Preview

Comparing and Contrasting Political Ideologies: Robert Kaplan vs. Noam Chomsky

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing and Contrasting Political Ideologies: Robert Kaplan vs. Noam Chomsky
CGW4U
Isabel Juergensen
Mr. Neufeld
27/10/13

Comparing and Contrasting Political Ideologies
Robert Kaplan vs. Noam Chomsky

1. Chomsky Thesis Outline: The main points within Noam Chomsky 's thesis revolve around his idealistic values and his concept of ' 'Elemental Morality ' '. When describing his concept of ' 'Elemental Morality ' ' Chomsky explains that if people cannot rise to the level that has them apply the same standards to themselves that they apply to others, they have no right to talk about what 's right and wrong. A common example of this hypocrisy has been executed by the United States-whom Chomsky claims to be a ' ' leading terrorist state ' '- in an attempt to justify their country’s terrorist acts. In other words, when they do it it 's terrorism, but when we do it its counterterrorism. When looking at the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the war aims were claimed to be to overthrow the country 's brutal dictator Saddam Hussein, in which they succeeded. The U.S. has a history of using the fight for democracy as a justification for overthrowing regimes. However, Chomsky argues that the best way to overthrow power centers and brutal regimes is to do so from within with support of internal democratic organizations. Ironically the very regimes that are being fought against have commonly been found to have support from the U.S.: South Eastern Turkey (the Kurds), Nicaragua in the 1980s, Israel, and Afghanistan during the 1980s to name a few. In Chomsky 's eyes all of these atrocities are all equally immoral simply because they are all atrocities. Chomsky explains that if we want to stop comparing atrocities, the easiest way is to stop participating in them and try to find other ways to deal with them. As a result, as long as people are able to think for themselves and free themselves from 'the right wing imperialists ', then they can pose the same elementary morality, levels of violence and



Bibliography: Chomsky, Noam. 9-11. New York: Seven Stories, 2001. 40-55. Print. Kaplan, Robert D. "Interventionism 's Realistic Future." Washington Post (2006): 1-2. Print Mendes, Errol. "The Cost of Non-intervention in Syria." The Cost of Non-intervention in Syria. Ottawa Citizen, 26 Aug. 2013. Web. 27 Oct. 2013. ""The Reasons for My Concern"" Interview by Celia Jakubowicz. Noam Chomsky and U.S. Foreign Policy. Third World Traveller, n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2013. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    It was 1944, and the United States had now been an active participant in the war against Nazi Germany for almost three and a half years, nearly six years for the British. During that period occurred a string of engagements fought with ferocious determination and intensity on both sides. There is however, one day which stands out in the minds of many American servicemen more often than others. June 6, 1944, D-Day, was a day in which thousands of young American boys, who poured onto the beaches of Utah and Omaha, became men faster than they would have ever imagined possible. Little did they know of the chaos and the hell which awaited them on their arrival. Over the course of a few hours, the visions of Omaha and Utah Beaches, and the death and destruction…

    • 3035 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Perloff, James. "Trial Run For Interventionism." The New American 22 Aug. 2012: n. pag. Web. 15 Dec. 2014.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guest, Robert. "Examining America 's Role in Global Affairs." VOA. Voice of America, 31 Oct. 2009. Web. 14 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that a person’s fate can be closely attributed to his or her own efforts is…

    • 1444 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The conclusion from the author is any call to indict the United States for torture is therefore a lame diseased attempt to arrive at a moral equivalence between those who defend civilization and those who exploit its freedoms to hollow…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DeConde, A., Burns, R. D., Logevall, F., & Ketz, L. B. (Eds.). (2002). Encyclopedia of American foreign policy (2nd ed.) (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Scribner 's.O’Malley, M. (1999)…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tactical definition of terrorism in Coady’s essay is the organized use of violence to target non-combatants for political purposes. Non-combatants are any person’s that do not directly coherence with the agents of aggression. The just war tradition tells us the conditions under which it can be right to resort to war (jus ad bellum) and to guide us in the permissible methods by which we should wage a legitimate war (jus in bello). Given the just war tradition and the tactical definition of terrorism, terrorism is morrally wrong. In addition, the supreme emergency must be accounted for. The definition of supreme emergency allows for the violation of the normal immunity of terrorism to be permissible in warfare, though only with a heavy burden of remorse. However, the theory of supreme emergency suffers from grave defects whether it is offered as an exemption on behalf of a state, or some less established political community, or a group claiming to represent either.Therefore, all forms of terrorism and their exemptions are morally wrong.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Funding for the Military

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Cost of Israel to US Taxpayers. (n.d.). Retrieved October 30, 2012, from If Americans Knew: http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stats/cost_of_israel.html…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article speaks about the recent new that a coalition of seventy partners, which includes the United States, has gotten involved in the Syrian Uprising by pledging to donate millions of dollars and communications equipment to the rebel groups in Syria who are opposing Assad's rule. This move by the U.S and other Western powers symbolizes the start of a new type of involvement in Syria, perhaps a more direct one. This move by these powers have caused many Syrian rebels and people observing all over the world to question whether diplomacy and/or sanction methods can truly end the Syrian regime's oppression of their people. This more direct shift of action by the Western and Arab allies of the Syrian rebels toward balancing the military balance in Syria is dangerous regionally because the crisis there is similar to a proxy conflict, which could possibly aggravate sectarian tensions. The Syrian rebel army is currently overmatched by the regime forces in terms of weapons.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Truth about Torture,” Charles Krauthammer critically analyzes the John McCain, an individual with tremendous moral influence who was tortured by the North Vietnamese, amendment. This amendment would prohibit all forms of torture from being executed on war prisoners of America. In response, Krauthammer states that in certain scenarios, torture is not “just permissible, but also morally required.” He divides the war prisoners into the following three classifications: ordinary soldiers arrested on the battlefield, captured terrorists, and finally, terrorists who possess information. With regards to the ordinary soldiers, McCain’s amendment is justified because although these war prisoners are on the opposite side of the conflict, they are nonetheless lawful fighters who committed no crime. On the contrary, Krauthammer believes that the terrorists are not worthy of the same protection and privileges since they intend to harm innocent citizens.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non-Intervention Essay

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Matas, David. "Debate: Non-interventionism." 24 2010. International Debate Education Association, Online Posting to Debatepedia. Web. 15 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War on Terror Research Paper

    • 2484 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Bibliography: Bilmes, L. (2006, February). The economic costs of the iraq war: An appraisal three…

    • 2484 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our view, as a threshold matter, humanitarian intervention that occurs without the consent of the relevant government can be justified only in the face of ongoing or imminent genocide, or comparable mass slaughter or loss of life. To state the obvious, war is dangerous. In theory it can be surgical, but the reality is often highly destructive, with a risk of enormous bloodshed. Only large-scale murder, we believe, can justify the death, destruction, and disorder that so often are inherent in war and its aftermath. Other forms of tyranny are deplorable and worth working intensively to end, but they do not in our view…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics