2. Taxpayers could deduct expense they substantiated with receipts and showed were related to their activities. But taxpayers were denied deductions for expenses they didn’t substantiate or show were related to…
MILLERSBURG — A Wooster man has denied criminal charges he was in possession of methamphetamine when he was pulled over for a traffic stop in January.…
In Morrison v. Olsen, the issue of the Independent Counsel Provision in the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 was challenged and the court decided that it was not unconstitutional because it did not violate the separation of powers by taking power from the Executive and giving more to the Judicial or Legislative branches. Alexia Morrison had been appointed as the independent counsel to investigate Morrison to see if he had violated federal law; he sued her arguing that the Independent Counsel had taken away powers from the executive. The majority held that Morrison was an “inferior officer” due to the ability of the Attorney General to remove her for “good cause”, she can only perform certain limited duties, she is limited in jurisdiction, and…
Statement of Facts: The Whiteheads got divorced in 2016. Mr. Whitehead is supposed to pay $700.00 a month for child support. In January of 2017, Mr. Whitehead lost his job and stayed unemployed until October of 2017. After 10 months of being unemployed, Mr. Whitehead found a job as an electrician.…
In the case of Smith v. United States, the plaintiff, John Angus Smith, was convicted of engaging in drug-trafficking, which would have granted him a five year sentence had he not “used” a firearm in regards to the incident. As stated in statute 924(c)(1), the use of firearm in relations to a drug-trafficking crime enhanced the sentence, and turned it into a 30-year sentence. The argument at hand is whether the term “use” was to be taken from a broad dictionary definition or in the ordinary meaning. The majority of the court argued that the term “use” should not be limited to the intended use of the firearm (as a weapon) as they exemplified cases of which the firearm was used as a bludgeon even though that was not it’s intended purpose, yet…
It was determined that the plaintiffs failed to show any part of the statute led to a denied admission to any non public school on racial or religious grounds. So the complaint of violating the 14th amendment was not discussed and dismissed for lack of standing.…
Respondent Jones was a subject of a Government investigation in part of a much larger drug trafficking conspiracy. As part of the investigation, FBI agents had obtained a court order to place a GPS tracking device on a vehicle driven by Jones – a Jeep registered to Jone's wife. The court order was issued in the District of Columbia and was set to expire 10 days after it was signed by the judge. On Day 11, the Government attached the GPS device underneath the carriage of the Jeep on a public roadway in Maryland. Effectively, the government was acting outside of its authorization. The device reported GPS tracker data for 28 days after the installation to a Government computer, providing location information for several weeks. This evidence was used against Jones resulting in a hung trial. Jone's was retried and later convicted. Jone appealed, and the D.C. Circuit Court reversed the lower court's finding, citing the evidence was obtained in violation…
Bob Ewell is the father of Mayella Ewell, the victim in the Ewell v. Robinson case. Mayella Ewell claims to have been beaten and raped by Negro, Tom Robinson. She claims she had him do work for her in the yard and when she went inside to get a nickel to pay him, he rushed her whilst her back was turned. She says she turned around and he took control of her and beat and took advantage of her. These claims were blatant lies.…
Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result, Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps, regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American citizen, refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore, he was convicted of disobeying the law. This landmark court case was deemed unconstitutional due to the violation of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:…
The court case, United States v. Lopez, was the first Unites States Supreme Court case in a long time, since the early 1930’s, that confines the power of congress. Which functions the importance of the relationship between the federal government and the states. The National and State government both share similarities in which they create and enforce laws. The United States has been dependent on sharing powers with the Federal government and individual State government. However, many cases have been able to represent the arbitrary to the allocation of powers. This case in particular showed that Congress was way over their power for controlling a public school district.…
Korematsu v United States was a court case that argued that the orders provided to Korematsu were based on race only and were contradictory. Because they were only based on race, Korematsu argued they were unconstitutional. Korematsu argued he had contradictory orders, and, no matter what he did, he would have violated one of them. However, the United States argued that the government has different powers during peace time and war time. The government executed the orders to provide better security to the American people, and therefore the orders were constitutional.…
Robinson v. California, 1962 “11721 of the California Health and Safety Code states: “No person shall use, or be under the influence of, or be addicted to the use of narcotics, except when administered by or under the direction of a person licensed by the State to prescribe and administer narcotics. Any person convicted of violating any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be sentenced to serve a term of not less than 90 days nor more than one year in the county jail” (law.cornell.edu) “Lawrence Robinson, a resident in California, was arrested after a police officer thought that he had injection marks on his arms. The officer also added that Robinson claimed that he was an addict, which the he later denied. His 90-day…
HM Advocate , the charges were rape and assault with intent to ravish. Fraser having intercourse with the complainer by deceiving her that he was her husband. Fraser objected to the charges, due to the absence of force and that the complainer did not refuse to consent. The court agreed and the objection was sustained because of the absence of force. Lord Cockburn stated that consent, was actually given, albeit mistakenly and only withdrawn after the act, when the deceit was apparent. In Sweenie v. HM Advocate Lord Abdmillan’s opinion stated that force is an essential element in the crime of rape. He also stated that it must be force employed to overcome will. Lord Cowan concurs stating the act must have been perpetrated forcibly. The charge of rape was dropped due to the absence of force. Both Fraser and Sweenie set the precedents with regards to needing force and actual refusal of consent for the charge of rape. HM Advocate v. Grainger regards consent. The accused claimed the crime cannot be committed unless a woman is in a condition, physically and mentally, to exercise her willpower and offer resistance. The complainer was highly intoxicated and unable to give or refuse consent. Lord Anderson stated this contention seems to me to be well founded and on that basis the charge of rape was dropped. Barbour v. HM Advocate the complainer did not offer any physical resistance; normally this was a requirement that showed the accused overcame the will…
For example, in Situation 1 if anyone performs Y, then they are consenting to Z. Person 1 performs Y, and as a result is consenting to Z. However, in Situation 2 if it can be inferred from Y a potential to consent to Z, then if Person 1 does Y, they may be consenting to Z (Archard, 1997, pp. 283-4). For Archard, Husak and Thomas make a move from Situation 1 to Situation 2 as their definition of sexual conventions (Archard, 1997, pp. 284-5). The difference between the two situations can be expressed through the difference between the meaning of a wink and a nod.…
Rule: The court used the case, Ellyson V. State, 603 N.E.2d 1369, 1373 (Ind. Ct.App.1992) In that case, Ellyson was charged with burglary because he broke into the house where him and his estranged wife lived with the intent to rape her. He was still charged with burglary even though he had the right to possession of the house co-equal with his wife at the time of the breaking and entering.…