Congress Of Vienna Compared To The Treaty Of Versailles

The two treaties of Versailles and Vienna were both established to promote an enduring peace all through Europe. This mindset, achieved through the devastating wars that just occurred, urged European powers to create dependable frameworks for peace, specifically the Concert of Europe and the League of Nations; however, these groups experienced varying success levels. The Concert's eagerness to obliterate any resistance through a legal use of military power kept any real clash from coming to fruition; this is differentiated by the Leagues, who had an absence of authority, prompting the second Great War, or World War II.
When comparing both treaties, the two share a noteworthy similarity— the exertion contributed by the leaders who composed the treaty itself to orchestrate an enduring peace throughout Europe. This objective was frequently observed to
This thought that the League of Nations was to become a worldwide group founded to screen the activities of countries, and to prevent any events which may prompt a world war. In this regard, it is much similar to the Congress of Vienna; however, that is the place the similarities end. One of the key standards of the League of Nations is that every nation is self-determinate and has an independent mind, thinking for itself alone. This implies, as opposed to meddle in the working of every country, as the congress did, the League held that it would just intercede in intense circumstances, prompting a demeanor of lack of concern all through the world. As a result, in the global clashes, the group did nothing to counteract or halt the conflict. They also acted in such a way during the appeasement of Germany. As opposed to bother the quiet daze that the powers of Europe ended up in, they simply surrendered the defeat to Germany repeatedly, enabling it to dismantle the framework laid down by the treaty and set the ground for World War