Preview

Creationism Versus Darwinism in Public Schools

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1734 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Creationism Versus Darwinism in Public Schools
Creationism v. Darwinism (Evolution) in Public Schools

Raquel Cade

Walden University

October 4, 2010

Creationism v. Darwinism (Evolution) in Public Schools
Should evolution be taught in public schools? This question has raised intense discussions since the 1925 trial of Scopes v. The State of Tennessee. As Tungate (2006) stated “The Tennessee Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a law prohibiting the teaching of human evolution in a split decision despite noting it was not drafted with as much care as could have been drafted (para1). Teacher John Scopes’ misdemeanor conviction for teaching human evolution was later overturned on technical grounds, but teaching human evolution remained illegal in Tennessee until 1967” (para1). This trial is sometimes referred to as the scopes monkey trial.
Should the controversial question about “teaching evolution in public schools” be expanded to include; which theory should the public school teachers teach to their students about how humans came to be in existence, creationism or evolution? Numerous religious leaders, parents, and even some educators would like to have the creationism theory taught in public schools in place of the evolution theory or at best along side of evolution. Another question we need to consider, should religious matters be taught in public school? Statistics according to Lac, Hemovich, and Himelfarb (2010) showed that the “Gallup poll in 2005 found that although 63% of respondents felt it was acceptable to teach evolution, an even greater majority (76%) of this very same sample responded that they would not be upset if creationism were taught in schools”(p.253). This paper will examine both sides of the argument of creationism and evolution in public schools.
Religious views of Creationism and Darwinism in Public Schools
Almost since the time that public school education came to be in existence; religious leaders, parents, and society have been debating whether or not God has a



References: Antolin, M., & Herbers, J. (2001). Perspective: evolution 's struggle for existence in america 's public schools Armenta, T., & Lane, K. (2010). Tennessee to Texas: Tracing the Evolution Controversy in Public Education Lac, A., Hemovich, V., & Himelfarb, I. (2010). Predicting Position on Teaching Creationism (Instead of Evolution) in Public Schools Le Beau, B. (2007). Science and Religion: A Historical Perspective on the Conflict over Teaching Evolution in the Schools Logue, Melissa (2010) Biology Graduate from Old Dominion Univeristy Merriam-Webster, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creationism Stolberg, T. L. (2010) Teaching Darwinian Evolution: Learning from Religious Education, Science & Education, v19, 679-692 Tungate, M. (2006) Evolution Court Cases. http://www.tungate.com/evolution_court_cases.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Wisconsin Vs Yoder

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “In sum, the unchallenged testimony of acknowledged experts in education and religious history, almost 300 years of consistent practice, and strong evidence of a sustained faith pervading and regulating respondents' entire mode of life support the claim that enforcement of the State's requirement of compulsory formal education after the eighth grade would gravely endanger if not destroy the free exercise of respondents' religious beliefs.”…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I disagree with the idea of teaching religion in our science classes, but in any case, such a change in the district’s curriculum would require approval by the state legislature, wouldn’t it?” Fingerhutt said.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The movie Inherit the Wind gives us a plain and simple story that the State of Tennessee passed a statute prohibiting the teaching of evolution. But in fact there was much more to it, in fact, in 1925 the Tennessee government passed the Butler Act which made it a misdemeanor to teach the evolution of only one species; mankind; in public schools. The evolution of almost all other plant and animal life (which is about 2 million species) or the evolution of the earth or the solar system could all be taught as either a persuasive theory or proven fact without violating the Butler Act.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion, politics, ethics should be prohibited to be taught in public schools. Should not be taught in public schools because it could corrupt students’ minds, it could offend people and cause conflict that could result into a very violence senareo between parents vs teachers and teachers vs students and that it would be a big battle and result in the hands of the court.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1920s dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One reason tensions where brought up was through the new idea of evolution and the old practice of creationism. According to Document C “The World’s Most Famous Trial: Tennessee Evolution Case, 1925” This trial was a case about whether there should be a punishment for teaching the Darwinism in the schools. This case involved John Scopes, a biology teacher, who taught Darwinism (theory of evolution). Scopes was found guilty. This case sparked a worldwide debate on academic freedom in the schools. This showed how old and new ideas eventually clashed.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lie: Evolution by Ken Ham is an informational book on the lies and corruption that evolution brings into society. A side purpose of this book is to encourage the reader to use Genesis as the foundation for defending your faith in Creation and God. The chapters summarized in this paper are the first six and the eighth.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology Quiz

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The debate over religion inside public schools in the United States is understood under the broader context of:…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Efforts to enforce a new state statute against the teaching of evolution in public schools had precipitated the arrest of Dayton educator John T. Scopes” (Pierce). Arresting a teacher for doing his job exposes the negative consequences of over-censorship. Not only was Scopes unfairly prosecuted, the students in all schools were robbed of an education. Learning about evolution could have broadened their horizons and exposed them to new ways of thinking. Instead, because society at the time feared evolution was a “threat not only to the belief in God but to the very structure of a Christian society,” their worlds were closed off (Pierce). Even after the closing of this trial, school censorship endures. Recently, the principal of Fauquier High School pulled an article from the school newspaper because a story on a new drug was “too mature” for the students (Balingit). This article, however, was intended to inform students about the new drug and describes the risks of it. The author of the article, senior SaraRose Martin explains, “I don’t think my article makes it sound good” when describing students who suffered from injuries ranging from “cracked skulls to cracked teeth” after participating in the new drug use technique (Balingit). In taking this article out of circulation, the principal took away a chance for children to be exposed to the dangers of this drug and the possibility to…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scopes Trial Analysis

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though Scopes had taught the theory of evolution, his defense lawyers in the case pleaded “...an act of this sort is clearly unconstitutional in that it is a restriction upon the liberties of the individual…”(Jeffrey P. Moran, Pg.82). On the other hand the prosecutors stated that teachers “...cannot teach any religion in the schools, therefore you cannot teach any evolution, or any doctrine that conflicts with the Bible.”(Jeffrey P. Moran, Pg.82). With the defense supporting science and the prosecution supporting the traditional Bible, this case has made it clear that in Dayton, Tennessee 1925 the teachings of science and religion can not simply coexist in a classroom. With teaching both religion and science in a classroom, it is inevitable that a student learning the story of the Bible and then learning the theory of science, would start to question which one holds the truth. In a letter written by Mrs. Jesse Sparks about the Butler act says, “...I could not see why the mothers in greater number were not conveying their appreciation to the members for this act of safeguarding their children from one of the destructive forces…”(Moran, Pg.204), which shows the concern from the religious point of view that the teaching of evolution might destruct the religious beliefs parents had taught their children. The reason why this topic had become so controversial was that the teaching of science conflicted with the views of the religious orthodox south which had been very dominant in 1925. This being said, science and religion in a classroom could not coexist in that day and…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the diversity of religions, along with dissimilar practices, schools should continue their public structure leaving religion entirely out. Public schools educate the belief of God, which might…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment prohibits Congress from casual any laws that appearance favor to any accurate adoration that, in effect, is an adequately absolute break of the abbey and state. If Congress were to pass a law that the Christian adaptation of creationism be taught, even in abstract classes in accessible schools which are accurate by the taxes of all Americans, it would breach the built-in rights of Hindus, Moslems, Buddhist, and array of added religions that curl beyond the country, abounding of which accept their own belief of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over seventy-six percent of the adolescents in America believe in a personal God (Regnerus). Despite this fact, the stigma surrounding the debate of separating school from religion mostly brings religious talk in education to a stand-still. Religion has presented itself in society for as long as history has recorded life in societies, and many individuals still practice their faith. In today’s society, however, teachers and educators rarely mention religion outside of Social Studies classes in public school systems. Yet, science has proven that allowing religion in lives affects and improves the quality of life. Public schools should allow religion because the presence increases test scores, results in better behavior, and leads to an overall happier life.…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, evolution was not scientifically proven, thus it should not be taught in public schools. Secondly, the majority of the public opposed teaching evolution, so their tax dollars should not have to support paying teachers to do so. Finally, because it is illegal to teach religion in public schools, it should also be illegal to teach irreligion. Poole’s bill was defeated in 1925, and then died completely in 1927. An element of historical theory, the 20/60/20 rule, adequately describes twenty percent of the population was strongly in favor of the Poole bill, twenty percent was strongly opposed, and sixty percent that could be swayed either way. The majority of the sixty percent was ultimately pulled onto the side of those who opposed the bill by the opponents’ platform that the bill could jeopardize the separation of church and state. Preventing passage of the Poole bill signified a triumph in academic freedom in North…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Future more, a reason for why creationism should be taught in public schools is that public schools are normally funded principally by local property taxes and administered principally by local government. If a healthy majority of parents with school aged children with a strong wish for creationism to be taught in their school system, they deserve that…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays