regularly bought out bottling plants to maintain their control.(Exhibit 3b)…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many companies that make products that go head to head. Coca Cola and Pepsi are an example of such reveries. There has been many taste test and competitions that involved the soda kings. This reverie has been going on for over a century. (See appendix 1) The start of this long standing soda war began 1886 when creator John S. Pemberton developed the original recipe for Coke. Then 13 years later Pepsi creator pharmacist Caleb Bradham developed his formula. By this time Coca-Cola was already fulfilling order that totaled a million gallons per year. Coke then continue to develop its iconic bottle in 1921, they then secured huge name endorsements deals, expanded to Europe and Cuba, Canada and Panama. In the interim, Pepsi went…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Study

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comenzaremos tomando en cuenta la industria en el que se lleva a cabo la competencia entre firmas establecidas, los recursos de Pepsi para afrontar las amenazas y aprovechar las oportunidades que se presentan en dicha industria. Con esta información analizaremos las fuerzas, las oportunidades, amenazas y debilidades a las que se enfrenta Pepsi y propondremos una estrategia para neutralizar y convertir en fortalezas las debilidades y las amenazas. Las estrategias aquí propuestas están basadas en el modelo propuesto por Hambrick y Fredrickson, orientadas a las arenas en las que se desempeña la empresa, los pasos a seguir para la aplicación de éstas, los…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Coca Cola Company (TCCC) is an American corporation and manufacturer especially known for its soft drinks like Coca Cola or Fanta. It sells over 3500 products, is available in over 200 countries and has revenues of nearly 50 billion us-dollars (Coca Cola Company, 2011). After Coca Cola was accused by the European commission (EC) to have abused its market power, Coca Cola gave in and set up commitments to prove that it does not abuse its power. They promised no exclusivity arrangements, no target or growth rebates, no use of its stronger brands to sell other less strong brands and finally a 20 percent free space in their coolers for other products and brands. These commitments were accepted by the EC. This essay explains why the EC is concerned about the abuse of market power and analyzes the commitments stated by the coca cola company in its economic terms and how they…

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics