In the article “Students, Guns and Politics” by Allie Grasgreen, she describes the debate on college campuses whether or not students should be allowed to conceal carry firearms. It seems that Grasgreen’s position on the debate is neutral, she cites arguments from both sides but does not take a stance herself. In my opinion, I do not think the best course of action against gun violence is to necessarily evoke a policy such as conceal carry, since this allows more access to firearms and their presence on a campus community. Though I do understand that gun owners have their own rights, I just do not see the necessity, and I believe there should be more steps in general for people to obtain firearms. Even if there was perhaps a situation where…
Okafor persuades the audience on why carrying a concealed gun on campus is a positive thing in this article. She starts with ethos by telling her own personal story of being assaulted as a child. This stimulates emotion and helps the audience learn about her credibility. Pathos is then used when she explains how a gun makes her feel “empowered”. This word has a positive connotation to it to evoke emotion in the audience. Additionally, logos is used when bringing up the facts about gun laws and assaults. She notes, “... one in five women are assaulted during college”. This statistic is easy to understand and gives shock appeal.…
As a student, the issue of having anyone on campus carrying a concealed weapon concerns me just as it would anyone else. There are many pros and cons about…
However, the benefit of having concealed weapons allowed on campus is proven by the fact that 26 colleges and universities, in Utah and in Colorado, a total70 campuses, currently allowing concealed carry on campus have not been a single report of shootouts, accidents or heated conflicts. In fact, rather than causing crime as feared, Colorado State University’s crime rate has declined steadily since allowing concealed carry weapons. Allowing concealed weapons does not increase risk. To the contrary, it presents an advantage; it reduces crime and violence. Statistics and fact repudiate the fallacy that concealed weapons on campus will increase…
Meaning not every college student is necessarily your average student as stated in the article. The author discusses that students carrying guns are more likely to be white males, engaging in risky behaviors and binge drinking, be in trouble with the law, and attend college in southern and mountain states. And I feel he is right, because down south your average student that would be more likely to have a gun is a male that usually would be into hunting and came from a very country background, other then a black male for instance. The policy that is trying to be enforced on campus that there are no concealed weapons allowed may not work. This policy may not make students feel safer its just kind of there for a safety blanket. The next bet step to making these students on campus feel better may be to setup a more stricter plan to crack down on these concealed weapons. Plans such as making it mandatory to do room checks at least once a month, and maybe have more police on foot around campus. This may help the student feel a bit safer. I think the crackdown to be more strict on campus with concealed weapons would definitely help the campus students feel more safe and not have to worry about walking alone or even just walking to class in general. Just a few little things could make a big…
The article, "Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case on Concealed Gun Restrictions" is about a case that was declined by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday. The case, Peruta v. California, argues the good cause requirement in order for residents to be able to applying for a license to carry a concealed weapon infringes on Second Amendment rights. This mean the U.S Supreme Court was presented with a case about the Second Amendment and dismissed the court without hearing it. I believe the U.S Supreme Court should’ve listen to the case and not just this case, but every case. If someone is filing a lawsuit it’s because they was concerned about a certain topic. Therefore, their problem should be solved.…
The New York Times author, Dave Phillips, creates an article titled Grappling with Guns on Campus. Throughout his writing, he states several interviews with people in relation to the school who actively has a problem with or without the concealed carry law in Texas. For example, he writes, “I (Professor Lisa Moore) love what I do. I consider teaching and learning to be a sacred vocation. We want to do everything we can to promote it. I don’t see guns as a part of that. So, no, I won’t be allowing guns in my office.” Professor Moore is strongly against allowing firearms on campus locations, because she believes weapons do not matter when it comes to the subject of schooling. Author Phillips writes again, “It’s not that I’m (Huyler Marsh) afraid of getting attacked all the time. It’s more like a fire extinguisher or a seat belt… If I call 911, it might be ten minutes before they get here.” Despite two opposing viewpoints, it is always better to be safe than sorry, because no one knows what another person will…
A number of people get killed in different campus. Some states are allowed to carry a gun on campus and others are not. Campus should be a safe place for students and they should feel safe when they are going to the campus. There are many crimes happen on campus because of problem with two students or two groups and the students use their gun and start to kill each other. Also, there are many terrorists mean to school and killed people because those campuses are free gun. So, is it good or bad thing to carry gun on campus? What happen when government allowed students to carry gun on campuses? Will carry gun on campus make the campuses safe or dangers place? Students should not carry weapons on campuses.…
Official’s authorities are trying to avoid and find solutions to prevent future attacks. Which have occurred in Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois University. The Second Amendment states the right to keep and bear arms, but as Dickerson mentions that it’s a policy of debate. According to the Second Amendment, it’s subject to reasonable restrictions. Such as, banning guns on campus ground. Moreover, studies have reflected that students against students are most commonly perpetrating violence on campus. IACLEA’S believes “ Concealed carry initiatives do not make campuses safer” (Dickerson). Burnett argues, students and teachers have the right to defend themselves. The law states that anyone with a gun license has the right to carry a concealed…
He states that “Mass killers have [even] explicitly talked about the desire to attack gun-free zones. The Charleston, S.C., church shooting in June was instead almost a college shooting. But the killer changed his plans after realizing that the college of Charleston had armed guards,” (1), meaning if the college allowed the students to carry guns the shooter would have never thought of attacking the college. Lott mentions that “Oregon laws [allows] permitted concealed handguns on university property, but public educators have undermined the law by putting bans in faculty and student handbooks. For students and faculty, the threat of expulsion or termination is surely threat enough. Faculty members may lose not only their jobs but also their career,” (2-3), meaning that the students and faculty cannot be seen with a gun or they would have to face long term consequences that would impact them significantly.…
Up to what extent would you go for protection? Many colleges and universities have to come to a controversial argument on whether guns should be allowed on campus. The Students for Gun Free Schools (SGFS) is one of two organizations who is involved in this controversial argument. The SGFS is against the idea of students carrying guns on campus because they believe, as stated in their motto, they are “armed with knowledge, not guns!” (Kirszner and Mandell 633). The other organization is the Students for Concealed Carry (SCC). The SCC is pro-gun concealed carry organization that formed because of the unforgettable and horrendous incidents that have happened in the past years. The idea of guns on campus should not be tolerated because it may cause more collateral damage since the shooters won’t have enough experience, it can cause an interruption and distraction in everyone’s college education, and more permits would be more accessible to non-law abiding citizens.…
Having guns on campus would not be a very healthy learning environment. When students sit in a classroom, they should not have the fear of one of their classmates pulling out a gun. If students are too busy thinking about guns being on campus, it could distract them from actually working. This issue might even extend to not wanting to go to school because they feel unsafe and uncomfortable. Also not a very healthy teaching environment for teachers. The teachers might be scared that a student would pull a gun out on him or her…
* “College Campuses Are Less Safe without Concealed Weapons” by Students for concealed carry on campus. Gun Violence. Louise I. Gerdes, Ed. Opposing Viewpoints Series. Greenhaven Press, 2011. “Why Our Campuses are NOT safer without concealed Handguns,” Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, 2008.…
Also, in many campus shootings, professors and students could not defend themselves because those campuses were regulated to be gun-free areas. Though gun-free areas are designed to be safe zones, these shooting sprees show that they are not always safe. In fact, only criminals take advantage of such rules (Burnett). I agree with the idea that professors and students should be permitted to carry guns on campus to protect themselves.…
Guns on campus could possibly lead to an escalation of violence, an eye for an eye concept. The accepted way of handling a shooter is to calmly call the authorities. “The Gun Control Debate” P.G. 34” States that in 1993, 39,595 Americans were killed by guns, 71% (27,726) were handguns and 1% was of police force. The USs’ homicide rate is 70 times higher and 35 times higher suicide rate than that of the UK, which they have more of a restrictive gun legislation (per the Huffington Post.) Stats prove that small handheld firearms are most used in crimes. By 1999, gun crimes have dropped 68% when heightened police force strengthened. In the same year, the law for obtained a gun cracked down. When guns are brought in public places i.e. schools, grocery stores, or, law enforcement should handle public infringements. Law enforcement officials are trained and disciplined for heinous acts that are brought to the community. Otherwise, students shouldn’t be handling such consequential acts when terror…