“The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” by Christopher Marlowe, “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” by Sir Walter Raleigh, “Raleigh Was Right” by William Carlos Williams all have differing views views on relationship either being all naive and optimistic about it being the most beautiful thing ever as seen with “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” using imagery and parallel structure such as "And a thousand fragrant posies", and "If these delights thy mind may move,
Then live with me, and be my love." or being pessimistic and that love will eventually fade like us and the universe example being “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” and“Raleigh Was Right” with such iconic examples of imagery such as "Had joys no date, nor age no need/" A honey tongue, a heart of gall/", "In folly ripe, in reason …show more content…
The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” also uses imagery to describe relationships but rather than using the positive traits of nature it uses the negative traits to show a more negative side of relationships.“Raleigh Was Right” uses the negative part of nature to show how nature cannot provide for humans and humans should not have a relationship with it because of it. "Rules of the Game” develops the muddled complexes of relationship by showing the relationship of waverly and her mother. The Marlowe develops the idea that human relationship are beautiful part of nature, but Raleigh and William both use the same comparison of nature but to negatively paint relationship. Amy shows us both side of the argument and uses both good and bad qualities of relationships.There are many lessons one could acquire from these poems,but the most prevalent one is whether our relationships are more positive than negative and that it's okay to have some negative traits in a relationship after all people are only