Preview

Confederate Government Vs Unitary Government

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
480 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Confederate Government Vs Unitary Government
There is no one type of government that is way better than the others. In a unitary government the entire country is controlled as one and the government has all the power. In a confederate government the individual states have a lot of independence and there is a weaker and limited central government. A federal government is between unitary and confederate where the individual states still have power but the central government also has power.
A unitary government does not allow the individual states to have any power if there are any states at all. If there are states they just reinforce what the central government’s laws are. In a unitary government the laws are uniform throughout the whole country. One of the advantages of a unitary government
…show more content…
If state is not happy with a federal law, in some cases they can change it. An example of this is marijuana. Under federal law it is illegal but certain states have made it legal. States can have laws that other states don’t have. This can make it difficult for people to know all of the laws in the area they are in when they travel throughout the country. People could be breaking a law and not even know it. In federal government the power is more balanced than unitary and confederate government. This keeps the central government and individual state governments from getting too strong. The power is shared between them.
In confederate governments the state governments have a lot of power. This makes it so that there can be large differences in law from state to state. The central government is very weak and does not have much control over the states. This leads to conflicts between the states and central government. Often it ends up so the states are acquaintances with each other and not much else. An advantage of confederate governments is that individual states can be very independent and if people aren’t happy with laws in one state they can go to another state with totally different

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalism is basically a system adopted by a nation that allows two or more levels of government to have power over the same people and area. This, however, can lead to conflicts since the two governments might try to assert power over the same issue. This can be clearly seen in the Gibbons v. Ogden case. In this case, Chief Marshall was able to use the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to make clear that Congress, and not the states, has the power to regulate commerce between the states. Therefore, this conflict between the two levels of government was resolved by this court decision. If the United States had a unitary government, where all power resided the central government, this issue would not have…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the federal system government, there was an article of confederation (1776-1787), which was designed to keep more power in the states government, and less power in the national government. The article of confederation had much weakness, which calls for a change in the government system. The federal government system which is also known as “Federalism” is a division of power between a central government and state/regional government, and the division of powers are as follow; delegated powers (enumerated), which is expressly given to the national government; reserved powers, which reside in the state; and the concurrent powers granted to both national and state government. The balance and boundaries between the federal government and state…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Unitary, Confederate, and Federal System go hand-in-hand. As they are continuances of a unitary type, to a Confederacy with Federalism sitting in the middle. There are advantages and disadvantages of each system.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the idea of division of power between central and state governments (Madison Document A). In a compound government both the state and central governments must approve on the subject at hand for it too go into effect (Document A). Therefore not only one side is heard and can be made to help the people. Both governments share the powers to tax, borrow money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws. This provides for double security to the people because you have two different governments looking over these important powers making sure they are not misused. Federalism guards against tyranny because two separate governments are watching to make sure that the other does not become corrupt with its powers and the approval of both governments is needed to approve on matters (Document A). The state and central government are one compound government but two different distinct governments with equal…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal government has powers that are more general and apply to the country as a whole, while the state government has powers specific to their area. According to Madison in Federalist Paper #51 written in 1788, federalism guards against tyranny because, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Document A) They are able to control their separate areas of government while still controlling the power of the other, ensuring that the other does not accumulate too much power and turn the country into a…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper sets out to define or shed some light on the possible reasons of the separation of Confederate states from the Union. The North believed the highest power belonged to the federal government while the South believed that each state governed itself, and the question of slavery should be decided by the states not by the federal government. By examining these two points we may be able to get a clear understanding of popular opinions and mindsets that would cause a nation to war against itself. With the election of Abraham Lincoln on November 6, 1860 South Carolina saw the only recourse was to secede from the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It obtained all its advances, by having the federal government deal with the costs. The Union didn’t have slaves because they were against that. The Union and Confederacy differed greatly when it came to their beliefs and what they stood for. The Confederacy, or south, consisted of elven states like, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, and a few others.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government has many forms, the confederation, is a loose association of states in which dominant political power lies with the individual states and not with the central government (Turner 46). Individual states have power over individuals unlike the unitary system. The unitary system is a form of government in which principal power within the political system lies at the level of a national or central government rather than at the level of some smaller unit (Turner 46). This means that the citizens have direct allegiance to the central government then to the local government. There is debate on wither to allow individual states to vote and run themselves.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the systems of goverment, there are bound to be many disadvantages, as well as advantages. Ultimatley, the disadvantages and advantages all depend on the size of the state and nation. If there is a larger population, there is automatically a larger window of subjects that make it a go, and subjects that make it a no. Smaller populations tend to have a lower group to choose from. Together there are three branches, Unitary, Confederate, and Federal.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The southern states did not want the North telling them what to do or making laws they didn't want. Many southern states broke away from the Union to form their own country known…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union had a significantly larger population than the Confederacy. The Union had a population over 22 million people while the Confederacy had 9 million. The Union had a well organized government. The government was already establishment and experienced. They had an easier…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government may have tried to get the North and the South to come to a compromise on their differences during the 1800’s, but the Civil War was a completely inevitable event. One of the most notable differences between the North and the South was their stances on who should have more power in government. Northerners believed that federal government should be the one to decide whether slavery was to be abolished or not. The South disagreed since they felt that states should be independent, and have the right to make big decisions (like having slavery) without interference from the federal government. Their strong feelings were based on the fact that agriculture was what the Southerners depended for income and use of slave labor kept the…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But all similarities ended there because both sides wanted a different way of life preserved. Confederacy had a goal in mind that was to secure independence from the North and “to establish independent nations free from Northern political oppression and the repression of slavery” (Olson-Raymer). The War from beginning to end became an icon for everyone during this period, either they moved forward with life as a whole together with freedom for everyone or they retained their old ways and kept freedom as a privilege for those who have it. This was firmly believed that the Constitution protected slavery, but the Union had seen a better way for this to work, a way without the need for slavery and for a way for everyone to live together. Southerners, therefore, had the right to do what they believed as it was the only way to defend their right to own slaves and their belief in states' rights to do what they believe.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Looking back in history, America has always been under the federal government system. The federal government was establish by the Founding Fathers in order to create balance between the national government and the state government. Before a federal government in the United State, it was only two types of government; unitary and confederate. Looking at history, I agree that the federal structure fits the United States better than any other structure. What is a unitary and federal government? A federal government is when the power is divided between national and state. However, unitary government is when the national government controls the entire state. There are other types of government such as oligarchy, anarchy, democracy and more.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A unitary government is basically centrally powered and regulated. A unitary government is under one system and it controls and enforces all laws. China is another example of a unitary government which is controlled by a communist party. A lot of unitary governments don’t really have anything similar to a constitution and most of those countries don’t have a diverse culture. Unlike federal governments which work best with larger countries with larger diverse individuals with different cultures and certain needs as well.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays