Preview

Compare Frederick Taylor's Mass Production and Eric Trists Socio-Technical Team Based Production Approaches to the Design of Work Systems

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1661 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare Frederick Taylor's Mass Production and Eric Trists Socio-Technical Team Based Production Approaches to the Design of Work Systems
1) Compare Frederick Taylor’s mass production and Eric Trist’s socio-technical team-based production approaches to the design of work systems. a) What are the characteristics and key features of each? b) Discuss the fundamental differences between them including underlying theory, methods, principles, and role of management. c) Cover the advantages and disadvantages of each system – in which context does each perform best? d) What has led to the decline of mass production in the U.S., and how can socio-technical systems improve productivity and quality?

It is amazing how humans can steadily develop new and innovative ideas that help make the world a better place economically, physically, etc; From factories and work floors to management and office buildings, many approaches were used and disposed through the ever-changing economy and great demand of change and improvement; which in some cases lead to revolutionize certain industries of our economies around the world. Frederick Winslow Taylor is the developer of scientific management, or Taylorism. A book was published in 1911, called The Principles of Scientific Management. Then during the 1960’s Eric Trist developed Socio-Technical Systems. Socio-Technical Systems or STS is similar to Frederick Taylor’s concept of scientific management but eliminates bureaucracy in the workforce. In the following paragraphs I will explain the main characteristics and key features of each approach; the fundamental differences between them including underlying theories, methods, and principles; the disadvantages and advantages of each system; and what has led to the decline of mass production in the U.S. and how can STS improve productivity and quality.
Taylor first started introducing scientific management through the Bethlehem Steel Company. Taylor and his team observed 75 pig-iron handlers, whom on averaged loaded 12.5 long tons per day, and each pig iron weighing about 92 pounds. Out of the 75 workmen Taylor

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Thompson, P and McHugh, D (1995) Work Organizations: A Critical Introduction London: Macmillan (Standard textbook on the development of different forms of working practices)…

    • 6914 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The commonality of these four (4) systems is evident, they are all management systems put into place by organizations to increase production, or meet their organizational goals; the difference between these systems may or may not be as obvious. Each has its own set of ideals, and direct their attention to specific areas within their organization based on the system of management used. Sociotechnical and organizational techniques lean more toward the personnel within a business and their happiness or willingness to work together, a…

    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changes were brought through the ideas of men like Frederick Taylor and also through the development in production from the assembly line. Frederick Winslow Taylor embraced the new principals of “scientific management,” which is also known as “Taylorism”. Taylorism is a theory of management that analyzes and combine workflows. Its main objective is improving economic efficiency, especially labor productivity. “Taylor urged employers to reorganize the production process by subdividing tasks.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CONTEMPORARY APPROACH

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain how the four contemporary approaches to management are different from one another. Define “open systems” and describe the internal, competitive, and macro environments of an organization. Lastly, indicate whether the four contemporary approaches to management are relevant in these three environments and why or why not. You may research external sources to support your answer. Cite any external sources used.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mini Case

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a. Classify the two alternatives in terms of what type of application architecture they use.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    In 'The Ideas of Frederick.W.Taylor: An evaluation ', there are various key themes and principles evident which have provided the foundations for some contemporary styles of management. The author suggests that Taylor 's concept of scientific management can be likened to the works of Thomas Edison. Scientific Management is Taylor 's most widely recognized principle. Taylor believed in a 'scientific approach toward managerial decisions making '. That managerial decisions should be based upon 'proven fact rather than on tradition... ' This principle proved to be most effective when selecting workmen and the time taken to complete a task, through scientific selection and time and motion studies, the man most suited to a particular type of work will be chosen, who is able to complete the work within a specific time frame through the 'one best way '. Taylor believed in the standardization of tools and procedures becoming cohesive, allowing for effective and efficient work time, with adequate rest and pause breaks and shorter working hours. To motivate the worker…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The initial approach to management would be the theory of sociotechnical systems. Investigators considered that for a business to be prosperous it would require the technical and the social system to effort together in harmony. The social system comprises of the employees, their skills, knowledge, attitude and their perceptive of their job. While the technical system comprises of the items the employee requires for doing their job like devices, tools, or also techniques. Both systems would effort jointly to generate an effect that would be useful to the organization. [Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2013).]…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientific management was developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856 – 1915) at the end of the nineteenth century to improve labor productivity by scientifically analyzing and establishing optimal workflow processes. Taylor believed that in the same way that there is a best machine for each job, so there is a best working method by which people should undertake their jobs. He considered that all work processes could be analyzed into discrete tasks and that by scientific method it was possible to find the “One Best Way” to perform each task. Each job was broken down into component parts, each part timed and the parts rearranged into the most efficient method of working.…

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Liu, X. and Errey, C. (2006) Socio-technical systems - there 's more to performance than new technology. PTG Global. April 14, 2011, from http://www.ptg-global.com/PDFArticles/Socio%20technical%20systems%20-%20There 's%20more%20to%20performance%20than%20new%20technology%20v1.0.pdf…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personal Ethics

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Frederick Taylor (1856-1915) was the founder of the scientific management theory during the time of the Industrial Revolution. The management theory developed to organize and teach work process in a scientific manner increased productivity and profit. Taylor believed that using a scientific method for each element or task of an individual’s work would increase productivity. A worker’s job could be measured with scientific accuracy by using time and motion studies and the expertise of experienced workers (managers). A scientific system was established to hire, train, and promote workers based on their competence and abilities and match them to the most appropriate job. Productivity would be improved through scientific selection and progressive development of the worker. The relationship between the managers and workers needed to be cooperative and interdependent. The manager was to plan, prepare and supervise. The workers were to do the work. Financial incentives were used as a reward and workers were reimbursed according to their level of production (Marquis & Huston, 2009).…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management Styles

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to (Peak 2007) administration is management and supervision; it takes both in order to organize a group of people working toward a common goal. Administration in order to be considered good has to be able to build a relationship with the group that focuses on the best way to get the job done that works best for everyone. Management and supervision is only good if it can motivate the employees. This paper will focus on three types of management styles Scientific Management, Human Relations Management, and Systems Management. The first to be discussed is Scientific Management. Fredrick W. Taylor known as the father of scientific management his style was to change the way the task was done in order to make the job simply. This was done by training the worker to do a specific job in the best way .Taylor wanted to improve the amount of work an individual could do without getting tired. This was done by selecting people physically fit for heavy jobs or best suited for other jobs. His philosophy was that simple task could be planned in a way that would increase productivity. He used a stop watch to time the workers at a given task this study was called time and motion. In this study he used a sequence of movement to determine the best way to perform the job. He would check out how fast workers could perform a certain job before becoming tired then he would group them together. He found out not all workers were suited for the same job therefore they should be trained and place in jobs they were suited for in order to improve…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Scientific management also known as Taylorism (Mitchan 2005) is a set of rules that govern job design in manufacturing department. Taylor(1911), the pioneer of scientific management first came up with the theory in the late nineteenth century after viewing widespread inefficient work or soldiering among workers. Taylor’s promotion of time and motion study, production-control methods and incentive pay” (Burrell and Morgan 1979,Littler 1982 cited in Green 1986) has made great contributions to the boom of production since they were applied in practice. With the emergence of knowledge and information society which is science, technology and innovation intensified (Fagerberg, landstorm,Martin 2012 ),whether scientific management is still appropriate and effective in the modern society is uncertain. This article will explore suitability of scientific management in the new era. Firstly, principles of scientific management and influence of these principles in practical management will be reviewed followed by critiques of scientific management pointed out in the human relations movement. Then analysis of appropriateness and inappropriateness of scientific management in modern organizations will be illustrated in detail. Finally, conclusions will be made upon how to apply scientific management in the modern organization with modification of its demerits and giving full play to its merits to satisfy the demand of modern society.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niepce, W., & Molleman, E. (1998). Work design issues in lean production from a sociotechnical systems perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the next step in sociotechnical design? Human Relations, 51, 259–288.…

    • 9163 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taylor’s scientific management still applies well in today’s management. Its theory of standardizing task; motivating workers through financial rewards; treating workers as interchangeable parts are widely used in nowadays’ management. For example, George Ritzer (2000) notes Taylor’s theory of “there is only one best way” has an application in the McDonalds’ fast food chain, “It told operators… precise cooking times for all products and temperature settings for all equipment”. Not only this, Taylor’s theory of deskilling was applied in Henry Ford’s faith in mass production. With Fordism, jobs are automated or broken down into unskilled or semi-skilled tasks. (Sean Priestley, 2005)…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With those evocative words, Frederick W. Taylor had begun his highly influential book; “The Principles of Scientific Management” indicating his view regarding management practices. As one of the most influential management theorists, Taylor is widely acclaimed as the ‘father of scientific management’. Taylor had sought “the ‘one best way’ for a job to be done” (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2003, p.39). Northcraft and Neale (1990, p.41) state that “Scientific management took its name from the careful and systematic observational techniques it used to design jobs and arrange work for the rank-and-file factory worker.” From this portrayal it can be deduced that scientific management, as the name indicates, indeed is ‘scientific’; i.e. based on proven facts rather than guesswork. Although many others have contributed to it, the work of Taylor is generally regarded as the key principles of scientific management theory.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays