Preview

Compare And Contrast Feudalism And Western Europe

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
440 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Feudalism And Western Europe
Feudalism was a form of government in Japan and Western Europe at one time. Feudalism is a decentralized form of government. It was a major system for Japan for 700 years from the 12th century. In Western Europe, it was a major system from the 9th century to the 10th century. The two feudal systems were similar because they both went into a feudal period for protection. The difference is that the Japanese went into the feudal period for protection from internal invasions and Europe wanted to be protected from external invasions. Feudalism was similar in Japan and Western Europe because they both wanted protection from attacks. Both places went through a lot of harsh warfare in their countries and many lower class people wanted protection from the breakouts, so they began to turn to the upper lords. In Japan, the peasants and artisans were worried about being killed, so they went to the daimyos or the vassal lords for protection. The peasants gave them their land and offered their service. They became farmers. The artisans became weapon makers. The daimyo, in return, protected the people from harm. In Western Europe, the serfs (peasants) were worried about attack and asked the upper lords for protection. …show more content…
They both turned into a feudal society for protection, but for protection from different forces. During the 12th century, Japan’s Imperial government is weak so fights begin to break out within Japan between different clans attempting to take control. Wars broke out everywhere between the different lords, so peasants turned to Daimyo to protect them. The samurai also contributed to this. In Western Europe, there were invaders coming from the outside. From the 9th century to the 10th century, the Vikings, Magyars, and Moors were attacking Western Europe. The government failed to protect the people, so they turned to feudalism. The serfs gave the lords their service and lord protected the serfs in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Then, in the 1500s, a new kind of warfare was introduced to Japan. Europeans began arriving in Japan, bringing with them gunpowder weapons. With that kind of power in their hands, more conflicts flared up between daimyo. By the end of the sixteenth century, though, a lord named Hideyoshi had control over most of Japan. But with his sudden death, the other feudal lords began struggling for power. Finally, a man named Ieyasu Tokugawa came out the victor, making himself the shogun and establishing the Tokugawa Shogunate.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both based on relationships between lords and vassals. In japan, lords are reffered to as shoguns and vassals were daimyo, military governors and stewards, Daimyos had their own vassals as well. This was the same in…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic benefits were exchanged between the different peoples through multiple ways, the peasants made tools, weapons and food for the samurais and the daimyos and the shoguns, in producing these things for the other groups of people they were repaid in protection by the samurais and the daimyos provided land for the peasants to farm on and grow crops to provide for their fellow in which made the lives of everyone in the Japanese systems better, and this was set in place so that there was a service that went from one person to another to make the Japanese feudal system…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the development of the first civilizations, people have been divided into groups and categories. Some civilizations are divided according to gender and age, others according to field of work, and still others by social class or standing. Several provided documents offer differing evidence, opinions, and points of views regarding feudalism, one of the many systems developed by civilizations to organize and control their populations. Feudalism is the political, military, and social system that was established during the Middle Ages. Different regions and countries adhered to this system, including Western Europe and Japan.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * While in Europe kingdoms coalesced out of the tribes that controlled areas of the continant, in Japan the move was for the unification of Japan under the leadership of a single ruler. This played into opportunities for samurai to advance in society.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudal Japan Failure

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Feudal Japan was not a very successful civilization due to the choice of feudalism. Feudal Japan has succeeded, failed, and had a rather small evolution period. Japan had succeeded in ways of battle, environmental adaptations, literature, and other influences. Japan also failed greatly in governing. Japan had made good changes during and after the feudalist period especially the governmental changes. This feudalist period of Japan started in about 1185 starting with many changes and successes. The middle of the civilization showed the most failures overwhelming the successes. The ending of the civilization was the start of evolution. Therefore, Feudal Japan had small successes but was overall a failing civilization.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social Position: The first area of important similarities was social position. They have a comparison of both of their lords, lesser lords, kings, both military, classes and peasants. These similarities are significant because both Samurai and knights showed great loyalty to their lords.The samurai warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment. According to Document A: Social Pyramids, with families the Samurai’s made up to 10%of Japan's…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai were a little higher up than Knights in the feudal social order. In the social order in feudal Japan if you were a Samurai you were a warrior who owed loyalty and military service to Dalmyos for land or regular payment. All of the Samurai plus their family made up about ten percent of Japans population. Now, Knights on the other hand were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to a lord for land. There were about twelve thousand Knights in England and Normany France in the twelfth century. (Documents A, B)…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these warriors kept an oath of loyalty to their lords and to serve them, but samurai and knights had different obligations, codes, and contracts to follow. Samurai's loyalty to their lords were hereditary (Doc B). Meaning that their contract of loyalty to their lord could last many generations in their family. In contrast, the knights contract was not hereditary and only had to be served by the one who promised to (Doc B). This means that the knight’s family or son was not forced to serve their lord and would be able to discontinue the contract once the knight was done serving. Samurai and knights both had different expectations from each other. Samurais were expected to always put their duty first according to their code of Bushido. This included their family and own personal life. Loyalty and service was the focused point in a samurai's life (Doc E). Whereas knights focused on serving and helping everyone out and not just their lord, according to their code of Chivalry. They focused on being loyal to the king, showing mercy to those who need it, being polite and helpful, and doing no wrong (Doc E).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Europeans and the Japanese have many aspects of feudalism in common, but also many that differ. Their feudalisms are more differences than similarities. The differences include their cultural and political aspects. They have similarities in the social aspects.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan and Europe during the middle ages had both been affected by agriculture, social classes, and lack of power from the king/emperor. For example, in each place, peasants provided food for the manor/village in exchange for protection from invaders. Politics also played a large role for each because they both had their own social classes. In Europe the king was on top, followed by lords, knights, and finally serfs. Japan, the shogun was on top, then the emperor, daimyo, samurai, and finally the peasants. The king and emperor were supposed to be in full control, but each was overpowered by another. In Europe many people was highly religious, so they ended up following the church instead of the king. In Japan the emperor was weak so he would take orders from the shogun so he may be able to rule the country. Overall, both Europe and Japan depended on agriculture to feed each social class in the manor/village that was ruled by a weak leader that either can’t rule on his own or competes to rule against another.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intro: Although the big empires, Europe and Japan were really successful feudalist empires and both had some similarities and differences during the 9th to 13th century, which made them unique empires in the world. Both of the empires have a similar concept of elite warriors, different treatment of women during the post-classical era, and a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system, which were the main reasons they became successful empires.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Japan and Western Europe practiced feudalism and they were both unusually successful in industrial development. They are both also proven adept at running capitalist economies, so the political accomplishments of both Japan and Western Europe have matched their economic achievements.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics