INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
As of today, we have reached the era of modernization. New technology have been created, one of this discovery is the computer. The technology has changed the different phase of our lives. Nowadays, with the help of computer, the use of robots and AI (Artificial Intelligence) inclined the field of industry and causes economy and education more spare time. Computer promotes our way of living in upgrade, an ease to almost everything. In recent years, the increased flexibility and user-friendliness of computer databases make these systems a crucial business component. In fact, some universities are now using Computer Database Management System for a faster and safer manifestation of data. However, the Office of the Student Services of Southern Leyte State University-Tomas Oppus encounters a problem of maintaining and recovering student profiles using the manual data processing. Manual processing is known for its accurate results but it is only good when the number of data to be process is less. In updating of student records, it takes time in retrieving their records. For safekeeping and fast data processing, development of a Computerized Profiling System should be in hand. This study is designed to achieve effectivity in collecting and retrieving of student records. The Office of the Student Services has not yet established a Computerized Profiling System.
Thus the researchers propose a development of a database for student profile for the benefit of the students and office of the student services, this programmed database is of great help to the mechanism and can improve the function of the office to be more organized in keeping file(s).
Objectives of the Study
This study aimed on the design and development of a computerized profiling system that will surely help the Office of the Student Services to minimize the time required in retrieving of student records. Specifically, this study aimed to: 1.
References: 2. Ewald, Laura A. 2006. Two information literacy standards address manageable comprehensive research at the master 's level in organizational communication. Kentucky Library Assocation. 3. Fyffe, Richard, and Scott Walter. 2005. Building a new future: Preparing "Future faculty" and "Responsible conduct of research" programs as a venue for scholarly communication discussions. College & Research Libraries 66 (9):654-663. 6. Liao, Yan, Mary Finn, and Jun Lu. 2007. Information seeking behavior of international graduate students vs. American graduate students: A user study at Virginia Tech 2005. College and Research Libraries 68 (1):5-25. 7. Van Belle J.P. (2004) A Framework to Evaluate the Quality of Information System Models. Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, Special Issue on “Qualité des systèmes d’information”, Vol 9 No 5-6, pp. 11-30. October 19, 2012 DR.PROSE IVY G