Comparing Kant And Homosexuality

I personally believe the Kant is wrong when he says the we are advancing towards a universal morality. I believe the “morality” is something that changes over time, and something that we as a species make up. Throughout history there have been many definitions of whet is constituted as moral and what’s not. Homosexuality is an easy one to write about in this regard. For example, in the ancient Roman times it was completely acceptable to have a same-sex relationship, and nobody would get judged for doing it. Advance to the early 1900s and homosexuality becomes immoral due to a change in the dominant religion. Morality has always had a close tie to religion, and the two will probably never separate. Morality is also sometimes tied very closely