Preview

Comparing Aristotle And Descartes In The Meditations On First Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
866 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Aristotle And Descartes In The Meditations On First Philosophy
The soul is the essence of the immortality of living things. It can have many different meanings according to the philosopher. In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle believes that every animate being is a living thing because it has a soul. He explains that each living thing cannot exist or function without a soul. In contrast, In the Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes believes that the nature of the mind is completely separate from that of the body. He thinks it is possible that both mind and body can exist without one another. While both philosophers come from different time periods, both explore the meaning of the mind, soul, and body. Although Aristotle and Descartes are both well-respected philosophers, their teachings differ significantly …show more content…

He explains that those three elements have a nutritive soul, which initiates and guides their most basic functions like the absorption of food, growth and reproduction of its kind. All animals and some plants have a sensitive soul in which they perceive features of their surrounding in which they perceive features of their surrounding and move in response to the stimuli it provides. Human beings have both sensitive soul and rational thought that permits representation and thought. Each living thing has just one soul. The actions of which one exhibits some degree of nutritive, sensitive, rational functioning. This soul is the formal, efficient, and final cause of existence of the organism. The material cause resides purely in the body. Thus all the operations of the organism are explained in terms of the function of its soul. Human Knowledge is broken into three parts: sensation, thought, and desire. First is Sensation, which is the passive capacity for the soul to be changed through the contact of the associated body with external objects. There are a variety of sensations. The result in the souls becoming potentiality is what the object is in actuality. The soul takes on the form of the object. For example, when I …show more content…

Descartes believes that the nature of the mind is completely different from that of the body. It is possible for one to exist without one another. A rational idea that the soul is immortal presuming that the mind and the soul are more or less the same thing. In the Sixth Meditation Aristotle states, “On the one hand I have a clear and distinct idea of myself, in so far as I am simply a thinking, non-extended thing, and on the other hand I have a distinct idea of body, in so far as this is simply an extended, non-thinking thing. And accordingly, it is certain that I am really distinct from my body, and can exist without it.” (Descartes ). Descartes is explaining that I have a clear and distinct idea of the mind as a thinking, non-extended thing I have a clear and distinct idea of body as an extended, non-thinking thing. Therefore, the mind is really distinct from the body and can exist without it. Descartes clarifies what he means by a “clear/distinct idea” in his work. He claims that both premises his idea of the mind and his idea of the body excluding all other ideas that don’t belong to them. This includes each other and all that remains what can be clearly understood of each. Descartes clearly and distinctly understands the mind all by itself, separate from the body and body all by itself, separate from the mind. His ability to clearly and distinctly understand them separately from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The origin of the “soul” comes back from the time when God first “breathed life into Adam” and he became living.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The soul resembles the divine, and the body resembles the mortal being, so it is expected that the soul is everlasting. McInerny also writes how humans create unmanageable diversity. This means that every being has standard cognitive equipment inside of them. Furthermore, McInerny explains how this relates to Plato and Aristotle about the the capacity to know more; getting to know Truth, Beauty, and Goodness. McInerny’s point validates how the soul is immortal, since humans will not know the true Forms until after death.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    5. What is the point of Descartes' doubt about having a body? Why can't a thing that thinks, an "I think" (cogito), be a body? What is a body?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato considered the soul ‘to be the immortal essence of the person’ and to house three individual parts- Reason, Emotion, and Desire (Jowett, 2007). While the soul…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "...the soul itself if the principle of being, and therefore, once created, cannot not be." (2)…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Descartes Sixth Meditation, Descartes argues the fact that something is clearly possible to separate from something else, they can definitely exist individually (Walker, 1870). In simple term, something that exists individual is a distinctive entity. Therefore, as the mind and the body can be clearly conceived apart from one another, the mind and the body are indeed distinct from each other. That’s not the only argument in The Sixth Meditation. The conclusion of Descartes’s argument is that the mind is really distinct from the body, and can exist without it. Mind and body are undeniably a substance as mind is really distinct from body. As an example, if A and B are numerically distinct substances, definitely they can exist without each other. Since this possibility of separate existence, it is both a consequence and a sign of real distinction. Therefore, not only that mind and body are numerically distinct, but that they are numerically distinct substances. Besides that, the fact that A and B are clearly and distinctly conceive one thing apart…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that one can understand the mind to exist separately from the body. The middle term of the argument, as noted in the major premise is the separate understanding of two things, and he presents the idea of mind and body as the minor term. Descartes devotes a larger share of the argument to defending the minor premise, perhaps because the idea of body and mind as separate substances is more controversial than a general notion of separate substances as distinct. He goes on to expound not only the idea that the mind and body are separate, but that the essence of the human being lies in its nature as a thinking thing. As thought is the essence of the human being, and the principle attribute of the mind is thought, the mind can therefore be seen as more fundamental to humans than the body. Descartes acknowledges that it is likely for a body to be joined to the mind, however he maintains that one can still conceive of both body and mind as separate substances. And as the essence of the body is extension rather than thought, it is fundamentally less relevant to a thinking…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Divisibility

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes believes the mind is not dividable. He believes that the mind has no mass. I would have to agree the mind does not have any mass and is just housed in our body. It does the thinking for our body and is still somewhat of a mystery. The mind which I believe to be our soul uses the body as a home. As a young child I’m taught that the soul lives on even when my body is no more. I believe the mind is a gift from God and controls the body for as long as my mind continues to…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people, also known as dualists, disagree with this statement, as they believe in the existence of soul in human beings. NDE is one their main arguments. They claim that NDEs show there must be a part of us that can exist without our bodies, because a patient once heard the conversation of the surgeons during her operation of the brain where her senses should be numb. This also proves that the soul is free from the body. Moreover, some dualists feel like there is something which is in charge of their body, however, separate to it and human beings are not simply a physical body. Also, they think the soul is what makes human unique and different to animals. Without that, humans are nothing special.…

    • 334 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My body and my mind cannot be one and the same, because I should either know both of them or know neither of them. Since I know I am a thinking thing, and know that my body and my mind are two separate things, I can conclude that I am not a bodily thing. Therefore, I am only a thing that thinks." In so arguing, however, Descartes would commit the so-called "intentional fallacy" of basing an argument on what one does not know. If two things had to be either both known or both not known in order to be identical, we could argue that Bruce Wayne and Batman are not one and the same as…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to begin analyzing Aristotle and Descartes contribution to our notion of a person, we need to be able to understand what the term ‘personhood' means. Unfortunately there is no clear answer, with philosophers still presenting conflicting ideas. However by asking questions such as; is ‘personhood' identical to human being? What is the essence of a person? What relation does a person have with the world? When does personhood begin? At what point if ever does it end? And finally what makes a good person? We move closer to a set of characteristics that make up a person. Therefore we can judge Aristotle and Descartes contribution to a person by evaluating their answers to such questions.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, one of the solutions for the Mind-Body Problem is Dualism, in which Descartes uses the argument of the “Indubitable Existence”. Written in the Second Meditation, Descartes suggests, “You can’t doubt that you have a mind, as you will find yourself entertaining a thought, and therefore you must grant that you have a mind …that it is possible to doubt that you have a body… therefore one can conclude that your mind must have a property your body lacks”. (Sober, 2013; pp.206)…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes S Myth

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page

    In “Descartes’s Myth,” Gilbert Ryle main conclusion is that the body and mind are two separate beings.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Throughout history, there has been a variety of opinions and theories regarding the body and the soul. The two most common known philosophies regarding the body and the soul are Plato’s theories and Buddhism. Each have their own ways of viewing how the body and the soul connect to each other and how they function during a life. Buddhism, an old eastern religion that believes in no monotheistic creator and reincarnation. Buddhist’s also have their own notion that creates a connection between the soul and the body. Despite the differences between the two philosophies, I will argue that there are greater similarities between Plato’s and Buddhism’s notions of the soul. Throughout this essay, the ideas of parallel interpretations of the soul, individual…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays