Preview

Cola Wars

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cola Wars
Cola Wars Case Analysis 1. The main way in which my case notes would be different for Cola Wars if I were to have a second try at writing them would be to include a breakdown of how they are able to apply to Porter’s five forces. For example, it is evident after reading this case that the soft drink industry is an extremely profitable one (especially for Coke and Pepsi). The reasons for this were discussed in class, and I will quickly explain each:

There are great barriers to entry when trying to dive into the soft drink industry, and because of this companies who have a competitive advantage will make it rather difficult for a new competitor to enter the market. Brand Equity is the first of many barriers, because large companies like
…show more content…
Because they are able to understand and know how each other works, they are less likely to want to start a price war in order to destroy one another. However, since Pepsi did enter the market later than Coke, they have been fighting to catch up and gain an advantage in market share for a long time. This is the reason as to why they have been so aggressive throughout their history, with move like doubling the amount of product received and keeping the price stable, as well as things like the Pepsi challenge, and the Pepsi refresh …show more content…
Something that I have learned from the class discussion as well s reading the case is that, Porter presents a framework that not only analyzes potential markets, but is able to give a strong representation as to if they will be attractive business ventures. Being able to correlate his framework alongside other popular business frameworks such as the SWOT analysis seem to be a good way to interpret an industry that one may be looking to enter into. They are able to breakdown piece by piece why some companies are so successful, and why some competitors fall out of contention in a rigorous market. There is much to learn from Porter and the Cola Wars case, but it is evident that competitive rivalry is what drives an industry. As well as being able to create a competitive advantage one way or another is the way to success in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moreover, the case also mentioned about the unequal responsibility in terms of expenses for the bottlers and the concentrate producers. Concentrate producers, like Coca-Cola and Pepsi, requires relatively small investment to build a plant compared to the bottlers, and concentrate producers’ major costs were only for advertising, promotion, and market research. In contrast, bottlers’ factories require a more substantial amount of investment, as it needed more modern and high-tech machinery. In addition, bottlers also have a total responsibility for the selling and delivery,…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rize Documentary

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In doing strategic analysis, it is sometimes useful to examine the industry in terms of Porter’s five forces (however, some industry characteristics critical to formulating strategy might not be apparent from this framework).…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently?Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently?Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently?Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010,” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Main activities includes combine carbonated water and syrup , bottling/ canning, delivery to customers.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke and Pepsi are two big players in the market. The competition in the market has been such in which one company goes ahead with some new product and other company adopts a proactive approach and it comes up with something new that no one takes the advantage, Because of the customer base and the market share they affect the profit of the…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 9770 Words
    • 40 Pages

    umption level since 1989.4 At the same time, the tw companies experienced their own di…

    • 9770 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1886, the Coca Cola Company was developed but it wasn 't until 1898 that the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they have tried and have failed numerous times at expanding their product and marketing capabilities. Below is a list of key products offered by both Coca Cola and PepsiCo:…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beer Wars

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Porter’s Five Forces Model is a business strategy that was covered in Beer Wars. Anat Barron described how difficult it was for small craft beer makers to be new entrants to the beer industry. When Anheuser Busch felt the least bit threatened, they had the capital and access to distribution channels that the smaller breweries did not have. The craft breweries found it greatly difficult to compete with the big 3 because they were not a substitute for the Big 3’s product, they were a small competitor. Anheuser Busch controlled the bargaining power because they were able to keep prices down due to their size and pockets while small craft breweries had to be more expensive because of the quality and care that went into it on top of having to pay a higher rate for ingredients compared to the other large corporations. To cite an example of the deep pockets that the big 3 had, Anheuser Busch came out with beer with caffeine in response to Moonshot beer, which was a craft beer (and the first of it’s kind). It can be viewed as theft but they had the pockets to Moonshot out. They targeted the bars and stores that carried Moonshot and gave them free cases of Anheuser Busch’s version of Moonshot beer. Though illegal some bars took it because it was free and busch had better prices to drive moonshot out.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First, supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits of scale also makes it difficult for new entrants to be accepted by the public. In 2002, a survey found that 37% of respondents chose a CSD because it is their favorite brand, while only 10% said so about bottled water. This demonstrates CSD customers’ high brand loyalty and their lack of desire to buy from new entrants. In terms of capital requirement, concentrate manufacturers only requires $25~$50 million to set up a plant that can serve the entire United States of America. Yet, new entrants may have difficulties competing with major players’ well-established brands and their large scale unrecoverable (therefore, hard to finance) spending on advertising. There is also unequal access to bottlers and retail channels for newcomers. Most bottlers are in long-term contracts with major CSD brands; also, the largest distribution channel, supermarkets, consider CSD a “big traffic draw”, thus provide little to no shelf space for newcomers. In addition, strong fear of retaliation from major players also makes newcomers hesitate to enter.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael Porter developed five different forces in a framework he felt influenced industries. This framework was designed to help companies find ways to off-set a rival company and to help develop a more solid business plan. It has been known over the years a rivalry has existed been two of the biggest soda companies, Coca Cola and Pepsi. Three of Porter’s forces that are exemplified in this “coke war” are buyer power, barriers to entry, and rivalry which will be explained and elaborated on in the following essay.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    unleashed a brilliant ploy to make Coke the early bird in many of the major…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soft drinks are profitable because it is a $60 billion industry in the United States alone. Not only is it profitable in the United States, but both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have expanded their franchises internationally and both have become competitive brands. It is estimated that the average American can consume about 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks a year. According to the article, Americans drink more soda than any other beverages on the market today, such as sports drinks, juices, and beers. This makes carbonated soft drinks more profitable than the other beverages because it has a higher consumption rate. Another reason why carbonated soft drinks are profitable is that it is easy to make since it is made up of a flavor base with added sweetener and carbonated water. These main ingredients are relatively cheap compared to the bottling process. Since 1970, the growth of carbonated soft drinks continues to rise 3% per year for the next 30 years because of diet carbonated soft drinks and other flavored drinks. Soft drinks are also found in supermarkets, convenient stores, vending machines, and restaraunts. This makes the soft drinks more accessible to their customers. Soft drinks are also consumed by cans, plastic bottles, glass bottles, and fountain drinks.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many companies that make products that go head to head. Coca Cola and Pepsi are an example of such reveries. There has been many taste test and competitions that involved the soda kings. This reverie has been going on for over a century. (See appendix 1) The start of this long standing soda war began 1886 when creator John S. Pemberton developed the original recipe for Coke. Then 13 years later Pepsi creator pharmacist Caleb Bradham developed his formula. By this time Coca-Cola was already fulfilling order that totaled a million gallons per year. Coke then continue to develop its iconic bottle in 1921, they then secured huge name endorsements deals, expanded to Europe and Cuba, Canada and Panama. In the interim, Pepsi went…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Compare the economics of the concentrate business to that of the bottling business: Why is the profitability so different?…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays