Preview

Compare Purpose of a State in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Machiavelli’s Political Thought

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare Purpose of a State in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Machiavelli’s Political Thought
Compare purpose of a state in ancient Greek philosophy and Machiavelli’s political thought

Introduction
What is a state? In different times in different places different people understood the meaning of this word in a different way. Definition for this term was being gathered for ages modifying and evaluating as the times went by (already since the times of Ancient Greece (beginning ~1000 BC)). It can be explained by differences in level of knowledge people had, political situation, and “moods” which privileged in public. What is the purpose of a state? This question lies in the bases of a “state” conception and answer to it can be evaluated out of the history of this term.

So, as it was said before, the state and the purpose of a state were understood differently by different people in different times. In this essay I am going to review understanding and explanations of the “purpose of a state” in general, and compare thoughts of Ancient Greece philosophers (Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle) to ones of the Italian political philosopher of XV-XVI centuries – Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli, simultaneously comparing understanding of a “state” and “a purpose of a state” of two different time periods and two different nations in order to make a conclusion of what is a common principle all states are or should base on.

Appearance of a “state”
From the very beginning every person is born free, with his basic needs and abilities. In ancient times, when there still was no such conception as state or government each person was a separate, independent unit. Each one controlled his own actions and produced everything he needed with his own hands. Each man was his own police, judge and jury which was very taxing on his time and energy. (Locke, 2005) So, how did humans come from being separate sovereign entities to form a government? Why would one give up his autonomy and a right to make final decisions to someone else?

First of all, there comes one of



References: Hooker, R. (1996) Ancient Greece: The Archaic Period: 800-500 B.C. Available: http://wsu.edu/~dee/GREECE/ARCHAIC.HTM, 21.october Locke, J Miller, F. (2002) Aristotle 's Political Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-politics/, 21.october 2008 Nederman, C

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1.State: A state is an area organized into a political unit and ruled by an established government that has control over its internal and foreign affairs.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Rome Become Good?

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In ancient Greece there was a situation where there were multiple city-states in a relatively small area that all had different political ideologies. These City States had highly regarded philosophers that wrote great lengths about them. This gives us a great foundation to try to understand the different systems and how they were based. The goal is to analyze some of the different ideologies and find why they were thought to be so good, and what made them good.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was at his time and continues to be now days one of the most influential and revolutionary authors known throughout the centuries. His writings, distinct from other renaissance authors of the epoch, make emphasis on his personal views and his opinions on the political matters taking place in Florence, Italy. Further discussed in the text are two of Machiavelli’s most renowned works, The Prince and the Discourses on Livy. Both books comprehend Machiavelli’s understandings of politics and explicit analysis on the various methods of governments with respect to principalities and republics.…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle a Greek philosopher born in Macedonia in 394 BC has different forms of viewing politics. He describes the polis, or city, as a koinonia, or political association, and he proclaims that all relations, like all thoughtful human acts, are shaped with the objective of accomplishing a particular good. He says that being part of a polis is the only way someone can be a part of a great life. Because politics are necessary for this Aristotle says, "Man is by nature a political animal."(Aristotle 90). As part of the books discussion of the economy a city-state needs, Aristotle defends the system of private property and argues against extreme capitalism and says that slavery is necessary in order for society to function and democracy as being…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Through Aristotle’s work in Politics, he articulates several fundamental aspects of political philosophy that has been greatly influential. Two specific philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Thomas Aquinas, evaluate Aristotle’s perspective of the political nature in relation to mankind. Thomas Aquinas uses Aristotle’s principles as a foundation for his reasoning in writing “On Law, Morality, and Politics.” He modifies Aristotle argument by contributing the religious sphere into the fundamental principles of his political teachings. Thomas Hobbes, on the contrary, is a lot more critical of Aristotle and attacks a lot of his political principles in “The Leviathan.” Hobbes perceives individuals as corrupt, untrustworthy and selfishly motivated, without…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tma 07 - Ema

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The German sociologist Max Weber defined the state in a lecture given in 1918 as ‘A human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory’. (Blakely & Saward, 2009, Page 361) This implies, the state being the government and has control over a certain country or area. Therefore, in this definition, the state is…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that humans are brutal, selfish, and fickle while Plato was an idealist who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled over the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his view the philosopher-king was in charge of making the state a "utopia" in that everyone had his/her place and all worked together for the common good of the state. Machiavelli said that this was a foolish idea. Machiavelli philosophy of government was centered on the ruler. He believed the king, or despot, had the right to do whatever was necessary for his own gain, or whatever the monarch considered the "good of the state" which he called Virtu’. Machiavelli believed the only purpose for a ruler was to make war, and protect its citizens from attacks by other states. He advocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in order to crush hopes of revolution - even rationalizing that it was worth the risk of revolution should it anger the people. Machiavelli believed a ruler should be immoral using deception and illusion for power and never allowing the people to know the “real” him…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state is a self-governing body that is independent, has a permanent population as well as a defined territory and is self-supporting. It acquires the power to create and modify legislation. Therefore a state has sovereignty over its territory; this indicates that is has considerable economical, political, social and legal power. The state however also has an obligation to address the needs of the individuals of the state as well as the community, yet; on the other hand legislation is introduced to help limit the power of the state. When the needs of the individual come in difference with the varying needs of the sate, conflict arises; thereby it is required for the needs of the individual and the state to be in balance. Citizens of a sovereign state are able to challenge state power in two ways: by informal means and formal means.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Governments get their power from the people. Since all people have the rights, the unalienable rights, people agree to form governments to protect their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mkt 421 Week 1

    • 2664 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Participation (2 points per week, ½ point per qualifying day - 2 substantive posts = qualifying day)…

    • 2664 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Polybius’ The Histories describes the merits of the Roman Empire, specifically their constitutional government, compared to the Ancient Greek governmental systems. These merits include combining the best parts of each form of Greek government, maintaining a stalwart government system that follows the rule of law, and the positions of government that spread power enough to keep from corrupting it. Despite this, there is corruption within the Roman government, but not so much that the ideals and laws of the state are jeopardized.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Aristotle's Politics, he focuses much on the regimes of an oligarchy and of a democracy. Democracies exists when the free and poor, being a majority, have authority to rule, and have an equal share in the city. Oligarchies exists when the few wealthy and better born have authority and grant benefits in proportion to a person's wealth (1280a:10-30;1290a:5-10).…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sparta Vs Athens

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many cultures have admired the ancient city-states of Athens and Sparta and have desired to imitate features of their cultures and governments for their own. Subsequently, this has led to both city-states having a long lasting influence on the modern compositions of many world governments. This paper will briefly delve into the governmental structures and who could participate in the governmental process in the ancient city-states and will conclude with the author’s opinion on their lasting influence.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics