I was shocked to read the comments used to describe teenagers in the Daily Mail article.
The article informs the reader that young teenage girls are caked in a lot of makeup .I don’t think that they should be criticized because it is the girls choses of what they want to wear if that is not enough we are also told about ‘one panda eyed teenager’ .
One alarming point made by you is that girls are described as’ Walking talking dolls’ and one ‘panda eyed teenagers’. I feel that this article make young teenaged girls who wear a lot of makeup feel like zoo animals. This can also show that young teenagers don’t care about their education and they care more about their appearance. On the other hand the teenaged girls could be wearing a lot of makeup because they might have something to hide behind as they can be really insecure. Also you cannot talk about young teenagers wearing makeup as there is no one in the media that does not wear makeup and now days there is not one person that does not wear makeup everyone does. When saying walking talking Bratz dolls we know that Bratz dolls have large heads and have a lot of makeup so the writer is trying to say that the girls are dolls and they all ways want to look good but is there anything wrong with looking good?
Frankly I am stunned by the way you make teenagers sound like imbeciles and illiterate beings. ‘What is pie where does it come from’? This makes teenagers sound really uneducated however this question is only asked by one teenager. This is highly stereotypical view point. You cannot judge all school children to…whole school for just one person as they can be a lot of people that are really educated. By you quoting what the girl had said how do we know if she has any problem or she has a problem with hearing. On the other hand there are many people that don’t know what is pie so there is no problem with someone not knowing what pie is.
You don’t show any of the positive things about the