Additionally, just having the overhead threat of a Soviet aggression meant that the United States indulged in extensive military spending on a war that never took place, taking funds away from actual domestic developmental policies. It can be argued that the building up of military strength was what deterred Soviet aggressions but as can be inferred from facts, the Soviet Union could not practically aim at a world domination that the united States feared without excessively overextending their resources. It was also acknowledged by President Eisenhower that the war was not only military one but also an economic one where the threat of war meant the US maintained an expensive military preparedness that in time would bankrupt the country and provide the Soviet Union a victory without it having fired a single
Additionally, just having the overhead threat of a Soviet aggression meant that the United States indulged in extensive military spending on a war that never took place, taking funds away from actual domestic developmental policies. It can be argued that the building up of military strength was what deterred Soviet aggressions but as can be inferred from facts, the Soviet Union could not practically aim at a world domination that the united States feared without excessively overextending their resources. It was also acknowledged by President Eisenhower that the war was not only military one but also an economic one where the threat of war meant the US maintained an expensive military preparedness that in time would bankrupt the country and provide the Soviet Union a victory without it having fired a single