Preview

Cosmological Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cosmological Argument
The cosmological argument has been used for centuries to appeal to the existence of God, dating back to around 350 BC. Versions have been found in Plato’s Laws, 893-96, Aristotle’s Physics (VIII, 4-6), and Aristotle’s Metaphysics (XII, 1-6). St. Thomas Aquinas, a Dominican priest, theologian, and philosopher, also included his version of the argument in Summa Theologica, along with four other contentions for the existence of God. The argument has been reasserted by Enlightenment writers such as Georg Wilhelm Leibniz and Samuel Clark, as well as criticized by 18th century philosophers such as David Hume and Immanuel Kant (Reichenbach).
Although there are various adaptations of the cosmological argument, each differing slightly, the basic premises
…show more content…
By definition He is the Creator of the entire universe, including time, logic, and natural laws (New International Version, Is. 40.28). It would be impossible for a creator to be limited by his own creation, so therefore God is not limited by time, logic, natural laws, or anything at all. This means that although infinities seem impossible in the natural world, as I will discuss later in the writing, time is not an issue for God. He states in The Bible, “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End” (New International Version, Rev. 22.13), reiterating that He has existed for all eternity and will continue to exist. All the same, this seems like a rather difficult concept for us as mortals to comprehend. We do not have examples of anything infinite or eternal in our world, as I will discuss in further detail later on, so it is hard for us to imagine anything having such a quality. God explains in The Bible, however, that His ways and thoughts are higher than our own (New International Version, Is. 55.9). We are not meant to comprehend everything at the moment, but we are promised understanding in the future (New International Version, 1 Cor.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Introduction: Elodea is a species of aquatic plant often called waterweed. Like other plants, Elodea absorbs carbon dioxide and releases oxygen during photosynthesis.…

    • 725 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these explain the existence of God through the study of Cosmology and the many findings by astrologists like Edwin Hubble, and simply what exists around society.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ Assess whether the existence of the universe requires God as a first cause?…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas was a very important man to the cosmological argument; it was him who came up with some of the strongest theories to support the argument. He came up with his five proofs which to him proved the cosmological argument to be true. One of his proof was the ‘cause’ proof, this goes as follows; nothing can change by itself therefore everything is caused and as Aquinas didn’t believe in infinite regress he said that there couldn’t be a series of infinite causes. So there must be a first cause, a cause that isn’t itself caused by another, and Aquinas would say this is God. But if infinite regress was proved to be true or even possible it would completely undermine this argument and prove it invalid, this is the same case as many of the other theories of the cosmological argument.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument for design has evolved over time as both theologians and philosophers have needed to adjust their arguments supporting this theory to address an ever changing landscape of scientific, biological and cosmological discovery. Despite this the essence of the argument remains intact those in support of the theory would argue that our existence on this earth and in this universe is far too complex a chain of events to have happened by chance. That in fact the existence of the universe is itself the result of a set of such improbable circumstances that there has to be intelligence behind its creation an architect, a creator or in religious terms a God (Chappell, 2011, p. 55). The versions of this argument are in my opinion interesting…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eternity is considered to sum up all time; past, present, and future. Eternity is the collection of all moments of time. Kohák explains it as the "absolute reality of being, intersecting with the temporal sequence of its unfolding at every moment". The absolute reality of being is how we focus on ourselves. This meaning of eternity is more personalized; eternity isn't just everyone's lives, but everything in our existence. Plants and animals are included in the new feeling of eternity. Every action and every experience makes up a personal eternity that is solely a personal eternity.…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought to yourself, is there a god? Is there actually an almighty being to protect us? Someone who will be there to forgive us for our immoralities? Well in this report, I will be examining evidence there is that suggests the existence of god to determine whether or not there I a possibility of the existence of God.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments collectively strive to prove one point, the existence of God. Ontological arguments lean on reasoning to prove its point of an a priori being or existence. Cosmological arguments focus on the idea that because there is this vast universe with an infinite amount of galaxies, God or a higher being, must have had a hand in creating the world and universe we live in. Teleological arguments emphasize on the idea that the universe was created solely to carry out the purpose or end result that it was designed for by…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The big bang theory cannot be reconciled with the notion of an intelligent designer. T or F…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays