Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Compassion, Welfare, and Poverty

Powerful Essays
1083 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compassion, Welfare, and Poverty
Welfare: handouts to the lazy, or a helping hand to those facing hard times? The debate continues, even in the face of sweeping welfare reform, which, for all of its sound and fury, has not helped or changed much. What's wrong with welfare and how can we fix it? This is not a simple question, and there is no simple answer. However, one thing remains eminently clear. Welfare desperately needs to change. But where are we now? Are we headed backward or forward? Does anybody even care? In “The Compassion Gap in American Poverty Policy” by Fred Block, Anna C, Korteweg, and Kerry Woodward, with Zach Schiller and Imrul Mazid (2006) it is discuss that “Every 30 to 40 years, Americans seem to discover that millions of our citizens are living in horrible and degrading poverty.”(pg. 1) The authors question the fact as to why it is that poverty becomes so invisible during these periods of detection. They state that societies recognize the needs for the poor as well as the moral obligation to hand out help, but yet turn their back on these same people in need. Their theory is that the compassion gap results from two key dynamics. “First powerful groups in American society insist that public help for the poor actually hurts them by making them weak and dependant. Second the consequence of reduced help is that the assertions of welfare critics turn into self-fulfilling prophecies.” (pg. 1)They establish that those living in poverty seem to vanish from public eye as society fails to recognize the pain which is inflicted by poverty. The authors discuss that people in need get reprimanded and receive little or no public assistance. They are perceived to be in the situation they are in because of their own failures. They state that the “Compassion Gap is a deep divide between society’s moral commitments and how we actually treat those in poverty.” (pg. 1) It is not a pretty sight. Welfare in Laredo, a case that deeply touched many is that of Rachelle Grimmer who had moved to Laredo from Ohio. She lived with her two children Ramie and Timothy who were twelve and ten years of age in a tiny trailer the size of one standard bedroom. Grimmer would always roam the streets after midnight and beg closing crews at restaurants for food they planned to throw away. Her children were home taught by her as they did not attend school due to the fact that they were limited in clothing and transportation. They would bathe outside the family's tiny trailer house with the garden hose. Timothy wore the same camouflage shorts day after day. Grimmer didn't have a job, and the state had denied the family food stamps and emergency help despite repeated requests. This woman sold her old truck which was her means of transportation, in order to temporarily feed her children. Ms. Grimmer came to the end of her rope, after being turned down for public assistance repeatedly. She took her own life and that of her two children in the same human resource center where she had been denied assistance. In her desperation for help she took a case worker hostage who would later be traded for the office manager. Grimmer would later release him. Worst yet, were negotiations with Ms. Grimmer to surrender. The evening of the incident, our mayor was on top of a roof top raising funds for toys which would be given to children for Christmas. I question why the mayor did not abandon his post and prioritize the circumstances. Where was the compassion? Why was it that the welfare employees, who are qualified, licensed, and education, fail her? It didn’t take a genius to figure out the true need this woman had. One visit by a case worker to her place of residency would have been enough evidence of her circumstances’. This case has not been clearly publicly exposed. However, in my opinion it is irrelevant because the obvious is well exposed by society members who witnessed the sequence of events. Ms. Grimmer was one of many cases, which falls through the cracks and goes uncared for. Ms. Grimmer could not tolerate the pain of witnessing her children starve. Her impotence to provide for her children led her to the catastrophe of taking the lives of her children as well as her own. There were claims in the media that Ms. Grimmer was mentally incapacitated. However neighbors who witnessed her struggle for survival spoke out to the community after the incident. They clearly stated she was in total competency, came across as well educated, and was a well mannered person. For centuries, nations, cities, and individual families have dealt with the problem of poverty; how to remedy current situations and how to prevent future ones. For most of history, there have been no government controlled poverty assistance programs. The poor simply relied on the goodness of their families or, if they did not have a family, on the generosity of the public at large. Welfare faces as many problems as it did years ago. There is no universal agreement as to how to approach the welfare problem, because there is no universal agreement as to whether welfare recipients are victims or criminals. Many would like to say that the welfare problem has been solved, that we can now put it in the back of our minds. However, if critics are right about the direction that welfare is headed in, in five years we will have homelessness, crime, and starvation as we have never seen before. Few are heartless enough to be able to put starving children in the back of their minds. So where is the balance between middle America and welfare America? Is it our responsibility to let working Americans take home as much of their money as possible, or is it our responsibility to protect the jobless from destitution? If raising taxes a little bit now could save us a lot later, once welfare recipients became educated, taxpaying citizens, then should we aim for quick cash, or invest funds in our country’s future? Will we ever find an agreeable balance? If we do eradicate our welfare rolls, can a capitalist society function without an underclass? These are the answers that will, in time, become clear, and will probably lead to even more questions. However, perhaps the most pertinent question is the one asked in the introduction. Does anybody really care?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The original idea of the United States Social Welfare System that was prompted in the 1930s due to the Great Depression, was that it would be a temporary program used to help those who recently became unemployed to get back on their feet. In a recent article by Hope yen of the Huffington Post, "Four out of 5 U.S. adults struggle with joblessness, near-poverty or reliance on welfare for at least parts of their lives, a sign of deteriorating economic security and an elusive American dream." If you look at it more closely 114.8 million families as of 2010 depend on welfare compared to 4.5 million families in 1996. The United States government should restructure the existing qualifications and regulations for any current and future dependents seeking assistance from government-funded programs due to the increasingly high rate of chemical dependency, financial instability, and fraud within the programs.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, welfare does not save taxpayers’ dollars. The welfare system today is being abused more than it ever has. If you collect food stamps, why are you giving it to your niece to use while she is away in college? As Charles Murray has pointed out, if you make it attractive for people to get off welfare, you simultaneously make it attractive for others to go on welfare. Someone who has lost a job might find it worthwhile to sign up and let the state find her a new job within two years while providing such…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1996 Welfare Reform

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our book presentation was based on the book, $2 A Day. In the book, the authors argue that the 1996 welfare reform is incomplete with poor consequences. They argue that the new welfare reform not only cannot help the families in crisis, but also increase the number of individuals that live on only $2 a day. Throughout the book, the authors point out the flaws of the 1996 welfare reform and provide suggestions to modify it. The authors argue when we are trying to help the poor to live off poverty, we have to help them in a supportive way. Having to spend hours, days and weeks to apply and obtain cash assistance from the new welfare program when they are needed will greatly decrease their self-confidence in the society, which is very important…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is awaited them which was below that on which the poorest labourer could survive. For the past two decades, means-tested welfare or aid to the poor has been the fastest growing component of government spending, outstripping the combined growth of Medicare and Social Security spending, as well as the growth in education and defense spending. Welfare is not a bad thing to get if you was already off welfare or on welfare and if you want to get on welfare you can you just got to ask. Like I had some family on welfare that was broke and didn’t barely have nothing at all and couldn’t afford nothing either. If you apply just called human service department so you can apply for welfare. Welfare is barely known in Memphis because I barely see family on welfare. Other countries I see them on welfare and they have different names and different everything like they have different states in Memphis that can be on welfare and also if the court say so and have kids that’s the only way you can be on welfare if you have kids and if you is poor and don’t have nowhere to go or if you don’t have food, clothes and shoes and bras, panties and all that why you can only have welfare if you have…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Welfare is nothing new to the citizens of this country. It is a concept that arose over a century ago. Welfare was made famous by Bill Clinton, in 1996, and it has brought up much controversy. Arguments suggest the welfare system is highly abused by its members while others believe it is the answer to the nation’s poverty. Although the welfare system is state regulated, many people believe it is taken advantage of by underserving people. Often, people with nasty habits, sale their food stamp cards for extra cash, cigarettes, and drugs. Most of the time, these people have children that have to go without because their parent puts their government assistance towards unhealthy addictions.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does Welfare Feel Ashamed

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Welfare was created in 1935 to provide for the families in need of food, clothing, and shelter, but today it has become a large, controversial topic. Some people argue that it is ridiculous that some people can’t take care of themselves and must rely on everyone else’s money to support them. Those people cause those on welfare to become ashamed of themselves. I believe people on welfare should not feel ashamed because some do hold a job if not multiple, but still cannot provide for themselves and others have certain disabilities that restrict them from getting a job and supporting themselves.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that the authors of this article mean by “dream divide” is that the distribution of income and wealth in the United States have become more unequal, which make those living in poverty have an even smaller chance of reaching their American Dream. There are many reasons why the poor people have such a hard time getting out of this situation. The first reason is the “Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) focus on moving people from “welfare to work” has led to a major decline in the numbers of households receiving benefits and a huge drop in fund assistance to the poor. The second reason is that the TANF program reaches too few people among those that are eligible for the program. This make the poor have even further chance of reaching their American Dream. The third reason is the price increase in housing, high quality child care, higher education, and health insurance. The poor will most likely not able to afford to have these services because of the shortage of the money. The fourth reason is that the subsidized housing is given to 25 percent of those who need it and the current budget proposal would cut a lot of funding for this program. As a result, more poor people will have no place to live because of the effect of the budget cut. The fifth reason is that many of the households did not receive the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), due to the fact that they don’t have a person in their households that are able to earn several thousands of dollars per year. The factors that can cause this are: lack of child care, unemployment, illness, and an improper between job demands and available skills. The last reason is that the minimum wage doesn’t increase with the rise of the inflation. The poor will have a hard time to find the sufficient income to pay bills because they do not have enough money to pay…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States welfare system has been full of flaws since it was created. Some presidents such as Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton have pushed for some kind of welfare reform. In Regan’s “Welfare Reform” speech he called for a “reshape of our welfare system so that it can be judged by how many how many Americans it makes independent off welfare.” (President Ronald Reagan speaks on welfare reform). From when he started running for office, he was not a firm believer in the welfare system the United States was running. Reagan also believed that if changed were not made it would create “a permanent culture of poverty as inescapable as any chain or bond” (President Ronald Reagan speaks on welfare reform). Even liberals, such as former President Bill Clinton, believed a reform for welfare was necessary. His most known contribution to the welfare reform was the “passing of a sweeping reform bill in 1996” (The Clinton Presidency). Clinton came up with a welfare reformation bill which was considered his biggest contribution to welfare reform than any other president in the last decade of the twentieth century. The “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act” that Clinton passed “ required welfare recipients to find jobs and aimed to move poor people off welfare and into the work place” (The Clinton Presidency). Attempts to…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are approximately 67,891,000 Americans receiving government assistance, that is roughly 21% of the American population using some form of welfare. (Statistic Brain) While situations may arise, and people need help, the welfare system is now being used as a crutch rather than a stepping stone to becoming independent. The government should place more conditions on the various welfare programs. People all across the country are now abusing a system that was put in place to help people survive in a time of need. Welfare was created in the 1930s following the Great Depression to provide people with some assistance while the economy was at a low…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Poverty is not a monetary problem but a wide-ranging social issue that involves many factors including inadequate education, healthcare, and self-esteem. 12.5% of the population, more than 37.3 million people, suffer from poverty in the US and if something isn’t done soon, millions more will be pushed deeper into the poverty pool. The government has tried to create social welfare programs to end poverty and eradicate unemployment but these programs don’t address the main issues, only containing the problem. In recent years, the government has wanted to reduce the number of people on welfare and to cut back on funding for their social service programs. Although this is a difficult issue, after further examining the evidence, the government…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the 1930’s the face of welfare has been shaped multiple times with many different types of reforms. These reform were made in an attempt to reduce the number of people who depend on government assistance, and to help those people get back on their feet and function in a normal society. Some reforms that were major in the beginning steps of welfare were The Welfare Reform Act of 1996, the (PRWORA) Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, and The (TANF) Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. “In 1996 a welfare reform act was passed” (U.S Welfare System 2). “The welfare Reform act was a catalyst needed to begin this new era of welfare benefits and provision” (U.S Welfare System 4). As a result of this reform employment rates of recipients soared and caseloads dropped dramatically, But looking at the bigger picture this paved way for such a dramatic change in the society and how the government helped the people of the United States. Following this…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe our welfare system is poor, unregulated, and unstable. Most individuals who are on welfare abuse the privileges they receive; moreover, a vast amount of the individuals do not even need the financial support. Our welfare system should be changed in order to support those who really need aid. It is terrible to see individuals who truly need help not be able to receive it because of other people who take advantage of something they do not need.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welfare Reform Hurt

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Picture growing up in the inner city, in a home with your mother and possibly other siblings; the only source of income comes at the beginning of each month. The father in most cases not there; you don’t know where he is; one can only imagine. Depending on a source of income that comes once a month, and allowing families to be dependent upon welfare for generations; is wrong. Making it easy for a person to live this way does not help them; it hurt them. There has to be a better way to help people and educate them at the same time so they won’t be a statistic on welfare for years. Welfare Reform is the best solution…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today the federal government spends slightly over 1 trillion dollars a year on all levels of welfare, and state governments contribute another $430 billion for the same programs. That actually equals to a 41% increase since 2008. Not to mention Katherine Bradley, Rachel Sheffield, and Robert Rector all conclude that “at current rates the federal government will spend $7.5 trillion and states will spend $2.8 trillion on welfare, for a total of $10.3 trillion.” America cannot afford these ridiculous expenditures. The national deficit rose 5 trillion dollars over the past four years, and is expected to rise 845 billion this year alone.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poverty and Social Work

    • 8869 Words
    • 36 Pages

    From Poor Law to Welfare State: A History of Social Welfare in America- Walter I. Trattner…

    • 8869 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Good Essays