Preview

Corporate Social Responsibility

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Social Responsibility
Over the years, there have been theories of Corporate Social Responsibility that have flourished. These theories have help corporations to understand the importance of Corporate Social Responsibility. Other theories have provided an explanation of beneficial or damaging effects. Most importantly, each theory provides a different perspective on applying corporate social responsibility. Overall, corporations need to understand how both theories, Systems Theory and The Triple Bottom Line theory, relate to Corporate Social Responsibility within their corporation. Systems Theory is one example of the theories of Corporate Social Responsibility. According to Haddox (2011), “ Systems Theory indicates that an organization is only one component in much larger economic, political, social, and environmental systems” (p. 2). In the business world, this theory provides the structure of internal and external environmental factors allowing the operation of many subsystems. With intertwining relations, one simple change within the system could have a domino effect within the whole organization. Corporations must consider their actions and/or decisions will affect both every component and department involved. Another Corporate Social Responsibility theory is The Triple Bottom Line theory. Hall and Slaper (n.d.) defines The Triple Bottom Line theory as, “an accounting framework that incorporates three dimensions of performance: social, environmental and financial” (The Triple Bottom Line Defined, para.1). Most importantly, measuring the success within the organization and society. The goal of sustainability for any corporation, “the “triple” in Triple Bottom Line refers to profits, people, and planet. The bottom line, “Corporate social responsibility modifies that both financial data and company’s effect on the people and the natural environment are also important measures of its performance ” (Argosy University, 2012, p. 2). Understanding how Systems theory and Triple


References: Argosy University. (2012). Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility / B7432 A01.   Modules 1 – 8.  Retrieved October 18, 2012 – December 8, 2012 from Trodick, S. (2012). Does Triple Bottom Line and Systems Theory Support Each Other? Retrieved from http://www.examiner.com/article/does-triple-bottom-line-and-

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Savitz, A., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today 's best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success – and how you can too. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.…

    • 3559 Words
    • 102 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economic dogma states that the main objective of publicly traded firms is profit maximization. In modern times companies have been run with that objective in mind; in the process of maximizing profits, irrefutable damage has been inflicted to the environment and the human capital in charge of running those business. Rimanoczy (2015) reflecting about the maximization of profits business model expressed, "Focusing on the bottom line as the ultimate priority has had an impact on raising unemployment, social crises, environmental challenges, health impacts, to name a few"(para. 4). Different schools of through have proposed several methods to integrate the needs for profits and social responsibility; in this context, John Elkington developed a new approach to measure corporate sustainability denominated the Triple Bottom Line. The new method expands the original corporate goal of focusing on profits by also including the assessment of the company's environmental and social performance (Jackson, Boswell, & Davis, 2011).…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Businesses, specifically larger corporations, play a major role in what occurs in society therefore, they are responsible to their stakeholders not only to pursue economic goals but the greater social good as well. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) means that a corporation should act in a way that enhances society and its inhabitants and be held accountable for any of its actions that affect people, their communities, and their environment. (Lawrence, 2010). Social responsibility is becoming the norm so much so that some businesses have incorporated it into their business model. There are three components of the bottom line of social responsibility in business: planet, people, and profitability (3P). This is also the formulation of the triple bottom line, or TBL.…

    • 4314 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An approach that is much more encompassing of the true meaning of the triple bottom line is rather than having a profit first mentality, having a sustainably effective approach that truly focuses on the needs of the people, the planet and also profit. The organizations that are taking this to heart are not strictly looking into profit. They integrate sustainability into the heart of their company and go from there. They are measured by all three areas; not simply profit.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bus4002 Business Report

    • 4988 Words
    • 20 Pages

    An approach to measurement of sustainability is by using triple bottom- line accounting. (Elkington, 1997) The Triple Bottom Line theory (John Elkington, 1997) is an approach that tries to weigh economic, social and environmental performance. The 3P 's -People, Planet, and Profit are often used when referring to TBL. It goes beyond the traditional, financial aspects and reveals the company‟s impact on the world around it. The tripe bottom line used in the Toyota to explain the business and public activities. After the Toyota created, the company continuous to focus on the sustainable development of society. Toyota through the continuous innovation and manufacture the high quality products to leads the fashion. The Toyota understand the social responsibility seriously, and Toyota also need explain the economic and cultural sustainability plan to their investors and stakeholders. From the 2001, Toyota conduct dialogue with the stakeholder and participants, they are from a range of company and institutions. Toyota also strengthen communication and coordination with external experts in CSR. The Toyota writing the sustainability report very year and release the report in the official website. Everyone could download the report from website if they want to know information about Toyota sustainability. As the plant in the triple bottom line standpoint, it…

    • 4988 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify and explain the Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility. Provide several examples of each ‘layer’ of the pyramid. Identify and discuss some of the tensions among the layers or components.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The triple bottom line serves as reports that can show the purpose and the condition of a company. The fundamental idea of it is that a company should not only use the old-fashioned financial bottom line, but also incorporate social and environmental bottom lines into present management (MacDonald and Norman, 2004, P.20). Social and environmental bottom lines separately mean how a company has benefited society and environment for the future generations to sustain and develop themselves. In addition, Tribble (cited in Cheney, 2004, P.12) claims that irrelevant, untargeted do-good contributions, such as charity, are not included in the triple bottom line.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of triple bottom line was first explained by John Ellington in his book the “cannibals with forks” (Kaplan, 2004). This bottom line continues to measure profits, it also measure the organisations impact on the people and also on the planet. It can be referred as a way of expressing a company impact and sustainability on a local and a global scale. Major concept behind triple bottom line, is that companies are responsible to stakeholders, this include individuals who are directly or indirectly connected to the company. The company is also responsible to the planet that we are living in. This approach views the shareholders in the company as being part of the stakeholder. In this paper, triple bottom line is analysed, to look at its integration in management.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Triple bottom line

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The concept of Triple Bottom Line (TBL), as John Elkington coined it in 1995, refers to the idea that companies and organizations should extend their agenda beyond the goals of economic prosperity by taking a three-dimensional approach to business, adding social justice and environmental quality as new goals on their agenda towards ‘sustainable capitalism’. Encouraging concern about sustainability is, according to Elkington, absolutely necessary if we are to survive on the planet: “to refuse the challenge implied by the TBL is to risk extinction”. (Elkington, 1999:139) The TBL model is used to measure the impact that the three bottom lines – economic, social and environmental – have within a certain business or industry sector against which it is applied. TBL is closely linked with the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) whose goal is to enhance sustainable growth by developing new business practices. In describing the TBL model as a way/strategy to lower the (negative) impacts of business activities on the community and the environment by rising awareness, Elkington emphasized the importance of asking new questions that do not concern only financial aspects, rather they are a combination of ‘corporate governance’, social responsibility and sustainable development: “What is business for? Who should have a say in how companies are run? What is the appropriate balance between shareholders and other stakeholders? And what balance should be struck at the level of the triple bottom line?” (Elkington, 2006:524) For Elkington, the transition towards sustainable capitalism depends on seven ‘revolutions’ as follows: markets, values, transparency, life-cycle technology, partnerships, time perspective and corporate governance. The author describes this transition as “one of the most complex our species has ever had to negotiate”. (Elkington, 1999:140)…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When these initiatives are carried out in a fair and just manner towards employees or contractors, then a win-win-win scenario is achieved. This approach of increasing profitability and improving the environment, while serving the community well through fair employment practices, is known as the "triple bottom line" and is the core component for sustainability programs, sometimes referred to as corporate social responsibility (CSR).…

    • 301 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Triple Bottom Line

    • 3426 Words
    • 14 Pages

    John Elkington strove to measure sustainability during the mid-1990s by encompassing a new framework to measure performance in corporate America.1 This accounting framework, called the triple bottom line (TBL), went beyond the traditional measures of profits, return on investment, and shareholder value to include environmental and social dimensions. By focusing on comprehensive investment results—that is, with respect to performance along the interrelated dimensions of profits, people and the planet—triple bottom line reporting can be an important tool to support sustainability goals.…

    • 3426 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Triple Bottom Line

    • 5601 Words
    • 23 Pages

    In 1994, the author coined the term triple bottom line. He reflects on what got him to that point, what has happened since – and where the agenda may now be headed. The late 1990s saw the term ‘triple bottom line’ take off. Based on the results of a survey of international experts in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable development (SD), Figure 1.1 spotlights the growth trend over the two years from 1999 to 2001. As originator of the term, I have often been asked how it was conceived and born. As far as I can remember – and memory is a notoriously fallible thing – there was no single eureka! moment. Instead, in 1994 we had been looking for new language to express what we saw as an inevitable expansion of the environmental agenda that SustainAbility (founded in 1987) had mainly focused upon to that point. We felt that the social and economic dimensions of the agenda – which had already been flagged in 1987’s Brundtland Report (UNWCED, 1987) – would have to be addressed in a more integrated way if real environmental progress was to be made. Because SustainAbility mainly works, by choice, with business, we felt that the language would have to resonate with business brains. By way of background, I had already coined several other terms that had gone into the language, including ‘environmental excellence’ (1984) and ‘green consumer’ (1986). The first was targeted at business professionals in the wake of 1982’s best-selling management book In Search of Excellence (Peters and Waterman, 1982), which failed to mention the environment even once. The aim of the second was to help mobilize consumers to put pressure on business about environmental issues. This cause was aided enormously by the runaway success of our book The Green Consumer Guide, which sold nearly 1 million copies in its various editions (Elkington and Hailes, 1988).…

    • 5601 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a sense of duty that every organisation is required to uphold. A set of principles, which an organisation adopts, shows that they are socially responsible towards the society that supports them. Organisations should take the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) concept into consideration to ensure that they are not doing anything that is morally unacceptable to the society, environment or economy. TBL is measured in terms of people, planet and profit otherwise known as three Ps. Let us look at how CSR could influence the organisational behavior of ‘BreadTalk’, a famous local brand of food and beverage chain which started in Singapore in the year 2000.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Toshiba Corporation is one of the massive Japanese companies relating to semiconductor and electronics (Burris, 2014). To reach an extremely successful, company does not only concern about maximizing the profits. The framework of Triple Bottom Line was adapted to be cooperative with business field by Toshiba. In 1994, John Elkington who founded a British consultancy called sustainability established the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) to measure performances of organizations (The Economist, 2009). The Triple Bottom Line also involves with the term of Corporate Social Responsibility or CSR (Green Marketing, 2010). For maximizing the profits and being responsible for environment and human rights, the entire businesses have to conform the TBL framework.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two main theories dominate discussion of corporate responsibility: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. Stockholder theory maintains that profit for stock owners represents the main moral obligation of the corporation. Stakeholder theory takes the view that groups other than the stockholders, such as the community at large, have a vested interest in the management of the corporation. The types of corporate social responsibility typically align with the stakeholder theory that corporations have responsibilities beyond profit.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays