Preview

Explain Why The Confederate States Seceded

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1113 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why The Confederate States Seceded
Why the Confederate States Seceded
Henry Blackburn
ITT Technical Institute Knoxville
Professor Clark

Introduction
This paper sets out to define or shed some light on the possible reasons of the separation of Confederate states from the Union. The North believed the highest power belonged to the federal government while the South believed that each state governed itself, and the question of slavery should be decided by the states not by the federal government. By examining these two points we may be able to get a clear understanding of popular opinions and mindsets that would cause a nation to war against itself. With the election of Abraham Lincoln on November 6, 1860 South Carolina saw the only recourse was to secede from the …show more content…
There were several other occasions the South cried for secession but none took the charges seriously. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 gave the North a cause that would join the different anti-slavery groups under one umbrella. This act allowed the people in the territories to decide for themselves whether slavery would be allowed within their borders. The South felt they should be able to share in the newly acquired territories. “The day may come”, charged Governor Thomas Brag of North Carolina, “when our Northern brethren will discover that the Southern States intend to be equals in the Union, or independent out of it!” CITATION Dor05 \l 1033 (Goodwin, 2005)
The Tariff of 1828, was a supposed protective tariff that was passed by Congress. To date this was the highest tariff in U.S. history. It enacted a 62% tax on 92% on all imported goods. It was enacted to protect northern industries, which was driving northern industries out of business. Dr. Thomas Cooper declared, “we shall, before, long, be compelled to calculate the value of our union.” CITATION Syd48 \l 1033 (Sydnor, …show more content…
The debate over who should make decisions pertaining to each state, the states themselves or the federal government. The southern states believed the questions of slavery should be each states decision and not the federal government. The states would decide if slavery would be allowed or omitted.
With the adoption of the Missouri Compromise in 1820 they felt they had found their solution. The Compromise established lands west of the Mississippi and below latitude 36 degrees 30’ as land permitting slavery and all lands north of that line to be free, (this did not include Missouri). There had to be an equal number of slave states in the South as non-slave-holding states. Also, the two regions had to have equal representation in the Senate.
The United States continued to grow, and with the addition of new territories the balance of slave-states verses free-states became threatened. There were several attempts to reach a peaceful conclusion through debates, The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 set the whole question on its
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    AP Us History Unit 5 study guide
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    AP Us History Unit 5 study guide

    The Tariff of 1857 lowered duties to about 20%. North blamed it for causing the panic, because they felt they needed higher duties for more protection, Republicans economic election of 1860: protection for the unprotected and farms for the farm less.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3
    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Book Review of Apostles of Disunion
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Book Review of Apostles of Disunion

    I think what drove the secession is clear racism, and the critical belief of the commissioners had on slavery. They said Lincoln's election was "nothing less than an open declaration of war." Dew believed that if slavery did not exist, we would have never had the civil war. We can look at bigger picture, which is, this war was a great loss for everyone, both Confederate and Union.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Could The South Secede Analysis
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Could The South Secede Analysis

    The south had the right to secede. They genuinely felt threatened and attacked by the north and others who were trying to take away their source of income. They made a choice that they thought was entitled to them. The South had valid reasons and it seems like the North were just threatening the South and took away their property.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    "How The 13th and 14th Amendments Changed American Society."
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "How The 13th and 14th Amendments Changed American Society."

    South Carolina voted to secede from the United States as a result of Abraham Lincoln's election to the Presidency. Lincoln had, over time, voiced strong objections to slavery, and his incoming administration was viewed as a threat to the right of the states to keep their institutions, particularly that of slavery, the business of the states. More states seceded, eleven in all, forming the Confederate States of America. The secession movement led to the Civil War.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Reasons Behind South Carolina's Secession
    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasons Behind South Carolina's Secession

    South Carolina’s Articles of Secession, is the “Declaration of the immediate causes which induce and Justify the Secession from the Federal Union” issued on December 24, 1860, by South Carolinas government.In order for them to explain their reasons for seceding from the United States following Abraham Lincolns election in November of 1860 with his strongly opposing platform against slavery in United States territory.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Harriet Beecher Stowe's Argumentative Essay
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Harriet Beecher Stowe's Argumentative Essay

    I t’s an intense tug a war between the North and the South. Both wanting to prove that they are stronger and that their side is right. So much tension between them, someone can practically cut it with a knife. The North and the South have been at each other’s throats for a long time. This bad blood between the North and South has been going on for a long time. This whole controversy came into existence because of Lincoln’s election. The Republicans elected Lincoln as their presidential candidate around the year 1860. The feud happened right in their home country, the United States. This has developed because the North and South couldn’t get along on just one topic, and that topic is slavery. Therefore, the southern states seceded because the…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Reasons For Confederate Secession Of 1861
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasons For Confederate Secession Of 1861

    There are countless disputes about what truly was at fault for the Confederate secession of 1861, from the weighted morality question of slavery to the differences in social structures. However, the Civil War was not about agreeing on societal customs or the abolishment of slavery. Freeing the slaves was an advantage but certainly not the goal. Like so many circumstances pertaining to American interests, the internal strife was due to the dynamic shift in the economic and governing power the states were experiencing, seemingly, all at once. Northern industrialization had allowed the production of exports to spread to the northern region, a fact that allowed the country to, for the first time, lessen their reliance on the South for economic…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush
    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The South Want To Secede
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Did The South Want To Secede

    So now this can explain, why were certain groups were for secession? The people who were for secession were mainly the slave owners and the people who were against freeing slaves. Just about all of the south. The South was like the North has all of the factories and we the south we only trade and they are trying to take that away from us.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Underground Railroad Research Paper
    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Underground Railroad Research Paper

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER) Missouri Compromise in 1820, Nat Turner's Rebellion in 1831,…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Southern Secession
    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Southern Secession

    In the Presidential election of 1860, Lincoln was elected to help run the country, which led to the secession of the Southern states. According to George Templeton Strong, Lincoln put immediate pressure within his first 10 days in office when the South practically felt forced to commit to treason within a fortnight (two weeks.) The pressure forced upon the Southern states to commit to treason put them under immediate pressure, which was only driving the two regions farther and farther apart and closer to the Southern states seceding. According to the political map of the two regions, Lincoln won none of the Southern states, but he still won the election which made them feel as though they were powerless against the North which made the Southern states uneasy…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Calhoun
    • 3420 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Calhoun

    During the 1800s, the North and South became increasingly more polarized as issues came up that divided the United States. One of these issues was whether the majority of political power should rest in a federal government or in individual states. Another issue was whether it was constitutional for the government to block the spread of slavery into the new territories.1…

    • 3420 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More