Preview

College Athletes: A Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
College Athletes: A Case Study
Since it seems like the universities and NCAA are unwilling to examine their case college athletes are taking matters into their own hands. At a Northwestern University, a Division I college in Chicago, these players became tired of not receiving any compensation aside from their scholarships and they made a decision that made the NCAA realize they were serious. They were aware that suing for compensation could be a losing battle they took the next step. What these players decided the best thing to do was unionize in a way similar to employees and demand the rights that they deserve. After their coach told them that they were unable to do this they took the issue to the National Labor Relations Board (NLBR) and what happened next was a giant …show more content…
College Athletes Players Association, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)…recently found that scholarship football players from Northwestern University are “employees” under Section 2(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and ordered that an election be conducted so that eligible football players (i.e., all who receive grant-in aid scholarships and have not exhausted their NCAA playing eligibility) can vote whether to form a union. (37)
Although these players are only able to unionize and have not been granted official compensation outside their scholarship this is still a very important step. This could be one of the solutions to solving the problem that college athletes are not receiving any form of payment apart from their scholarships for playing. If other Division I athletes follow in Northwestern’s example and affirm their rights the NCAA might began to take notice and realize that this issue is not going to go
…show more content…
The NCAA is not providing them with any form of compensation besides possible scholarships; this is not enough. The NCAA has set up strict by-laws that have prevented athletes from receiving compensation or even having the opportunity. They claim that because these athletes are students and maintain and armature status they do not should not receive a stipend. However, the universities these colleges are attending are seeing positive results such as coaches receiving wage raises and money from athletic department funds covering other deficits within the university. Some steps that can be taken is examining the by-laws of the NCAA and trying to modify them in a way that is beneficial for the athletes, the university and the NCAA. Players could be allowed to receive endorsements where they can make their own separate money away from the university and the NCAA. Another solution is taking some of the money these players are earning from tournaments and putting it into the pockets of the winning team’s players. Lastly these college athletes must realize that they have rights and if they feel they are being treated unfairly they can try to unionize to show the NCAA the seriousness of this situation. College athletes deserve to earn compensation, NCAA, a billion-dollar industry, and the universities these athletes are paying for can afford to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    These days athletes are getting paid under federal labor laws and entitled to form unions and negotiate wages, hours and working conditions. Most college athletes these days are getting paid under the table according to Kenneth J. Cooper. This article explains why college athletes go to certain colleges. Donald Remy, the NCAA’s general counsel and vice president for legal affairs, says court precedents and tax laws have upheld the status of college athletes as students. “Remy believes that student athletes are not employees under the law, and that they should not be treated as employees either by the law or by the schools they attend”. Tommy Amaker a former basketball star at Duke…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cronk’s article offers his professional perspective on the unjust treatment and regulations by the NCAA and why they must compensate student-athletes for their work and image. Cronk’s article quotes many NCAA guidelines and principles in order to provide the audience with reasons why the NCAA can’t pay student-athletes. The main focus of Cronk’s article…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    NCAA Cost Deficit Analysis

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, the university earns millions annually, including donations, sponsorships, and other sources of revenue. This raises the question of whether the NCAA and universities should treat students as if they are employees, because some feel they should be able to see financial gain performing for their respective university. There was the Northwestern Union case in 2014, where the National Labor Relations Board granted the College Athletes Players Association’s petition for athletes to be recognized as employees, driven by the Northwestern football team. It was granted as it was recognized that they brought in revenue for the university, and were paid back in full scholarships. The scholarship could be lost by minor team role infractions. Therefore, students lost control of their athletic and personal lives to strict regulations. They were essentially employees. This ruling was short lived however, as the university appealed and the case was not upheld as it had the potential to set a dangerous precedent once under review. However, it was clear that the NLRB is watching and can once again intervene if treatment changes to scholarship players (towards the NCAA) were subsequent. Berger vs. NCAA was also in the same time period shortly after the previous case, however it went against the U. of Penn athletes, as the work they performed seemed to benefit them more than the school. Further…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NCAA is considered a non-profit organization by many of the people that are in charge of this business. As a non-profit organization the NCAA averages an annual profit of 6 billion dollars. The volunteers of this company are made slaves by the system. The athletes no longer scoring the game winning touchdowns are soon forgotten about. Many of these athletes going in their thirties and forties are barely able to walk, and cannot go through the day without a headache. Student athletes deserve to be compensated for risking their bodies for the NCAA, and the millions of fans watching for entertainment.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming an NCAA Division 1 athlete is a dream that most kids have growing up. Having thousands of fans, friends, and peers screaming your name as you step out onto the field, hitting that walk-off homerun, catching that game-winning touchdown, scoring that game-winning goal in overtime, or even, winning the national championship, is the epitome of all college athletes’ dreams. Student-athletes represent the school they play for. They play their absolute best and give 110% every time they are out on the field, so why should they not be compensated for all of the work they put in?…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The NCAA manages everything in college sports, and is considered a non-profit organization, all of the money they make is redistributed to the colleges that are part of the NCAA. Just football, and basketball generates 6 billion dollars a year, and not one penny of that money would've been made if it were not for the student athletes. In "Pay To Play: Should College Athletes Be Paid?," Adele Birkenes and Akash Bagaria who have written six articles about student life states "It is only reasonable that student athletes have a share in the millions of dollars that their sports businesses bring in." The statements by the authors bring to light this one simple question, why can the athletes be rewarded for making the NCAA and colleges successful? Although paying college athletes is not an easy decision for the people in charge, many support paying student athletes. There has been many proposals dating back to the 1950's, but there are five proposals that have a very good chance of getting passed, and used. In the article "Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes," Dennis Johnson states "...former NCAA President Miles Brand's suggestion and allocate athletes include a $2,000-$3,000 cost of living increase to full scholarships...This would provide the athletes with the needed income for clothes, laundry, sundries, travel,…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the NCAA rules should be changed and let colleges pay their players because it will help the athletes with financial aid. In Malcolm Lemmons article Should, NCAA Athletes Get Paid he explains this quote, “ A player would be able to actually afford a decent meal and possibly send some of that money back home to support their families.”(Lemmons 1). Players in the NCAA usually come from poor places in the America and are not able to pay for meals at school and same with their families. This helps prove the point because many athletes come from low class urban area and parents do not have enough money to make good meals and also support their children by living in a nice area. Colleges have been paying player’s parents benefits or gifts for their…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People believe that the athletes should get paid for the performances they put on, it would help support the athlete through their college years. “In fiscal year 2012–13, the NCAA generated $913 million in total revenue—$769 million of which came from the 2013 March Madness men’s basketball tournament (most of this money came from television networks paying for broadcasting rights). During the 2013–14 fiscal year, the NCAA generated $989 million in total revenue. However, none of this money found its way to the student-athletes whose talents and efforts produced the revenue, even though colleges, universities, and the NCAA market college athletics with the intent of generating revenue,” (Garcia). The money that was generated by the NCAA never went toward the athletes, after all, they were the ones bringing the profit in.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent years, colleges throughout the nation have come across plenty of controversy concerning the idea of whether or not athletes should be paid to play sports in college. To this day the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) deems this a violation of their rules, and that is no matter what the amateur status of the players who make college athletics a billion-dollar business is not going to change (“Associated Press”, 2013). Even though the issue is constantly being debated and to some the answer remains "up in the air" still to this day (Dabad, n.d.), I think the answer is quite simple on why college athletes shouldn’t be paid.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But in 1948 the NCAA adopted a code that limited financial aid for athletes to tuition and fees. The NCAA has said before and they’ll say it again, they will not pay college athletes. The NCAA is who would make the decision. So it might slightly matter what the athletes have to say about being paid but it is completely their decision. The NCAA is a non-profit. So they would not be able to pay the players so the colleges would be the ones having to pay them, But colleges can’t afford to pay their players. And the colleges have to keep the stadium and or gym clean and renovate it every so often. And players are expecting to get paid? But they NCAA did come up with a compromise, since they would not pay the athletes for playing, they said that they would raise scholarships to cover full college…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years college athletics have grown dramatically. Between all of the sports there is an unbelievable amount of money made for the school. Football, mens basketball, and women’s basketball are the top sports for bringing in money. While those are the top three, they aren’t the only ones to bring in money. Every sport contributes especially if they are a winning team. Athletes struggle everyday with getting their schoolwork done and being on time to class, managing time between work, school, and sports, and it is hard for them to maintain a healthy lifestyle with little time for everything. Many believe that athletes at the college level deserve some sort of benefits whether it be, getting paid, receiving less homework, more class time, etc… Even though many people are for this, a lot of people are also against the thought of giving them more benefits.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently college athletes have granted permission to work, from the NCAA. Even with this permission, their jobs are still being monitored. For the athletes to work they cannot work for or with alumni of the…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without these star players the colleges would not be making as much money or have as much attention. The players deserve to be paid for what they have done for them, and it does not have to a multi-million dollar deal. There are many options for the colleges to compensate their players outside of the scholarship method. Even if they were able to have sponsors and make money outside of the NCAA would help them financially. What does the players dealing with another company outside of the NCAA have to affect them with?…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to John Brill, a retired professional ice hockey player, “the NCAA makes over 6 billion dollars yearly.” All this money goes to support championships and programs that benefit student athletes and for building operations. The NCAA is supposed to be a non-profit organization but they sell jerseys with the star athletes names on them. The “student-athletes” get none of the money that is made by selling their name on the jerseys. Even though they get a free education with their scholarship, college athletes should be getting some compensation for their hard work and abilities because they are expected to play as a professional, a full ride scholarship does not cover every expense, they do not get the full education that they should,…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays