The conflict remains happening, but that technology brought issues as it decreases the level and the precision of learning area, and also reduces skillset knowledge and creativity. Technology may bring some changes and progression in supporting processes and transferable skills, but why does it still endanger academic level?
In my personal perspective, nervousness by causing mistrust and doubting its existence may be happened due to the shortage knowledge on the usage of technology. For instance, we rather care about the result normally than procedure.
The biggest reason for this issue is that, even if we may have good understanding and skillset on technology, there are many hidden issues that we eagerly try to prevent. In a conclusion from some professors, there are some conflicts between servers and local drives, Internet and intranet, document locations and security, or something like Web portal technology. For technology frequent user, the result has been discovered back then. While for others, it is always not easy to admit for not understanding and there are a few ways and solutions to fix these types of difficulties honestly at majorly organizations which provides system operations for technology support, not user knowledge. The answers can be found on knowledge banks and it is updated regularly, but it is still pointless if the users have no idea how …show more content…
For an example, a student with a great knowledge and ability in research skills and team building skills yet still fail to choose or decide the precise answer in multiple choice exam. Evidently, every student has to understand the whole point and the procedure of the course or else it will be completely pointless. However, if the teacher teaches the students in a smart and correct way by providing them at least a chance to determine the whole knowledge in a context which adopts highly developed research and team-building skills, it will improve the students’ understandings on the whole course. In these sorts of scenarios, what matters the most is not the procedure of learning but the student’s capability to achieve an individual task or test instead. A huge challenge is proved by K-12 in this case as a lot of systems lately rely and commit fully on test