Preview

Constitutional Convention Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Convention Speech
Countrymen, my fellow delegates, we are gathered here at this convention to discuss the means of ratifying our constitution. First off, I would like to restate that we all have our own different views of government and we are all free to opinion. However, when it comes to the approval of this great document there should only be one side. This side, of course, pushes for the agreement that this constitution of our United States of America is what is best for the country and its inhabitants. I have heard the anti-federalist complaints and understand why you would side with such things. You might reason that, the national government will have too much more power and will overpower state governments. We all know that the anti-federalists are afraid of a strong national government but it is almost necessary. I can assure you that without a government that has power both politically and militarily, all chaos can break loose. We need this constitution to provide structure and backbone to our new country. Now, with the government having power I have also heard the cries that some are concerned about losing the rights that were so passionately fought for during our Revolution. After conversing with fellow delegates, both federalist and anti-federalist, we think these cries can be put to rest by the addition of a Bill of Rights. I think we can all agree on the preservation of our hard earned rights, so the addition of a Bill of Rights seems like a fair compromise to sway you towards ratification. I hope that you will take this into consideration so that we can move on and put into place the constitution that our country desperately needs. The last theory about this document I would like to put to rest is that the executive branch of government will have too much power. Most of all, this document prevents us from having another all-powerful king such as the British. If you have fully read the constitution you would understand that we have already formulated a separation


Cited: "Federalists and Anti-Federalists." Oracle ThinkQuest Library. Web. 5 Oct. 2010. . Smith, Gregory. "Mr. Smith 's Lectures." Escondido Charter High School. Lecture.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the meaning of this document is to let people know that there is just more than one side to the different acts that England was passing. There was an English side as well as an American side. The point was to show us the different views of each side, and help us realize that it was more of a misunderstanding rather than England wanting to take all control, and America wanting to break away from England. I think that one of the biggest misconceptions most people get from these different acts that eventually led to the revolution, was that America wanted to separate from England. However, this wasn’t the case. America actually wanted to stay a part of the English Empire. America and England just could never see eye to eye, for example how each of them saw America’s…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A newly developed constitution brought upon adverse opinions as to its “new republic form being as enshrined” as well as it being a “danger”. Both oppositional and approval views were discussed within Madison Federalist No. 10 and Patrick Henry’s Speech against Ratification.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1781, the Articles of Confederation were written in order to secure the states' rights. This document lacked many qualities necessary for a successful government, and therefore caused a great deal of debate concerning the ratification of a new system. Federalists advocated the passing of a new Constitution, welcoming the tie it would establish between states and the creation of a strong central government. Opposing the constitution were the anti-federalists, threatened by its ability to eliminate their liberties just as they were previously executed by King George III.…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hi list of my future

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Go to the following website in order to read the selected Federalist papers from the…

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    While the concerns of the Anti-Federalists addressed many features of the formation of our government, this paper will focus on the Anti-Federalist concerns over the Executive Office and the presidential term of office, to fit within the parameters of the assignment. Anti-Federalist concerns over the Executive Office will be compared and examined against the FDR presidency, along with the corresponding more modern transitional time in which FDR governed, to provide some insight into the direction our government is headed.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be said that in a democracy, unity among the many cannot exist without compromise. Following the conclusion of the American Revolutionary War in 1776, the Articles of Confederation (the “Articles”) were written to allay fears about, and promote liberty, for its citizens, by legitimizing the rights of individual states. However, the Articles provided such restrictive powers for the underfunded national government to counteract deficiencies, that the union was at risk of collapse. A series of meetings, known as the Constitutional Convention (the “Convention”), was held to fix America’s dysfunctional political system, resulting in re-writing the American Constitution. Throughout the process of ratifying this historic document, many disputes…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Document 1 the author says, “Let us look and [see] the [problems that exist] in every part of our country . . . the complaints of our farmers . . . the complaints of every class of [people who loan money] . . . the [sad] faces of our working people . . . our ships rotting in our harbors . . . the insults that are [made against America] in every court in Europe”. The author who was a supporter of the Constitution being ratified talks about how many problems that the United States has under the current Constitution and he feels that the only way the problems can be solved is too ratify the Constitution. George Washington feels that people thought that they knew too much about how a confederation works when the first…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The delegates at the Constitutional Convention made the right decision to sign the constitution as although imperfect, it was a solid start to creating a stronger federal government that would begin to correct America’s mistakes.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, the historical fact remains that Virginia did accept the constitution, and during a time in which ratification was not a foregone conclusion. The success of the Federalist movement in Virginia begs the question, were the writings and actions of the Anti-Federalists indelibly relevant to the course of American history? I argue that the answer is unquestionably yes, for while they did not successfully refute the Federalist cause, they created a space for the address of their own concerns in the push for the Bill of Rights. The intensity of Anti-Federalist fervor and complexity of its concerns made the issue of forming a bill of rights even more pressing for the founding fathers. Thus, in its formation, the Virginia Anti-Federalist movement achieved success in its own right.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Letter

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It has come to my attention that we have opposing views on many of the topics discussed at the Constitutional Convention. Representation, counting slaves for taxation and representation, federal control of taxes on imports, and the federal governments control on trade are just some of the topics we have yet to see eye to eye on. I would like to focus on one specific issue and bring to your attention the flaws in you system. I would like to explain why I feel that my system would be a better suit for the states. That is why I write this letter to you explaining and observing our different views on representation.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays